NATA Press Release RSS Feed

Pompeo Introduces Legislation To Help Revitalize General Aviation

Mon, 20 May 2013 14:26:00 GMT

On Tuesday, May 7, U.S. Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS) introduced legislation that will improve safety, decrease costs, and free private-sector innovation. The legislation calls for the FAA to reorganize certification requirements to streamline the approval of safety advancements.

The Small Aircraft Revitalization Act (SARA), H.R. 1848, seeks to cut burdensome regulations on the general aviation industry. The legislation helps to address decline in the sales of new private aircraft, the number of new pilots and flight activity. Pompeo stated that businesses looking to manufacture aircraft face many regulatory hurdles that hurt, and sometimes stall, production. By modernizing outdated regulations for this sector, the legislation states, this will result in a “clear path for technology adoption and cost effective means to retrofit the existing fleet with new safety technology.”

A FAA Part 23 Reorganization Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) has been working for 18 months to devise a new regulatory standard for light aircraft. New regulations, the ARC discusses in its report recently filed with the FAA, will simplify the design requirements to performance-based, rather than the current technology-dependent that are not always accurate. The new design requirements will allow for updated safety-enhancing products to be produced and applied. The bill requires implementation of the ARC’s recommendations by the end of 2015.

In a hearing of the House Aviation Subcommittee, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta recognized the importance of the certification process and stated that by summer, the Part 23 ARC will have recommendations to report that will be taken into consideration. The goal of reorganizing the certification process, the Administrator stated, is to ensure safety and restructure in the most efficient way.

Pompeo said in a press release that general aviation has “never asked for a bailout” but that removing some of the existing red tape could improve safety and cut the cost of building new airplanes.

“The existing outdated certification process needlessly increases the cost of safety and technology upgrades by up to 10 times,” Pompeo stated. “With this bill, we can ensure that the general aviation industry has what it needs to thrive.”

The bill is co-sponsored by Representatives Daniel Lipinski (D-IL), Sam Graves (R-MO), Todd Rokita (R-IN) and Rick Nolan (D-MN), all members of the House General Aviation Caucus.

Click here for more information.

NATA Holds Breakthrough Meeting with IRS on Federal Excise Tax Issue

Fri, 17 May 2013 11:42:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA HOLDS BREAKTHROUGH MEETING WITH IRS ON FEDERAL EXCISE TAX ISSUE

Alexandria, VA, May 16, 2013 – The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) today informed the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) that the agency will suspend potential assessments associated with current ongoing audits of aircraft management companies that are facing significant uncertainty as to their potential Federal Excise Tax (FET) liability.

Moreover, the IRS indicated that it would move forward toward developing new guidelines on the application of FETs with respect to this issue. We anticipate, in the coming months, that guidance will be developed to clarify future actions and audit standards, per the discussion with IRS officials earlier today.

Last week, NATA staff along with Marian Epps of Epps Aviation, Nel Stubbs of Conklin & de Decker, and representatives from the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA), met with senior IRS officials from the Small Business/Self Employed Division (SBSE) to make the case for clear and precise guidance on the scope of FETs on owner-operated use of aircraft being utilized in an aircraft management agreement.

“During this meeting, we strongly advocated our case and IRS officials did an outstanding job of tackling our concerns. They asked that we give them a week to review and they came back to us today with a decision to complete open audits but suspend any potential assessments until new guidance on the application of the FETs is developed,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks.

“We have come a long way with the IRS on this and we effectively reversed their views on how the industry functions and what the rules should be. I am very appreciative of the dialogue and professionalism these IRS officials displayed during this process. After sitting down with them face to face, I believe they have a better understanding of our industry. We have more to do and we will continue to work with the Service in a constructive and professional manner,” concluded Hendricks.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Contract Towers to Stay Open

Fri, 10 May 2013 15:37:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

CONTRACT TOWERS TO STAY OPEN
Working together helps change decision

Alexandria, VA, May 10, 2013 – Today, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced that it will keep open the 149 Contract Towers that the Agency slated for closure on June 15th.

As a result of a budget impasse between Congress and the Obama Administration an automatic spending cut mechanism called “sequestration” required the FAA to find $253 million in savings. The FAA in turn planned to shutter the contract tower program and furlough air traffic controllers to meet this requirement. Congress then stepped in and approved legislation giving the FAA the ability to reprogram existing funds within the FAA’s budget to apply towards the contract towers and air traffic controllers.

“NATA is very pleased about this and believes it was the correct decision by the FAA. The contract tower program is one of the most cost effective and efficient safety programs under the FAA’s purview”, said NATA President and CEO, Thomas L. Hendricks.

Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) were instrumental in pushing legislation through Congress that provided FAA with the authority they needed to move these funds. “Senator Moran’s leadership in particular was vital to getting this done and we thank him and the other 41 Senators who supported his tremendous work”, added Hendricks.

“Saving the contract tower program from extinction by using existing federal funds was accomplished by strong leaders in Congress and an impressive grass roots effort from across the country initiated by a coalition led by the U.S. Contract Tower Association, the National Air Transportation Association, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association”, concluded Hendricks.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

Action Call - Save the Contract Tower Program

Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:43:00 GMT

Action Call
Save the Contract Tower Program

April 30, 2013

Please call your United States Senators today and urge them to sign the letter below, which is being circulated by Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) requesting the FAA to keep the 149 contract towers open beyond June 15th.

IF YOUR SENATORS ARE NOT ON THE LETTER, PLEASE CALL THEIR OFFICES TODAY and ask them to sign on. Ask your Senate offices to contact Tom Bush in Senator Moran’s office (202/224-6521) to confirm their support or ask any questions. Please click here for phone numbers of your Senators.

At this time, the following Senators have signed the letter:

Blumenthal, Moran, Ayotte, Boozman, Cantwell, Hagan, Inhofe, Kaine, Kirk, Manchin, Murphy, Pryor, Risch, Roberts, Scott, Thune, Tom Udall, Vitter

Dear Secretary LaHood and Administrator Huerta:

As you know, Congress recently passed legislation giving the Secretary of Transportation the flexibility needed to avert air traffic controller furloughs and contract tower closures. We urge you to ensure that in addition to ending furloughs for 47,000 FAA employees, the agency also end the planned closure of 149 contract towers. This legislation gives FAA the flexibility and funding it needs to do both. Anything short of ending both the furloughs and contract tower closures would ignore the flexibility outlined in Section 2 (c). Our support of this legislation was based on the understanding that the contract towers would be fully funded.

While ending furloughs for tens of thousands of FAA personnel is a common sense decision due to the economic impact and flight delays caused, we are equally concerned about the status of the contract tower program. The contract tower program is a vital public safety and economic development asset for dozens of communities – many of them rural – in every corner of the country. These municipalities depend on the contract tower program to provide commercial and general aviation services, jobs, and in many cases, support for a variety of air ambulance facilities. The disruption that the combined closure of 149 contract towers would have starting June 15th would certainly go against the recently enacted legislation, which allows the U.S. Department of Transportation to “prevent reduced operations and staffing of the FAA during FY 2013 to ensure a safe and efficient air transportation system.”

In short, we strongly urge the FAA to use the legislation that passed Congress last week to fully fund the contract tower program. By providing up to $253 million in funding authority – far above the amount required to prevent furloughs – Congressional intent is clear: the FAA must prevent the slated closure of 149 contract towers by fully funding the contract tower program.

Click here for more information.

Membership Update - Congress Approves Bill To End FAA Furloughs of Air Traffic Controllers

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:24:00 GMT

Membership Update

Congress Approves Bill To End FAA Furloughs of Air Traffic Controllers
Contract Tower Program Mentioned

April 26, 2013

Congress has approved legislation to end FAA furloughs of air traffic controllers. The bill allows Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Ray LaHood to transfer up to $253 million in unused AIP discretionary funds to keep air traffic controllers working through the end of the fiscal year. The legislation will now be sent to the President for signature.

The legislation does not include a permanent contract tower fix but states that Secretary LaHood can use funds for the program.

NATA will continue to discuss contract tower program funding with the FAA.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATF Announces Scholarship Recipients

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:49:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATF ANNOUNCES SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS

Alexandria, VA, April 26, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Foundation (NATF) is proud to announce the winners of its Dan L. Meisinger Sr. Memorial Learn to Fly Scholarship and its Pioneers of Flight Scholarship.

NATF annually awards academic and flight training scholarships to assist outstanding candidates in the pursuit of careers in aviation service businesses.

Marcus Kaleb Phillips, a student at the University of Central Missouri in Warrensburg, is the recipient of the 2012 Dan L. Meisinger Sr. Memorial Learn to Fly Scholarship. Marcus is currently pursuing a degree to become a professional pilot and will remain an active member of many aviation organizations. Marcus is excited to become a CFI and hopes to contribute to the advancements within the aviation field.

Whitney Brouwer, a student at LeTourneau University in Longview, Texas, and David Peck, a student at the Moody Bible Institute in Spokane, Washington, are the recipients of the 2012 Pioneers of Flight Scholarship. In addition to being a pilot, Whitney hopes to use her degree in Aircraft Systems with an Electrical Technology Concentration to combine knowledge and experiences that will assist in the design of easier avionics and cockpit displays. David will use his Mission Aviation Technology degree to join a team that provides humanitarian support to remote locations around the world. “By using general aviation,” states David, “I hope to better the world.”

“NATF received a record number of scholarship applications this year. It was a tough decision for our judges, but the winners this year are passionate aviators very deserving of these awards. We wish them the best of luck in the pursuit of their dreams,” said NATA Manager of Safety 1st Programs Elizabeth Nicholson.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Applauds Senate On Sequestration Fix

Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:17:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA APPLAUDS SENATE ON SEQUESTRATION FIX

Alexandria, VA, April 25, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) applauds action taken by the United States Senate to prevent delays and safety implications caused by the Obama Administration’s decision to shutter the contract tower program and furlough air traffic controllers.

The Senate passed legislation provides the Secretary of Transportation the funding flexibility to prevent reduced operations and staffing at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). While the legislation did not directly address the contract tower program, the FAA will now have the flexibility to provide funding for the program. NATA will continue to work with the FAA to develop a common sense approach to ensuring the viability of the contract tower program that brings efficiencies and safety to our aviation system. The House is expected to pass the bill before week’s end.

Congressional leaders in both the House and Senate have introduced legislation to restore funding to protect the contract tower program. Senators Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) offered the Protect Our Skies Act to prevent the Department of Transportation from closing towers during fiscal years 2013 and 2014. On the House side, Reps. Tom Cotton (R-AK), Bruce Braley (D-IA), and Richard Hudson (R-NC) introduced similar legislation. Their bipartisan efforts helped pave the way for the continuation of the contract tower program and the equal distribution of reductions in spending among other FAA programs in a sensible and fair manner.

"Today's action by the Senate is in part due to the ongoing efforts of NATA members engaging in the legislative process. This bipartisan measure provides the means and flexibility for the FAA to prevent the shuttering of the contract tower program thereby ensuring safety and efficiency at many airports across the country - a win for communities and the traveling public," stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. "We will continue to work with FAA Administrator Huerta to address this important aviation safety program."

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Holds Inaugural Aviation Business and Legislative Conference

Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:24:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA HOLDS INAUGURAL AVIATION BUSINESS AND LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE

Alexandria, VA, April 24, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) convened its inaugural Aviation Business & Legislative Conference in Washington, DC this week in which more than 100 member companies participated. The conference featured key sessions with Executive and Legislative decision-makers and also included a highly successful congressional reception at the U.S. Capitol Building.

The week’s events kicked off on Monday with a luncheon featuring the association’s Annual Meeting of Members and Election of Officers. NATA welcomed Clara Bennett of Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, Greg Schmidt of Pentastar Aviation, and Andy Priester of Priester Aviation to its Board of Directors.

The first day of the Aviation Business & Legislative Conference included information-packed sessions on the following business topics: the opportunities and challenges on the road ahead for business aviation, generational leadership, money-saving Workers’ Compensation Insurance advice and disaster preparation. Attendees toasted the industry's best at NATA's annual Industry Excellence Awards dinner and presentation that evening. Click here to view a press release on the winners. Top honors went to James P. Miller, Flight Options, LLC/Nextant Aerospace, and Bruce N. Whitman, President and CEO, FlightSafety International with the Distinguished Service Award and the William A. “Bill” Ong Memorial award respectively.

The second-day schedule featured sessions providing information on the latest regulatory and legislative issues from the Transportation Security Administration, Federal Aviation Administration and key senior Capitol Hill staff as well as an update on new healthcare laws. The week’s events concluded with NATA's spring committee meetings.

“Our Inaugural Aviation Business & Legislative Conference is another major step in repositioning NATA in Washington,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “This conference proved to be a great opportunity to confer with our key business leaders and Members of Congress and to recognize a wide range of star performers within our vital industry.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Names James P. Miller Distinguished Service Award Recipient

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:21:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA NAMES JAMES P. MILLER DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARD RECIPIENT

Alexandria, VA, April 23, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) named James P. Miller of Flight Options/Nextant as the recipient of NATA’s Distinguished Service Award. NATA’s Distinguished Service Award is presented to an individual or organization still active in general aviation on a regular, day-to-day basis and recognizes outstanding service and ongoing contributions to the industry.

Mr. Miller has spent over 45 years creating concepts and innovative solutions to help foster and modernize our industry. Starting his career as an engineer and programmer with IBM Federal Systems Division, Mr. Miller was responsible for various avionics and ship-board systems design and development efforts. In 1968, he founded Miller Aviation and later Miller Avionics and Miller Information Technologies, serving as their President and CEO.

In 1998, Mr. Miller merged his aviation holdings into Corporate Wings and served as its Chief Operating Officer and a board member until 2000, at which time he became Executive Vice President of Flight Options. Here, he held various assignments, including overall responsibility for fleet maintenance, quality control, and aircraft acquisitions as well as many other key areas. In 2008, Mr. Miller became President of Nextant Aerospace, which introduced the concept of remanufacturing to business jets, applying the transformative principles of modernization and modification. With Nextant Aerospace, he was responsible for all phases of aircraft remanufacturing, engineering, certification and distribution, ultimately creating the industry’s first remanufactured aircraft — the Nextant 400XT.

Mr. Miller is a graduate of Penn State University with a degree in Electrical Engineering. He is a founding member of the FBO 20 Group, served on the National Air Transportation Association Board of Directors and the Northeast Ohio Business Aviation Association Board of Directors and was a past member of the Exxon Avitat Advisor Board. Mr. Miller holds an Air Transport Pilot’s certificate with more than 7,000 flight hours in numerous fixed wing aircraft.

“As a long-time industry leader, Jim Miller epitomizes the values recognized in NATA’s Distinguished Service Award,” stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “His keen insight and in-depth industry knowledge have enabled him to serve as a mentor to many throughout his career and especially during his time as a NATA Board of Directors member. It is a pleasure to honor one of our industry’s greatest thought leaders.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Elects Three New Board of Directors Members and Announces Leadership

Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:20:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA ELECTS THREE NEW BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERS AND ANNOUNCES NEW LEADERSHIP

Alexandria, VA, April 22, 2013 – Today at its annual Membership Meeting, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) announced the selection of Michael Scheeringa, President and CEO of Flight Support, BBA Aviation, as Chair of the NATA Board of Directors. The association named Gary Dempsey, President, Flight Services – The Americas, Jet Aviation Holdings USA, Inc., board Vice-Chair.

NATA also elected three new members to its board of directors: Clara Bennett, Manager, Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport (FXE); Andy Priester, President and Chief Executive Officer, Priester Aviation; and Gregory J. Schmidt, President and Chief Executive Officer, Pentastar Aviation.

Clara Bennett has served as Manager of Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport (FXE) since August 2004, directing the airport’s day-to-day operations, development and promotion and administering the airport’s 200-acre industrial airpark, John Fuhrer Downtown Helistop, and Foreign Trade-Zone #241.

During her tenure, Bennett coordinated more than $40 million in capital improvement projects and approximately $35 million in leasehold improvements. These public and private investments resulted in an estimated annual economic impact of more than $800 million generated by airport activity and a total payroll of $176 million generated by airport businesses.

Andy Priester joined Priester Aviation in 1997 and soon was managing the Aircraft Charter area. When the Priester family sold their FBO operation in 2001, Charter and Aircraft Administration became the main focus of the company. Priester served as Director of Charter Operations. Priester Aviation appointed him President on April 1, 2004. Priester was instrumental in growing the business from an initial 7 to the 40 aircraft they manage today and taking Priester Aviation from a regional to a national and now an international operation. In 2008, he orchestrated the acquisition of LionHeart Aviation, a leading aviation broker, which doubled Priester Aviation revenue. Priester Aviation appointed him Chief Executive Officer in January, 2013.

Priester is a private pilot and is Past President of Illinois Aviation Trades Association (IATA), Past Chairman of the NATA Air Charter Committee and Founding Chairman of NATA Charter Industry Audit Standards Working Group.

Gregory J. Schmidt is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pentastar Aviation (Waterford, Michigan). He joined Pentastar in 2008 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was instrumental in the recent acquisition of Aviation Interior Services (AIS) and the establishment of Pentastar’s new East-Coast repair facility at Oxford, Connecticut (OXC). Prior to coming to Pentastar, Schmidt was with Pulte Homes, where he served as the President of Pulte Homes of Ohio and as Manager on the Corporate Asset Management Committee for Pulte Homes, Inc.

“NATA continues to attract knowledgeable industry leaders to help provide unsurpassed governance for our association. We look forward to working with these gifted leaders as we reposition NATA within the industry and in Washington,” stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks.

Click here to view the full list of the NATA Board of Directors.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

Letter to IRS

Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:23:00 GMT

April 19, 2013

Courier’s Desk
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2013-22)
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224

VIA EMAIL: Notice.Comments@irscounsel.treas.gov

Re: Recommendations for 2013-2014 Guidance Priority List (Notice 2013-22)
Transportation of Persons by Air: Taxability of Aircraft Management Fees Under I.RC. § 4261

Dear Sir and/or Madam:

This letter is submitted by the National Business Aviation Association (“NBAA”) and the National Air Transportation Association (“NATA”) in response to the invitation published in Notice 2013-22 for recommendation of items for inclusion on the 2013-2014 Guidance Priority List. NBAA represents more than 9,000 member companies and is the leading organization for companies that own or operate general aviation aircraft to make their businesses more efficient, productive and successful. NATA is the leading organization representing over 2,000 owners and operators of aviation service businesses such as fixed base operators, charter providers, maintenance and repair organizations, and aircraft management companies.

For the reasons discussed below, we respectfully request that the Internal Revenue Service ("Service") issue clear and precise guidance to determine if an aircraft management company providing certain services to an aircraft owner is providing taxable air transportation under I.R.C. § 4261.

While this letter outlines our request at a high level we have previously provided officials in the Service’s Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) with additional details as to possible guidance. We look forward to discussing our previous submissions in more detail as part of the priority guidance process.

Existing Guidance on Taxability of Aircraft Management Fees

For over 60 years there has been a recognized lack of clear and precise guidance as to the applicability of the Federal Excise Tax (“FET”) on air transportation to aircraft management companies and their customers. For example, in Rev. Rul. 58-215, 1958-1, C.B. 439, the IRS determined that “since the corporation owns the aircraft, has exclusive control over the aircraft’s personnel, pays the operating expenses of the aircraft, and maintains liability and risk insurance and the airline operates the aircraft as an agent for the corporation,” the airline company was not providing taxable transportation and thus the corporation’s payments to the airline company were not subject to FET.

However, the Service also issued an outlier ruling, Rev. Rul. 74-123, 1974-1 C.B. 31, where a government agency was required to pay FET for fees the agency paid to a charter company for transporting government personnel both on aircraft owned by the charter company and on government owned- aircraft. At the request of the Service we previously provided a detailed explanation contrasting the facts and conclusions in Rev. Rul. 74-123 with a typical aircraft management arrangement.

The publication of the Excise Tax- Air Transportation Audit Technique Guide (“ATG”) in 2008 created further confusion as it described aircraft management arrangements in ways that are inconsistent with how the industry functions. Publication of the ATG generated increased audit activity but did not provide the aircraft management industry with clear and precise guidance as to FET applicability.

Finally, the Chief Counsel Advice (“CCA”) memorandum (Number: 201210026, released March 9, 2012) ignored this conflicting guidance and took the approach that virtually all amounts paid by an aircraft owner to a management company are subject to FET. Since the publication of the CCA, NBAA and NATA have observed that virtually any business aviation company engaged in providing aircraft management services is subject to audit. The expense incurred by the Service to undertake these audits, and by the taxpayer to defend the audits, is significant and clearly not the best use of resources by either party.

Requirement for Clear and Precise Guidance

Management companies are typically small and mid-sized companies that may manage one or two aircraft each and do not have significant financial resources. FET is a collected tax causing the management companies to be secondarily liable for the tax. With the enforcement position currently being taken by the Service, management companies are often found liable for FET not only on payments by current customers but also on payments by previous customers. With the lack of clear and precise guidance on this issue, aircraft management companies have not typically collected FET from owners conducting non-commercial flights for themselves on their own aircraft. These owners may no longer own aircraft or may not even exist, making it impossible for management companies to collect retroactive taxes. Management companies simply cannot continue as going concerns with the retroactive tax liabilities being imposed by the Service during audits.

In Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 21 (1978)—which involved the scope of an employer’s secondary liability for allegedly failing to withhold and deposit employment taxes on an employee’s “wages”—the Supreme Court explained that when a taxpayer (the employer in that case) acts as the Government’s tax collector, its collection and deposit obligations must be clear at the time the taxpayer is required to collect the tax. Thus, a person in a secondary liability position is protected by the Central Illinois principle from liability for failing to collect the tax from the person primarily liable for the tax when it lacks a contemporaneous “precise and not speculative” notice of its duty to collect the tax.

In the context of FET, aircraft management companies have not been provided with guidance that is clear as to their requirements for serving as the government’s deputy tax collector. Aircraft management companies are left to try and make sense of conflicting IRS rulings and have no explanation as to how the Service actually determines FET applicability.

Apply Common Law Principles of Leasing to Determine if Aircraft Owner has Transferred Possession, Command and Control of Aircraft to Management Company

In general, to provide taxable air transportation, a person must provide both the aircraft and the pilot services for the flight. In order to provide the aircraft, the person must have possession, command and control of the aircraft. It is possible to have possession, command and control of the aircraft by owning the aircraft or by leasing it from another person.

Based on several meetings with the Service on this issue, we understand that they agree that a clear standard is needed to determine when taxable air transportation is provided. Since obtaining possession, command and control of the aircraft is necessary to provide taxable air transportation, focusing on this element in developing a test seems to be logical.

Under common law principles, an aircraft owner has the exclusive right to possession, command, and control of its aircraft. Furthermore, under common law principles, a lease of an aircraft can be by means of an actual lease or a constructive lease. Common law principles apply to determine, on a flight by flight basis, whether the owner has transferred possession, command, and control of its aircraft to another person under a constructive lease, or whether such other person is merely performing services with respect to the aircraft, e.g., pursuant to an aircraft management agreement. Petit Jean Air Service, Inc. v. United States, 33 A.F.T.R.2d 74-1526 (E.D. Ark. 1974, appeal not recommended, AOD 1975-33 (Mar. 27, 1974) (constructive lease found based on intent of the parties).

Using these common law principles and existing case law to determine whether an aircraft has in fact been actually or constructively leased to an aircraft management company will provide a clear test to determine whether the management company has obtained possession, command and control of the aircraft. Most aircraft management arrangements are simply service arrangements and the aircraft is not actually or constructively leased to the management company.

We have previously submitted an explanation regarding this constructive leasing standard to the Service’s Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) and look forward to discussing the concept further.

Requested Guidance

Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Service provide guidance that creates a clear standard, consistent with applicable law, to determine when taxable air transportation is being provided. In our opinion, the constructive leasing standard discussed above may serve as a good starting point for such guidance.

We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this issue with appropriate officials from the Service and Department of the Treasury.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,
Ed Bolen                                                      Thomas L. Hendricks
President and CEO                                        President and CEO
National Business Aviation Association          National Air Transportation Association

cc: Lisa Zarlenga, Tax Legislative Counsel, U.S. Department of the Treasury Curt Wilson, Associate Chief Counsel, Passthroughs and Special Industries, IRS

Click here to view a pdf of the letter.
Click here for more information.

FCC Rulemaking on Emergency Locator Transmitters

Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:51:00 GMT

FCC Rulemaking on Emergency Locator Transmitters

March 26, 2013

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued proposed rules that could affect the use of Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT) that broadcast solely on 121.5 MHz. The FCC’s proposed rules would ban the manufacture, sale and importation of any ELT that broadcasts solely on 121.5 MHz. Additionally, the FCC stated that its ultimate goal is a prohibition on the use of those ELTs. The FCC noted in a recent meeting with industry that it believes it could include such a ban when finalizing this proposed rule.

The FCC has very little data regarding the impact such a ban on the use of existing 121.5 ELTs would have on general aviation and small businesses. As part of its formal comments to the FCC, NATA intends to provide specific information and data on the impact such a ban would have.

The association has developed a simple member survey to assist in gathering data regarding the impact that a ban on 121.5 ELTs would have. If you or your company own or operate aircraft, we ask that you take 10 minutes and complete the member survey by clicking on the link below. The data obtained through this survey will be vital in developing the association’s comments to the FCC.

To complete the NATA Member Survey on 121.5 MHz ELTS, visit www.surveymonkey.com/s/nataeltsurvey.

For additional information on this issue, please contact:
Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero
703-845-9000

Click here for more information.

APP Jet Center Hayward First to Complete NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit

Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:25:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

APP JET CENTER HAYWARD FIRST TO COMPLETE NATA SAFETY 1ST GROUND AUDIT

Alexandria, VA, April 16, 2013 – National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA) Safety 1^st is pleased to announce that APP Jet Center in Hayward, California has become the first company listed on the NATA Ground Audit Registry. NATA’s Safety 1^st Ground Audit program was created to provide a consistent operational safety standard for fixed base operators, airports, and other facilities providing ground-handling services to business and general aviation aircraft.

APP Jet Center’s completion of the Safety 1^st Ground Audit, and their listing on the audit registry, indicate the high level of emphasis APP Hayward’s managers and employees place on safety and quality.

“Preparing for, conducting and following up on the Safety 1^st Ground Audit was beyond educational and has allowed us to view our business as something more than just a provider of fuel and ground services. Flight crews, flight departments, and aircraft managers are part of a highly regulated world, and are recognized for that. Putting forth the work to be listed on the Safety 1^st Ground Audit Registry has made us feel like we are a more integral part of perpetuating safety in the industry and not just a firm selling fuel and towing aircraft,” said APP Jet Center Vice President of Operations Christopher A. Hambleton.

“The NATA Safety 1^st Ground Audit is an unprecedented opportunity for our FBO members to take a rigorous look at their operation as a whole, figure out where improvements in safety need to be made, and ensure that those changes are implemented. We applaud the effort put forth by APP Jet Center Hayward to complete the Ground Audit and achieve listing on the Ground Audit Registry,” said NATA Manager of Safety 1^st Programs Elizabeth Nicholson.

For more information about the NATA Safety 1^st Ground Audit, click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Continues Battling for Small Businesses Against User Fee Proposal

Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:18:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA CONTINUES BATTLING FOR SMALL BUSINESSES AGAINST USER FEE PROPOSAL

Alexandria, VA, April 8, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) opposes a highly anticipated aviation user fee proposal expected to be included in the Obama Administration's fiscal year 2014 budget submission to the Congress later this week. The user fee would require all air transportation providers (commercial airlines and general aviation operators) to pay a $100 per-flight fee.

Last week, 223 Members of Congress, including U.S. House of Representatives Aviation Subcommittee Chairman Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Ranking Member Rick Larsen (D-WA), and GA Caucus Co-chairs Sam Graves (R-MO) and John Barrow (D-GA), sent a letter to the President opposing the per-flight user fee.

Congress and the aviation industry are unanimously opposed to the imposition of an aviation user fee. Over the past five years, Members of Congress in the House and the U.S. Senate and industry coalitions and aviation associations sent numerous letters to the administration to reiterate that per-flight user fees will cripple the general aviation industry and the small businesses it represents. The most recent letter concluded by asking that this idea be abandoned once and for all.

User fees would devastate small businesses and organizations around the country that depend on general aviation. The imposition of a user fee would also be detrimental to the many states with little or no commercial airline service where general aviation plays an integral economic role.

“Establishing a per-flight user fee would have enormous negative economic consequences on the general aviation industry,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “We believe the current method of collecting revenues through a per-gallon fuel tax is the most stable, efficient, and equitable source of funding for the Federal Aviation Administration.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Disappointed in President's Budget Proposal

Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:39:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA DISAPPOINTED IN PRESIDENT’S BUDGET PROPOSAL
Urges Congress to Oppose Provisions Detrimental to General Aviation Businesses and Jobs

Alexandria, VA, April 10, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) expressed disappointment in the Obama Administration’s fiscal year 2014 budget proposal released today, which includes a $100 per flight user fee on general aviation as well as a change in the current tax depreciation schedule for general aviation aircraft.

“NATA is very disappointed that the President has once again proposed costly user fees on general aviation. This idea has been rejected by Congress on several occasions and NATA and the entire general aviation industry will continue to work hard to ensure that the user fee proposal doesn’t see the light of day. We need to embrace ideas that create jobs, reduce burdens imposed on businesses, and improve our Nation’s economy. This user fee proposal will kill jobs, create burdens on businesses, and dampen our economy,” said President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks.

A letter opposing user fees on general aviation, signed by 223 bipartisan Members of Congress, and sent to the President last week mentioned that the proposal should be abandoned once and for all.

The President proposes a $3.77 trillion budget for next fiscal year, which begins on October 1st, 2013. According to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan the President’s budget proposal raises taxes by $1.1 trillion, increases spending over current levels by $964 billion, and adds $8.2 trillion to our nation’s debt.

FAA Administrator Michael Huerta informed NATA and other aviation stakeholders on a conference call today that the President’s budget, with respect to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), proposes to fund the Agency at $15.6 billion in fiscal year 2014.

The President also proposes to increase the depreciation recovery period for general aviation airplanes, such as corporate jets, from its current five years to seven years. “This would be another hit on general aviation that simply doesn’t do much in terms of deficit reduction but would certainly have a negative impact on the aircraft manufacturing sector and we will continue to urge Congress to dispose of this proposal as well,” concluded Hendricks.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

FAA Delays Tower Closure Date

Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:43:00 GMT

Membership Update

FAA Delays Tower Closure Date

April 5, 2013

Today, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced its decision to delay the closure of 149 federal contract towers until June 15th. Click here to read the FAA's press release.

Click here for more information.

NATA Announces Recipients of the 2013 AMT Employer Recognition Awards

Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:39:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA ANNOUNCES RECIPIENTS OF THE 2013 AMT EMPLOYER RECOGNITION AWARDS

Alexandria, VA, March 29, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce the recipients of the 2013 AMT Employer Recognition Awards. The association presents these awards annually to companies that employ aviation maintenance technicians (AMT) and provide a minimum number of hours of new or recurrent training to those AMTs on an annual basis. Award winners receive either a one, three or five star award depending on the percentage of employed AMTs receiving the minimum training.

For 2013, three companies received the one star award, four companies received the three star award and 24 companies received the five star award. “I commend all of the 2013 AMT Employer Recognition Award winners for their dedication to training and to fostering their employees’ success,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “These companies have shown that they value well-trained, competent AMTs and deserve to be recognized as leaders in our industry.”

The full list of 2013 AMT Employer Recognition Award winners is available at www.nata.aero/Awards/AMT-Award. NATA presented the 2013 award for training that occurred during calendar year 2012.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

Bruce Whitman Recipient of NATA's Ong Memorial Award

Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:15:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

BRUCE WHITMAN RECIPIENT OF NATA’S ONG MEMORIAL AWARD

Alexandria, VA, March 20, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that Bruce N. Whitman, President and CEO of FlightSafety International, is the recipient of the association’s William A. “Bill” Ong Memorial Award.

NATA annually recognizes individuals, offices, and organizations demonstrating excellence in their field and the highest level of customer service. NATA's Industry Excellence Awards are given to exceptional individuals and organizations that have helped improve the general aviation community. The William A. “Bill” Ong Memorial Award is named in honor and memory of the association’s co-founder and first president, and is given for extraordinary achievement and extended meritorious service to the general aviation industry.

Bruce Whitman joined FlightSafety International in 1961 as Assistant to the President after two years as Senior Executive Assistant with the National Business Aircraft Association. Later that year, he was elected Vice President and a Director of the company. In 1962, he was named Executive Vice President and was promoted to his present position in 2003. He is an aviation veteran of nearly six decades and is considered among the industry’s most dedicated leaders.

He was commissioned a 2nd Lieutenant in the United States Air Force and earned the triple ratings of pilot, navigator and bombardier serving in the Strategic Air Command.

Mr. Whitman currently serves on a number of boards and foundations including Co-Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Nominating Committee of the Congressional Medal of Honor Foundation, the Air Charter Safety Foundation Board of Governors, Board Member of the Corporate Angel Network, Director Emeritus of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, Vice Chairman of the Air Force Academy Falcon Foundation, President of The Wings Club, Trustee and member of the Executive Committee of the National World War II Museum, and several others.

The NATA Board of Directors unanimously selected Mr. Whitman to receive this prestigious honor. “NATA and its members congratulate Bruce and thank him for his tireless efforts and commitment to the general aviation industry,” said NATA President and CEO Tom Hendricks.

The award will be presented during the NATA Industry Excellence Awards Dinner on April 22 at the Renaissance Capital View in Arlington, Virginia. The dinner will be held in conjunction with the association's Aviation Business & Legislative Conference.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Wings for Warriors

Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:48:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA WINGS FOR WARRIORS
Giving Back to Our Combat Wounded Veterans

Alexandria, VA, March 22, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is proud to announce its continued partnership with the Veterans Airlift Command (VAC) to help provide air transportation to our Nation’s combat wounded veterans and their families.

The brave men and women who have been wounded in combat are often in need of ongoing medical treatment far from their homes, loved ones, and fellow soldiers. VAC coordinates the transportation of these wounded veterans and their families utilizing a network of volunteer aircraft owners and pilots who donate their time and equipment. Today, the VAC consists of over 2,200 aircraft owners and pilot volunteers.

This year, NATA and its members will support the VAC through a special fund, NATA Wings for Warriors, which allows NATA members to donate time and needed funds to the organization.

“NATA members will continue to be significant partners in this meaningful and rewarding endeavor. Our dedication to supporting the efforts of the VAC is a token of our sincere appreciation to these brave soldiers who have sacrificed so much on the field of battle,” said NATA President and CEO Tom Hendricks. Last year, NATA and its members generously contributed more than $15,000 to the Veterans Airlift Command.

What can you do to help?

Make a personal or corporate contribution to the NATA Wings for Warriors, click here.
Share the VAC mission with fractional owners and card program members. Ask them to donate unused flight hours to the VAC.
Give a corporate gift of flight hours to the VAC, click here.

You can show your support for the VAC at NATA’s 2013 events including the Aviation Business and Legislative Conference to be held April 22 – 23, and the Air Charter Summit to be held June 17 – 19. For more information on these events, click here.

For the latest news on the VAC and to read stories from veterans and their families regarding the critical work of the VAC, click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Announces Industry Excellence Awards Recipients

Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:47:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA ANNOUNCES INDUSTRY EXCELLENCE AWARDS RECIPIENTS

Alexandria, VA, March 29, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) today announced the recipients of its Industry Excellence Awards given annually to individuals, offices, and organizations that have helped improve the general aviation community by demonstrating excellence in their field and the highest level of customer service.

NATA will present awards to the following five recipients:

Curt Epstein, Staff Editor of Aviation International News (AIN), will receive the Aviation Journalism Award that identifies a journalist, writer, or publication excelling in consumer education or editorial support in the FBO/Air Charter industry. Mr. Epstein is an excellent representative of the profession, providing timely and topical coverage on the day-to-day workings of the business and general aviation industry. He is fair and accurate, two important attributes that help define his writing and reporting skills and make him a trusted industry journalist.

The Charlotte Flight Standards District Office (EA-68) will be the recipient of NATA's FAA Customer Service Excellence Award and recognized as an FAA facility that has represented the highest degree of customer service and elevated the quality of interaction between the FAA and aircraft maintenance and repair facilities, Part 135 certificate holders, airport service organizations, and flight schools. The Charlotte office’s exceptional customer service and support in its efforts to assist the certificated entities in its region to ensure safety and continued growth were key to its nomination for the award. The Charlotte office is often recognized for its professionalism and its ability to address inquiries in a timely manner and with a commonsense approach.

The ATP/NATA General Aviation Service Technician Award (sponsored by Aircraft Technical Publishers) acknowledges the exceptional performance of a licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic or radio repairman who has practiced his or her craft for a period of 20 or more years. NATA will present this year’s award to Mr. Greg Paxson, Director of Maintenance for TWC Aviation, for his more than 30 years of management and technical expertise in the aircraft maintenance field. Mr. Paxson’s extensive commitment to the industry includes providing thoughtful and trustworthy client service, championing continuing education and training, and promoting professionalism and strong teamwork. He not only represents the best of the maintenance field, but also uses his knowledge and enthusiasm to mentor and encourage future generations of aviation maintenance professionals.

Christopher U. Browne, Vice President and Airport Manager of Washington Dulles International Airport, is this year's recipient of the NATA Airport Executive Partnership Award. The Airport Executive Partnership Award recognizes an airport manager for his or her outstanding efforts to foster relationships between aviation businesses and airport operators. Mr. Browne’s cooperative approach to airport management helps to assure the highest levels of safety, security, service and success for all involved. He embraces all facets of the airport community and creates an environment of cooperation and harmony.

Maria Canosa, President, and Vinny Billisi, Vice President and Director of Operations, of Airborne Systems Flight School will receive the Excellence In Pilot Training Award for their outstanding contributions in safety, professionalism, leadership, and excellence in the field of pilot training. Ms. Canosa and Mr. Billisi have trained more than 2,000 students and have issued more than 3,500 certificates and ratings since Airborne Systems Flight School opened in 1992. Their FAA-141-approved training facility is a Cessna Pilot Center that focuses on safety and the individual needs of its students. Their state-of-the-art pilot training program and high standards have helped their students achieve positions in airline, business and general aviation fields.

"NATA is pleased to recognize these highly recommended individuals for their dedication, professionalism, and commitment to the industry," said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. "We are also proud of their focus on perpetuating the safety of general aviation collectively as well as in their individual fields."

NATA will present the awards during the NATA Industry Excellence Awards Dinner on April 22 at the Renaissance Capital View in Arlington, Virginia. The association will hold the dinner in conjunction with its Aviation Business & Legislative Conference.

Contact Diane Gleason at dgleason@nata.aero for more information on NATA's Industry Excellence Awards Dinner and Presentation and to secure tickets.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

NATA Updates Member Committee Structure

Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:46:00 GMT

Member Update
NATA Updates Member Committee Structure

March 21, 2013

With the first NATA member committee meetings of 2013 just over a month away, the association has completed a restructuring of the member committees to more closely align with NATA’s strategic goals. Under the revised structure, the following committees will exist:

Airport Business Committee – This committee will focus on the challenges and opportunities faced by businesses operating on an airport, including FBOs, repair stations, charter operators and other aeronautical service and support operations. The Airport Business Committee will initially include members of the previous Airports, Business Management and Environmental Committees.
Air Charter Committee – This committee will remain unchanged and continue to focus on issues affecting Part 135 on-demand charter and Part 91K operations.
Aircraft Maintenance and Systems Technology Committee – This committee will also remain unchanged and continue to focus on issues affecting aircraft maintenance and certificated repair stations.
Safety 1st Committee – The Safety 1st committee will consist of members of the previous Safety and Security Committee and will provide input and advice on NATA’s highly successful Safety 1st programs.
Flight Training Committee – This committee will remain unchanged and continue to focus on issues impacting flight training providers, including certificated and non-certificated flight schools and Part 142 training centers.

NATA’s member committees are open to all members and work to advance the objectives outlined in the NATA Strategic Plan, while also serving as a forum where member companies can:

Provide input to the association on the key issues affecting aviation businesses and guidance on the course the association takes in addressing those issues
Leverage industry expertise to create products that provide a general benefit to the association membership
Network with other aviation business professionals, industry leaders and key government officials

The Airport Business, Air Charter, Aircraft Maintenance and Safety 1st Committees will hold in-person meetings on Wednesday, April 24, following the conclusion of NATA’s Aviation Business & Legislative Conference.

To register for the 2013 Spring Committee Meetings please use this form or register online by clicking here.

Location for Committee Meetings and Guest Room Block:
Renaissance Capital View-Crystal City
2800 S. Potomac Avenue
Arlington, VA 22202
Tel: (703) 413-1300

NATA has discounted rooms at $229++ plus tax, for single/double occupancy. The discounted rate is guaranteed until Monday, April 1 after which the hotel rack rate will be charged. Online reservations are available from the NATA website, www.nata.aero. The hotel is conveniently located 10 minutes from Ronald Reagan National Airport (DCA).

The Aviation Business & Legislative Conference will be held April 22-23 at the Renaissance Capital View. Attached is the conference advance brochure for your review. Registration for the two-day conference for members is $620 and includes the NATA Industry Excellence Awards Dinner and Presentation and the Congressional Reception at the United States Capitol.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

FAA Releases Contract Tower Closure List

Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:45:00 GMT

Member Update
FAA Releases Contract Tower Closure List

March 22, 2013

Today, the Federal Aviation Administration released its decision to begin a four-week phased closure of 149 contract towers beginning on April 7. In early March, FAA proposed to close 189 contract control towers as part of its plan to meet the $637 million in cuts required under budget sequestration.

A list of the towers slated for closure can be viewed here. The FAA has determined that due to the negative impact on the national interest, 24 federal contract towers will remain open that had been previously proposed for closure. Additionally, the agency determined that 16 contract towers in the cost-share program will remain open until September 30.

FAA Administrator Huerta said that the administration will work with the airports and the operators to ensure that procedures are in place to maintain a high-level of safety at non-towered airports.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

##TrackImpression##
Click here for more information.

Federal Excise Tax Working Group Update

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:01:00 GMT

Member Update
Federal Excise Tax Working Group Update

March 28, 2013

NATA scheduled and held an IRS-FET working group meeting with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on March 26th to discuss the conclusions reached by the Service that are contrary to several long-standing commercial Federal Excise Tax (FET) revenue rulings – namely that commercial FET is applicable to the amounts paid by aircraft owners for contracted aircraft management services.

The NATA and NBAA working group was fortunate to have the expertise and counsel of Marian Epps of Epps Aviation, and Nel Stubbs of Conklin & de Decker on-hand to join the group.

After a productive meeting, IRS officials now concur that there is a need to provide clear and precise guidance and that the current set of available official documents are not adequate.

In our most productive meeting to date, the working group explained in great detail how the aviation services industry functions, the interrelationships with FAA standards (Part 91 versus Part 135), and how the owner of an aircraft interacts with a management company, in contrast to a charter customer.

The working group will now propose that this issue be placed on the Agency’s Guidance Priority List. This list is used by the IRS to prioritize tax issues that need to be addressed through regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices and other forms of official guidance.

In addition, NATA is scheduling an upcoming meeting for the working group and the IRS audit division to discuss the possibilities of putting a hold on audits until the IRS issues clarity and precision for our industry.

A special thanks to Marian Epps and Nel Stubbs for their time, expertise, and engagement on this matter.

We will keep you updated on our efforts.

Jim Coon
Executive Vice President
NATA
(703) 845-9000

Click here for more information.

Moran Amendment Blocked: Contract Tower Closures Imminent

Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:37:00 GMT

Member Update
Moran Amendment Blocked
Contract Tower Closures Imminent

March 20, 2013

Today, the Senate approved its version of the Continuing Funding Resolution. This legislation would fund the federal government for the remainder of fiscal year 2013. The House of Representatives is expected to approve the Senate passed bill in the coming days.

The FAA will now proceed with its plan to close down the contract tower program and announced that it would provide its final list of tower closures on Friday, March 22nd. The closures are expected to start in early April.

NATA would like to thank Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) for his leadership and efforts on this matter and all of you who engaged your respective Senators. Unfortunately, despite a strong and coordinated grass roots effort from the airport and general aviation communities, the contract tower program fell victim to the sequestration process and the larger political debate on federal spending.

Other Senators who cosponsored the Moran Amendment include Pryor (D-AR), Blumenthal (D-CT), Warner (D-VA), Merkley (D-OR), Wyden (D-OR) Klobuchar (D-MN), Hagan (D-NC), Shaheen (D-NH), Kaine (D-VA), Manchin (D-WV), Baucus (D-MT), Tester (D-MT), Rockefeller (D-WV), Moran (R-KS), Roberts (R-KS), Inhofe (R-OK), Kirk (R-IL), Blunt (R-MO), Boozman (R-AR), Ayotte (R-NH), Johanns (R-NE), Crapo (R-ID), Enzi (R-WY), Wicker (R-MS), Vitter (R-LA), Risch (R-ID).

We will provide you with the FAA’s closure list as soon as it becomes available.

Click here for more information.

Membership Update - Contract Tower Program

Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:29:00 GMT

Membership Update

March 19, 2013

Senate leadership has blocked Senator Jerry Moran’s (R-KS) amendment from being considered on the Senate floor during debate on the Continuing Funding Resolution. As you know, the Continuing Funding Resolution provides funding for the federal government through September 30th of this year. The Moran amendment seeks to stop the FAA’s plans to shutter the contract tower program under the sequestration (automatic cuts) process.

As a result of a strong grassroots effort, the Moran amendment has 26 bipartisan cosponsors in the Senate (including 14 Democrats and 12 Republicans). NATA and other aviation organizations have all worked and advocated for a common sense approach to reducing federal spending under sequestration, including equitable reductions in the contract tower program. Unfortunately, it appears at this point that the contract tower program has been caught in the larger political budget battle going on in Washington.

Although his options are limited because of Senate procedural rules, Senator Moran and others continue to push for a Senate floor vote.

If the Moran amendment is not included in the final Continuing Funding Resolution, currently being debated in the Senate, the FAA will announce this Friday, March 22nd, the closing of nearly 200 contract towers across the country.

Click here for more information.

Membership Update - Contract Tower Program

Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:40:00 GMT

Membership Update

March 15, 2013

The Senate continues to debate the Continuing Funding Resolution. The Moran Amendment that would avoid shuttering the contract tower program and require the FAA to more fairly and equitably redistribute funding reductions has yet to be considered by the Senate. The amendment, however, is gaining momentum and bipartisan support. If you haven't called your Senators urging their support for the Moran amendment, please do so.

Also, below is an email from FAA Chief Operating Officer David Grizzle regarding the contract tower program and the FAA's decision to delay an announcement of its final decision on which towers it will cease to fund. This delay in the announcement is a result of the large number of explanations received from stakeholders regarding adverse effects to the national interest in closing certain towers.

From: David.Grizzle@faa.gov
Date: March 15, 2013, 1:36:40 PM EDT
Subject: Update -- FAA Contract Tower Program

As you are aware, the FAA has offered to airport sponsors for 189 airports within the FAA's contract tower program the opportunity to explain why the elimination of funding for the tower operations at their airports would adversely affect the national interest.

The FAA has received a very large number of responses. In order to review comprehensively the submission on behalf of each airport, the FAA will delay the date of its final decision and announcement of which airport tower operations it intends to cease to fund. The FAA will make that announcement on March 22, 2013.

J. David Grizzle
Chief Operating Officer
Federal Aviation Administration
800 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20591

Click here for more information.

Letter to Senator Moran in Support of Amendment to Continuing Resolution

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:36:00 GMT

March 12, 2013

Senator Jerry Moran
Senate Russell 354
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Moran,

On behalf of more than 2,000 owners and operators of aviation businesses across the country, I write in support of your amendment to the Continuing Resolution for fiscal year 2013 that would ensure the contract tower program is subjected to fair and equitable funding reductions as a result of sequestration.

As you know, under the FAA’s current sequestration plan, programs, projects, and activities will be reduced by 5% while the contract tower program will shoulder a 75% reduction (189 contract towers out of 251 total contract towers). This dramatic cut will most certainly have a negative impact on safety, emergency medical operations, and some military flights.

The contract tower program is one of the most successful and cost effective programs under the FAA’s purview. Your efforts will help ensure that the contract tower program is not shuttered and will equitably distribute reductions in spending among other FAA programs in a sensible and fair manner.

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is the voice of aviation business and represents the owners and operators of Fixed Based Operators (FBOs), general aviation maintenance and repair organizations, fuel distributors, air charter companies, and other services support companies across the country.

Sincerely,

Thomas L. Hendricks

President and CEO

Click here for more information.

Support the Moran Amendment to the Continuing Resolution

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:57:00 GMT

Action Call
Support the Moran Amendment to the Continuing Resolution
Help Save the Contract Tower Program

March 12, 2013

The United States Senate is expected today to begin consideration of a Continuing Resolution that would provide funding for the federal government through September 30th of this year.

Last week, we asked you to call your Senators to support the contract tower program and to apply spending reductions at the FAA in a fair and equitable manner. Senators began to hear from many across the country and now Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) and other Senators plan to offer a bipartisan amendment to the Continuing Resolution. The amendment ensures that the contract tower program is subjected to funding reductions similar to what other programs at the FAA are taking under sequestration.

As you know, the FAA plans to close 189 contract towers starting in early April. The Moran amendment would provide for a 5% reduction to the contract tower program and require the FAA to equitably allocate reductions in spending in other areas of the FAA.

Please call your U.S. Senators today and request that they support the Moran Amendment to the Continuing Resolution.

Please click on the link for phone numbers of your Senators;
United States Senate

Click here for more information.

Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program

Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:31:00 GMT

Action Call
Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program

We have mentioned over the last few weeks that as a result of a budget impasse and the subsequent sequestration the FAA plans to close 238 air traffic control towers across the country, including 189 towers that are included in the contract tower program. These tower closures are scheduled to begin in early April.

While NATA supports efforts to rein in federal spending, we also believe that reductions should be done fairly and equitably.

Programs, projects, and activities of the FAA will be reduced by 5% while the contract tower program will shoulder a 75% reduction (189 contract towers out of 251 total contract towers). This dramatic cut will most certainly have a negative impact on safety, emergency medical operations, and some military flights.

The Contract Tower Program costs approximately $130 million a year. With a cut similar to what other FAA programs are taking under sequestration, the contract tower program would be reduced by $6.5 million. However, because the program is not a “line item” in the budget, the FAA decided to cut $45 million to $50 million from the program and reduce the number of contract towers by 75%.

Contact the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to request that they step back from their current plans to target the contract tower program for disproportional cuts that could lead to tower closures. Reductions in the FAA’s budget should be done fairly, equitably, and without impeding safety.

Also, contact your respective Member of Congress and Senators. Ask them to call and work with their Leaders in the House and Senate to develop a legislative solution that will ensure that the Contract Tower Program be treated as a “line item” program within the FAA’s budget.

Ask your respective Member and Senators to call and work with the following Members of Congress to equitably make these spending reductions.

HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE – Chairman Hal Rogers, Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Tom Latham, Ranking Member Nita Lowey and Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee Ranking Member Ed Pastor.

HOUSE TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE – Chairman Bill Shuster, Aviation Subcommittee Chairman Frank LoBiondo, Ranking Member Nick Rahall, and Aviation Subcommittee Ranking Member Rick Larsen.

SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE – Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, Transportation Subcommittee Chairwoman Patty Murray, Ranking Member Richard Shelby, and Transportation Subcommittee Ranking Member Susan Collins.

SENATE COMMERCE COMMITTEE – Chairman Jay Rockefeller, Aviation Subcommittee Chairwoman Maria Cantwell, Ranking Member John Thune and Aviation Subcommittee Ranking Member Kelly Ayotte.

HOUSE GENERAL AVIATION CAUCUS – Co-Chairs, Representative Sam Graves and Representative John Barrow

SENATE GENERAL AVIATION CAUCUS – Co-Chairs, Senator Mark Begich and Senator Mike Johanns
CONGRESS

Please click on the links for phone numbers of your Congressional delegation;
United States House of Representatives
United States Senate

FAA
You can contact the FAA toll free at 1-866-835-5322 and press #8 for additional information. FAA Administrator Michael Huerta can be reached at 202-267-3111. Or visit the FAA website.

Staff Contact: Jim Coon
Executive Vice President
jcoon@nata.aero
703-845-9000

Click here for more information.

Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program - Call Your Senators Today

Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:31:00 GMT

Action Call
Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program - Call Your Senators Today

March 7, 2013

Please call your U.S. Senators today and urge them to treat the contract tower program equitably and fairly with respect to the FAA's plans to shutter the program as a result of sequestration.

Yesterday, the House of Representatives took the first step in averting a government shutdown and approved a Continuing Resolution (CR) that will fund the government through September 30th. Now, the Senate is expected to begin consideration of a CR and any differences to the House passed version will need to be reconciled before it can be sent to the President for signature. NATA has been working to educate Members of Congress on the impact of the Obama Administration's decision to close 75% of the contract towers. While many lawmakers are sympathetic the House ultimately decided to keep any changes in cuts focused on restoring or reducing cuts in defense and veterans' programs and activities.

Under the Obama Administration's current proposal, FAA programs, projects, and activities will be reduced by 5% while the contract tower program will shoulder a 75% reduction (189 contract towers out of 251 total contract towers). This dramatic cut will most certainly have a negative impact on safety, emergency medical operations, and some military flights.

The contract tower program is one of the most successful and cost effective programs under the FAA's purview and costs approximately $130 million annually. With a cut similar to what other FAA programs are taking under sequestration, the contract tower program would be reduced by $6.5 million. However, because the program is not a "line item" in the budget, the FAA decided to cut $50 million and reduce the number of contract towers across the country by 75%. As we are six months into the current fiscal year, at least half of the $130 million has already been expended. Therefore, this additional cut essentially shuts down the contract tower program.

We are quickly running out of time and the current partisan atmosphere in Washington over sequestration is not helping. However, including language in the Senate CR that identifies the contract tower program as a "line item" will then require the FAA to equitably distribute funding reductions in a fair and reasonable manner. Please make your calls today.

Please click on the links for phone numbers of your Senators;
United States Senate

Staff Contact: Jim Coon
Executive Vice President
jcoon@nata.aero
703-845-9000

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

Click here for more information.

Membership Update - Potential Cuts in FAA Programs

Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:37:00 GMT

Membership Update

February 22, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and FAA Administrator Michael Huerta sent a letter today to aviation stakeholders regarding potential cuts in FAA programs should Congress and the White House not reach agreement on a budget deal. If an agreement cannot be reached, then automatic spending cuts (sequestration) will begin to take place starting March 1st. Below are links outlining reductions and operational changes under consideration by the FAA.

Aviation organizations will meet with FAA officials next week to gather additional information on how these potential cuts may affect general aviation. We will keep you informed as this situation progresses.

www.faa.gov/news/updates/media/2013_02_22_10_00_10.pdf
www.faa.gov/news/updates/media/Facilities_Where_Shifts_Could_Be_Eliminated.pdf
www.faa.gov/news/updates/media/Facilities_Could_Be_Closed.pdf

Click here for more information.

Membership Update - Sequestration

Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:37:00 GMT

Membership Update

February 27, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation Deputy Secretary John Porcari and FAA Administrator Michael Huerta briefed NATA and other aviation organizations on the impending FAA budget cuts (sequestration) should Congress and the Obama administration not reach an agreement by Friday, March 1st. NATA Executive Vice President Jim Coon attended the meeting.

FAA Administrator Huerta readily admitted that general aviation is taking a disproportionate hit with respect to towers slated for closure (189 contract towers and 49 FAA towers). We provided the tower closure list to you last week and have included it here again for your review. Administrator Huerta also said that decisions were based on having the least amount of impact on the traveling public.

It does not appear that a budget agreement will be reached this week and the sequestration process will be put in motion on Friday.

Under sequestration, the FAA must cut nearly $627 million from its budget this fiscal year. At the end of this week, the FAA is poised to begin sending its employees 30-day notices regarding furloughs, tower closures, and reductions in other air traffic programs.

Any FAA employee furloughs or tower closures will not begin to take place until early April.

In the meantime, Congress and the Obama administration will need to continue efforts to resolve the budget debacle as the law that allows funding to operate our federal government expires on March 27th.

Click here for more information.

Potential Cuts in FAA Programs

Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:35:00 GMT

Membership Update

February 22, 2013

www.faa.gov/news/updates/media/2013_02_22_10_00_10.pdf
www.faa.gov/news/updates/media/Facilities_Where_Shifts_Could_Be_Eliminated.pdf
www.faa.gov/news/updates/media/Facilities_Could_Be_Closed.pdf

Click here for more information.

NATA Commends Fuller's Contributions to Industry

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:54:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA COMMENDS FULLER'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDUSTRY

Alexandria, VA, February 28, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) issued the following statement regarding today's announcement that Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) President and CEO Craig L. Fuller will step down from his position.

"Craig Fuller is and will continue to be a strong and compelling advocate for our industry. His ardent leadership over the past four years and his work on a number of key issues and programs including the "GA Serves America" initiative illustrate his determination and dedication to hundreds of thousands of private pilots across the Nation. Craig's lifelong passion for aviation has been evident throughout his tenure at AOPA and we appreciate his commitment and dedication to the general aviation community."

"On behalf of NATA, I thank Craig and wish him the best," stated NATA President and CEO Tom Hendricks.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

FBO Success Seminar: Spring Training Event

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:12:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

FBO SUCCESS SEMINAR: SPRING TRAINING EVENT
TWO-DAY SEMINAR SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 11 &12 IN LAS VEGAS

Alexandria, VA, February 21, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA) acclaimed FBO Success Seminar series heads to Las Vegas, Nevada, on March 11 and 12 as part of the association’s Spring Training Week.

Developed for FBO owners, operators, managers and financial personnel, this seminar focuses on maximizing profits, reducing expenses and improving FBO productivity and bottom-line performance.

This is the fifth year NATA will offer the FBO Success Seminar, and FBO industry veterans John Enticknap and Ron Jackson, principals of Aviation Business Strategies Group, will again facilitate the seminar.

“John Enticknap and Ron Jackson are dynamic speakers who have provided sage advice to aviation businesses for more than 20 years. I encourage anyone interested in making their FBO more productive and profitable to attend NATA’s FBO Success Seminar and to read Ron and John’s popular blog at www.acukwikalert.com,” said NATA Vice President Amy B. Koranda.

In addition to the 10 sessions addressing financial, operational and customer service productivity, the seminar also places an emphasis on networking with other FBOs and learning first-hand various best practices through lively roundtable discussions.

Registration for the FBO Success Seminar is accessible through the Event section of NATA’s website, www.nata.aero/springtraining, or by calling 703-845-9000. The cost for the three-day seminar is $650, and FBOs registering two or more attendees receive a 20% discount per registrant.

About Aviation Business Strategies Group
Aviation FBO service and marketing veterans John Enticknap and Ron Jackson founded Aviation Business Strategies Group (ABSG) in 2006. Their goal is to help aviation service companies, FBOs in particular, become more profitable by sharing and teaching their proprietary10 Steps to FBO Success. Through a series of seminars, workshops, webinars and personal business coaching, the team at ABSG has helped FBOs solve practical problems and create winning solutions. www.absggroup.com

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Releases 2013 Event Schedule

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:09:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA RELEASES 2013 EVENT SCHEDULE

Alexandria, VA, February 8, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce its 2013 schedule of conferences, committee meetings, educational opportunities and events.

"In 2013, NATA is taking a new approach to several of our events and programs. We are aligning our goals strategically and utilizing top talent to build and reposition the association in Washington,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “We invite you to attend our events to find out how we are successfully advocating for general aviation issues in Washington. These events will provide attendees a forum for obtaining the best training and knowledge in the industry."

2013 Calendar Overview

Conferences, Committee Meetings & Events

NATA Industry Excellence and Aviation Maintenance Technician Employer Awards Presentation and Dinner
April 22, Renaissance Capital View, Arlington, VA

Aviation Business & Legislative Conference
(formerly the FBO Leadership Conference)
April 22-23, Renaissance Capital View, Arlington, VA

Congressional Reception
April 23, The Capitol, Washington, D.C.

Presidents Council Dinner
April 23, Washington, D.C.

Spring Committee Meetings
April 24, Renaissance Capital View, Arlington, VA

Presidents Council Dinner
June 17, Dulles, VA

Air Charter Summit
June 17-19, Marriott, Dulles, VA

Fall Committee Meetings
September 23-24, TBD

Aviation Business Roundtable
November 13-15, Arlington, VA

Educational Seminars

NATA Spring Training Week
March 11-14, Las Vegas Hotel, Las Vegas, NV

FBO Success Seminar
March 11-12

Line Service Supervisor Training
Seminar
March 11-12

NATA Safety 1st Trainer Seminar
March 13

Environmental Compliance Seminar
March 14

NATA-Conklin & de Decker Commercial Operators Tax Seminar
August 6-7, Chicago, IL

Line Service Supervisor Training Seminar
NATA Safety 1st Trainer Seminar
September 24-26, TBD

Presidents Council
Visit www.nata.aero/presidentscouncil for an up-to-date schedule of Presidents Council activities and information on how to join.

Webinars
Visit www.nata.aero/webinars for an up-to-date schedule and a link to purchase archived webinars.

For updates on conferences, events, seminars, webinars, and the Presidents Council activities, please visit the NATA website at www.nata.aero/events or www.nata.aero/presidentscouncil. Sponsorship Opportunities are available by contacting Diane Gleason, Director of Conferences & Meetings, at dgleason@nata.aero or (703) 575-2050.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments on OSHA Regulations For Aircraft Cabin Crewmembers

Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:02:00 GMT

January 22, 2013

Docket Operations M-30

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12-140

West Building Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Delivered electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket No. FAA-2012-0953; Policy Statement on Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Aircraft Cabin Crewmembers

NATA appreciates the opportunity to comment on behalf of our members operating aircraft that are impacted by this proposed action. Following our review of the proposed policy statement, we conclude that the intended course of action, i.e. imposing Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations for any person whose work environment includes duties within an aircraft cabin while the aircraft is in operation, will impact our members conducting passenger and cargo flights in a commercial on-demand capacity and noncommercial flights under the operational control of an aircraft owner[1].

We conclude after our evaluation that the proposed course of action is ill-advised with respect to both commercial and noncommercial aircraft operations in that it fails to consider the safety ramifications this drastic shift could create and that it remains extremely unclear in the how the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to develop and enact these new requirements.

The lack of clarity makes it difficult to determine the true purpose behind the draft statement. If this policy is a document to explain that the FAA intends to move forward collaboratively with OSHA but that no actual changes to current practices are intended, NATA expects that prior to making any changes the FAA will evaluate and give public hearing to the issues articulated within these comments. If in fact this draft policy statement is actionable and intended to modify, replace or nullify the FAA’s 1975 notice wherein the agency asserted its sole authority over the aircraft cabin environment, then FAA cannot proceed until a full and proper rulemaking occurs.

Absent statements to the contrary, NATA must presume that the draft policy statement is indeed actionable and we are especially concerned that the proposed policy does not indicate how OSHA and the FAA will determine which OSHA standards may or may not have safety implications and whether such determinations will include industry representation from operators.

FAA Should Retain Primacy Role

While we respect the statutory obligation the FAA has under Section 829 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. Law 112-95), it is still well within the purview of the FAA to retain sole oversight for the in-aircraft environment rather than cede oversight and enforcement responsibilities to OSHA. OSHA does not have the appropriate skills to ensure that its regulations, policies and guidance do not have adverse airworthiness or operational safety implications for aircraft operations. Any OSHA activity will require substantial on-going interaction with the FAA to prevent such negative consequences and is more appropriately addressed by the FAA consulting with OSHA in the development of regulations promulgated by the FAA rather than what the FAA appears to propose; i.e. that the OSHA will take the lead in regulating.

This is supported by the FAA assertion in the draft policy statement that “[o]n the other hand, existing FAA regulations address the same hazards addressed by OSHA's sanitation standards, so those OSHA standards would not apply on aircraft.” The FAA is clear that when it has promulgated rules addressing an existing OSHA standard the FAA rules are adequate and there is no need to change course and apply the OSHA rules instead. Our recommendation is that the FAA continue on this course of pursuing its own rulemaking as appropriate rather than engage in a complex process to determine the necessity of OSHA rules and how to adapt them for environments that were not previously taken into consideration.

Jurisdictional Confusion

NATA is concerned that the shared jurisdiction policy described by the FAA is ripe for confusion and contradiction between FAA, OSHA and OSHA-approved state programs. As articulated in the FAA/OSHA Aviation Safety and Health Team Report published in December 2000 (hereafter referred to as the 2000 Report)[2], the OSHA Act encourages states to develop and operate their own job safety and health programs. This is in stark contrast to aviation oversight wherein no state may regulate aircraft operations and airworthiness standards. According to the OSHA website, there are now 26 states that operate OSHA-approved plans. The 2000 Report explains that while states may not impose standards that are less than the equivalent OSHA rule they may impose more stringent standards. When and if the FAA permits an OSHA requirement to apply to an aircraft cabin and a more stringent state OSHA regulation exists, it is unclear who will evaluate the state rule to determine that it is not in conflict with FAA safety requirements and ensure that compliance is not necessary in such cases.

The 2000 Report notes that these areas require evaluation:

There is a need to determine the effect that state jurisdiction and state plans (pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 667) would have on FAA’s ability to assure aviation safety.
There is a need to determine the effect that state jurisdiction and state plans (pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 667) would have on OSHA’s ability to enforce standards applicable on aircraft that operate in, and over, a number of States.

While this review was submitted in 2000, NATA is concerned that the draft policy explains only that “OSHA is also able to initiate [emphasis added] a process to ensure that airlines will not be subject to multiple different sets of rules as they fly into and out of different states.” Our concern with this statement is two-fold; first, stating that OSHA is “able” to do this as opposed to OSHA “is” creating this process implies that it is not necessarily deemed as a mandatory and essential item, and, second, it seems that OSHA has not yet even begun such a process despite the looming intended application of OSHA rules. These matters need to reach a final resolution prior to any action by the FAA to impose OSHA rules on aircraft cabins.

A second jurisdictional issue relates to how any applicable OSHA standards might apply to international flight operations. Again, the 2000 Report noted this item; the draft policy statement does not address it. Given the significant number of international flight operations conducted, it is imperative to resolve such issues prior to the imposition of the new requirements.

Rulemaking Issues

The FAA properly asserted its authority over the aircraft cabin environment in 1975, and OSHA promulgated every subsequent rule with an understanding that it did not apply to aircraft cabins. While the draft statement is presented as policy-based, it is de facto rulemaking. It is dangerous and disconcerting for the FAA and OSHA to presume to impose regulations in such a way as to avert every legal requirement imposed on rulemaking. The FAA must evaluate and determine that new standards are necessary in accordance with required rulemaking procedures. Any change to the long-standing policy of the FAA that they are solely empowered to create and enforce regulations regarding aircraft operation will result in operational and financial impacts to each operator that the formal rulemaking must address.

The 2000 Report noted these concerns:

There is a need to determine whether it would be necessary for the respective agencies to engage in notice and comment rulemaking prior to applying the enumerated OSHA standards or regulations to employees on aircraft in operation, and, if so, the manner in which to most expeditiously promulgate standards that are applicable to aircraft in operation.
There is a need to determine the manner in which OSHA and FAA would cooperate to assure that standards applicable to employees on aircraft in operation (other than flight deck crew), which may be promulgated at a future date, would not be written or enforced in a manner that could compromise the safe operation of an aircraft.

Should the FAA follow the path articulated in the draft policy statement, a population of affected entities will hereafter have regulatory compliance responsibilities that do not presently exist. A proper rulemaking including a review of the need for these new regulations, a cost/benefit evaluation, and regulatory flexibility determination (to include a small business impact assessment) and notice and comment opportunities for the affected aircraft operators is required.

The FAA did not provide the parties that are now subject to imminent regulatory obligations any opportunity to offer constructive comments on these otherwise required analyses or to recommend revisions to the regulations. Yet it is unclear from the draft policy whether any formal rulemaking processes are planned.

Because, with respect to the aircraft cabin environment, the OSHA regulations were developed absent compliance with the rules governing creation of new regulations, NATA expects that the FAA and/or OSHA will fully meet those rulemaking obligations prior to the application of new or existing regulations on our members and the aviation industry at large.

In addition to the overall need for rulemaking, NATA has identified a specific shortcoming that necessitates rulemaking: defining “aircraft cabin crewmember.” The aviation industry has many positions other than “flight attendant” that may work in an aircraft cabin. These include cargo handlers, medical personnel, supernumeraries, and, in the case of certain aircraft, evacuation crewmembers (as required by the FAA aircraft Type Certificate Data Sheet). While the FAA defines “crewmember” in Part 1 of its regulations, the agency does not define the term “Aircraft Cabin Crewmember.” This term requires formal regulatory definition to determine applicability of any proposed policy or regulations thereof.

Inspection and Enforcement

NATA is also troubled by the limited information on enforcement inspections. That the entirety of the discussion regarding inspection and enforcement consumes only one sentences is concerning. The draft policy states, “OSHA anticipates that it will respond to and investigate complaints or referrals without a need for any inspection of aircraft in operation.” This statement does not preclude OSHA (or a state-based OSHA entity) from conducting inspections of aircraft in operation, it merely conveys that it is not anticipated at this time. The policy is silent on the power imparted to OSHA inspectors to delay an aircraft departure or “ground” an aircraft during the course of their investigations. Good governance practices require establishment of such standards and informing regulated parties as to the rights, roles and responsibilities of all parties. NATA asks that the FAA provide specific detail on what powers and rights it intends OSHA inspectors to have with regard to boarding and/or restricting the movement of aircraft.

What Applies and When

The draft statement enumerates three areas where the FAA will allow application of existing OSHA regulations. Within the draft policy, the FAA states that with regard to hazard communications and bloodborne pathogen rules “OSHA can enforce those standards” and that “OSHA's hearing conservation standard can apply.”

These statements appear to give immediate authority to require compliance with the applicable OSHA regulations upon issuance of this policy as a final document. No compliance timetable or transitional period is noted. The FAA goes explains that “[i]n a subsequent MOU, FAA and OSHA will establish procedures to identify any additional working conditions where OSHA requirements may apply.” This further reinforces construing the statements related to hazard communications, bloodborne pathogens and hearing conservation to intend that they are effective immediately upon issuance of a final policy statement. NATA strongly objects to this course of action. As previously stated, our position is that the proposed actions constitute rulemaking and proper notice and comment is required.

Difficulties complying with existing hearing conservation requirements offer a practical example of why rulemaking is necessary. The ability of an operator to determine interior noise levels of different aircraft in its fleet is highly problematic. The interior cabin noise of an aircraft is based on numerous factors, which include but are not limited to: altitude, pressure, temperature, phase of flight, passenger load, and aircraft systems operation. In addition, adoption of the current OSHA noise standard will require noise testing of each aircraft in the operator’s fleet (since some identical aircraft types may exhibit different cabin noise levels), ongoing monitoring of those noise levels, and yearly audiometric testing of all persons determined to fall within the definition of aircraft cabin crewmembers. This will create a significant expense to operators, and such expense can only be captured and evaluated within the formal rulemaking process.

Negative Safety Consequence

In pursuing this course of action, the FAA has not fully considered the negative safety consequence for operations where a flight attendant is not required. The proposed policy appears directed specifically at Part 121 scheduled airline operations, but it is never stated as such. The commercial on-demand and noncommercial operators do not appear exempt from the requirements of the draft policy.

The vast majority of aircraft operated by on-demand air charter operators and noncommercial aircraft owners do not require the presence of a flight attendant. FAA regulations require a flight attendant only when 20 or more passenger seats are present for on-demand Part 135 operations and for fractional program operations and traditional private operations conducted under Part 91 (see §§ 91.533, 135.107). For a multitude of reasons, many operators and customers elect to place a “cabin attendant” in the aircraft. These persons are known by a variety of names (e.g. cabin attendant, cabin service agent, cabin safety agent), and they serve myriad roles, including safety briefings, food and beverage service, passenger comfort roles and interfacing between the flight crew and the passengers. In some cases, they may be treated by regulation as crewmembers (but not flight attendants as there is no regulatory requirement) or may be treated as an additional passenger. This designation is solely at the discretion of the operator. Their presence on the aircraft is purely voluntary but they serve a valuable safety-enhancing role.

Given the expected burden of compliance (both in costs and administratively) with an entirely new regime of regulations imposed by another government agency, it is highly likely that the continued use of non-required cabin attendants will undergo a critical review to determine the feasibility of continuing to staff the aircraft cabin in this manner. We expect that in many instances the aircraft owner or operator will elect to forgo non-required cabin attendants should the FAA proceed down its current path. NATA requests that the FAA more fully examine and respond to this negative safety consequence. NATA strongly believes that any creation of FAA policy related to the applicability of OSHA standards should, therefore, apply only to operations where the FAA requires flight attendants by regulation.

NATA appreciates the FAA’s willingness to receive comments on this complex issue and looks forward to the agency’s response.

Sincerely,
Jacqueline E. Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs

[1] Such noncommercial activities include, but are not limited to, Part 91 corporate flight operators and Part 91K fractional program operations.

[2] FAA/OSHA Aviation Safety and Health Team (First Report), Application of OSHA’s Requirements to Employees on Aircraft in Operation, December 2000.

Click here for more information.

NATA Offers Online Training for Flight Coordinators

Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:44:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA OFFERS ONLINE TRAINING FOR FLIGHT COORDINATORS

Alexandria, VA, January 23, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce the addition of Aircraft Flight Coordinator Training (AFCT) to its comprehensive online training programs.

The AFCT is a certificate program that provides core flight coordinator knowledge with an emphasis on safety and technical expertise to assist crews with in-depth flight planning.

"The AFCT program sets a new standard in training for schedulers, dispatchers and all of those within organizations that participate in flight planning and release processes," stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. "AFCT is designed to make your flight coordinator an invaluable part of the flight planning team - before, during and after every flight."

The Aircraft Flight Coordinator Training program covers the following topics in six detailed modules:

Introduction and flight coordinator overview
Operating in the national airspace
Regulations and requirements including Ops Specs and Parts 91, 91K and 135
Weather reports and charts
Airports, runways and performance
Flight coordinator resource management

"The most crucial aspects of the AFCT are its emphasis on safety and the in-depth technical expertise," added NATA Vice President, Operations Amy B. Koranda. "As with all of the NATA training programs, the association subjects each module to a rigorous review by panels of industry leaders and experts in the field. NATA is confident that the AFCT will make new and seasoned flight coordinators alike proficient with the latest information and procedures."

NATA will provide demos of the AFCT starting today and running through January 24 at the NBAA Schedulers & Dispatchers Conference in San Antonio, Texas. More information on this invaluable training can be found by clicking here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Applauds Selection of Rep. LoBiondo as Chairman of Aviation Subcommittee

Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:50:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA APPLAUDS SELECTION OF REP. LOBIONDO AS CHAIRMAN OF AVIATION SUBCOMMITTEE

Alexandria, VA, January 16, 2013 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) applauds the selection of Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ) to serve as the new Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure's Aviation Subcommittee for the 113th Congress.

"Chairman LoBiondo understands the vital role of general aviation to the Nation's economy," stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. "Congressman LoBiondo is a capable and knowledgeable leader whose bipartisan work reflects the best interests of the general aviation community."

The FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, one of the Nation's premier aviation research, development, test and evaluation facilities, is located in LoBiondo's district. This clearly provides a very insightful perspective into key developments that are driving the transformation of our national airspace system.

"NATA is confident that Representative LoBiondo's distinguished service in Congress as well as his background as a successful small businessman will be valuable assets in addressing the interests of the general aviation business community," added Hendricks.

NATA members include fixed base operators, air charter operators, flight training providers, and maintenance and repair facilities, which provide thousands of jobs across the country and contribute $150 billion annually to the Nation's economy.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Adds Line Service Supervisor Training To Its Online Offerings

Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:18:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA ADDS LINE SERVICE SUPERVISOR TRAINING TO ITS ONLINE OFFERINGS

Alexandria, VA, January 9, 2013–The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is proud to announce the release of the NATA Safety 1st Line Service Supervision & Training Management Online (Supervisor Online) program.

The Supervisor Online program provides the training fixed base operators' (FBO) line supervisors and managers need to become more proficient in lesson planning, supervising staff, motivating others, communicating and coaching a team. Additional modules will cover many other topics, including fuel servicing, personal protective equipment, hazard communication, and fire safety.

"NATA members asked for online supervisor training, and we are pleased to be able to respond quickly to this need by combining our extensive line service training expertise with our industry-recognized online training platform," said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. "The training of our members in safety and efficiency is always a priority for NATA and will continue to take precedence with this and other new initiatives to be announced in the coming weeks."

Once the online course is completed, it will fulfill the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) 139.321 supervisory requirements. The employee's certificates will meet both the 14 CFR Part 139 Section 321 (e)1 supervisor fire safety training requirements and the Line Service Supervisor Training requirements. In addition to the online course curriculum, participants are provided with line service supervisor training guides containing training resources, lesson plans and trainer guidance to help support internal training programs after certification.

"We recognize that traveling budgets are limited and employee scheduling is tight for many of our members," stated NATA Vice President Amy B. Koranda. "Our Supervisor Online program opens our comprehensive training to an even broader audience than we have been able to reach in the past. At the same time, NATA is remaining supportive of the immense value of face-to-face interactions in networking, idea exchange and sharing of best practices by continuing to offer its popular seminar series."

NATA Safety 1st will hold its Line Service Supervisor Training (LSST) March 11-12, 2013, at the Las Vegas Hotel during the NATA Spring Training seminar series. The LSST is an informative in-person seminar that also fulfills the FAA 139.321 supervisor requirements. This high-impact, high-energy seminar includes guided group debates, interactive discussions and various case studies designed to take FBO supervisors and managers to a new level of leadership. For more information about NATA Spring Training, please click here.

For more information, including pricing, on the NATA Safety 1st Line Service Supervision & Training Management Online, please click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

Click here for more information.

NATA Congratulates Senate on the Confirmation of Huerta as FAA Administrator

Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:04:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA CONGRATULATES SENATE ON THE CONFIRMATION OF MICHAEL HUERTA AS FAA ADMINISTRATOR

Alexandria, VA, January 2, 2013– The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) congratulates the action by the U.S. Senate on the confirmation of Michael P. Huerta as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for a five-year term.

Huerta is an experienced and talented transportation official who has a reputation for managing complex transportation challenges. As the designated federal official of the NextGen Advisory Committee, his leadership has been instrumental in helping drive the increasingly effective activities of this key policy group. His leadership abilities previously led him to the international stage where he was a managing director of the 2002 Olympic Winter Games.

"NATA applauds the U.S. Senate's leadership in confirming Michael Huerta as FAA Administrator," stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. "We look forward to continuing to work with Administrator Huerta on aviation initiatives."

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATF Announces Richard L. Taylor Flight Training Scholarship

Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:15:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATF ANNOUNCES RICHARD L. TAYLOR FLIGHT TRAINING SCHOLARSHIP

Alexandria, VA – December 4, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Foundation (NATF) is pleased to announce the Richard L. Taylor Flight Training Scholarship, the newest addition to the foundation's scholarship program. This scholarship is offered to a college or university student continuing his or her education in the aviation industry.

The scholarship is named after Richard L. Taylor, Professor Emeritus, who for 22 years was the director of flight operations and education at The Ohio State University. Professor Taylor is the award-winning author of 14 books on aviation, including Instrument Flying, IFR for VFR Pilots and Understanding Flying. Professor Taylor's vision, insight and drive helped expand flight education and training at Ohio State. His distinctive leadership fostered extensive opportunities for aviation students to further their careers as professional pilots.

The scholarship applicant must be enrolled in an accredited college or university and have aspirations to become a pilot in either general or commercial aviation.

The applicant must submit along with the completed application a copy of his or her current private pilot's license, an original certified high school transcript showing rank in graduating class if applying as an incoming freshman, and an essay about aviation, his or her goals and dreams and why he or she should receive this scholarship.

The National Air Transportation Foundation is dedicated to promoting general aviation careers through the many scholarships offered. The NATF annually recognizes aviation enthusiasts and encourages development in the general aviation industry. For more information about this scholarship or any of our other scholarship opportunities, please visit our website.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

Click here for more information.

NATA Strongly Urges the Confirmation of Huerta as FAA Administrator

Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:44:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA STRONGLY URGES THE CONFIRMATION OF HUERTA AS FAA ADMINISTRATOR

Alexandria, VA, November 30, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) urges the U.S. Senate to confirm Michael P. Huerta as administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Huerta has been the acting administrator of the FAA since he assumed this role in December 2011.

“As our country prepares to undertake a massive evolution of our National Airspace System, the Federal Aviation Administration needs strong and stable leadership that has been demonstrated by Michael Huerta since he took over the agency’s helm last year,” stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “Huerta’s leadership of several key Next Generation Air Traffic System initiatives and his extensive knowledge of the aviation issues confronting us today are assets that will serve the aviation community well as the agency moves the system forward safely and efficiently.”

“Huerta has also shown leadership by engaging very effectively across all facets of aviation as evidenced by his recent participation in industry events such as NATA’s Aviation Business Roundtable,” added Hendricks.

“Confirming Michael Huerta as FAA administrator is an easy and exceedingly necessary decision in this time of important transition,” concluded Hendricks.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Air Carrier Contract Maintenance Requirements

Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:17:00 GMT

Regulatory Report

AIR CARRIER CONTRACT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

November 19, 2012

What’s at Issue
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), Air Carrier Contract Maintenance, to require Part 135 operators with aircraft that are certificated for 10 or more passenger seats to revise their maintenance program when utilizing contracted maintenance providers.

Why It’s Important
The revised regulations will require affected Part 135 operators to develop and implement FAA-approved policies, procedures, methods and instructions for performing contract maintenance. Operators will also need to ensure that the FAA is provided an up-to-date comprehensive list of all persons with whom they contract their maintenance and what work those facilities provide.

Major Provisions
The NPRM is in response to a congressional mandate to impose new rules for outsourced maintenance on Part 121 air carriers, but the FAA is electing to include Part 135 operators with aircraft having 10 or more passenger seats as well.

The FAA is proposing to create § 135.426, which will specifically address requirements for contract maintenance. Proposed § 135.426 includes definitions for maintenance provider, covered work, directly in charge, and supervision and control. These terms are used to define what functions are covered by the new requirements and the specific oversight responsibilities of the air carrier. The certificate holder must establish policies and procedures to ensure that the maintenance performed by a contract maintenance provider is in accordance with the operator’s maintenance program and maintenance manual.

Operators must also provide a list that includes the name and address of each maintenance provider, as well as a description of the work that will be performed. This list must be in a format acceptable to the FAA and carriers are required to update the list no later than the last day of each calendar month.

NATA Position
NATA is reviewing the NPRM and will develop comments in coordination with the NATA Air Charter and Aircraft Maintenance & Systems Technology committees.

Status
The NPRM was published on November 13, 2012. Comments will be accepted until February 11, 2013. Click

here to download the NPRM, which includes instructions for submitting comments.

Staff Contact: Collin Smith
Manager, Regulatory Affairs
csmith@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

FAA Issues Final Rule Allowing Pilots to Update Naviational Databases

Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:17:00 GMT

Regulatory Report

FAA ISSUES FINAL RULE ALLOWING PILOTS TO UPDATE NAVIGATIONAL DATABASES

November 29, 2012

What’s at Issue
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published a Final Rule, Pilot Loading of Aeronautical Database Updates, allowing pilots to perform certain database updates.

Why It’s Important
This final rule amends the regulations to allow all pilots, including those in air carrier operations, to perform updates to databases of aircraft avionics under certain conditions. Current regulations only allow pilots of aircraft operating under Part 91 to perform these updates. In air carrier environments, authorized maintenance personnel were required to perform these updates.

Major Provisions
The final rule requires that pilot-performed database uploads must be:

Initiated from the flight deck
Performed without disassembling the avionics unit
Performed without the use of tools or specialized equipment

The final rule also requires certificate holders to ensure that written procedures consistent with the manufacturer’s instructions are available to the pilot. These procedures instruct the pilot on how to perform the database update and to determine the status of the upload.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased with this final rule, and is appreciative of the FAA’s efforts to modernize regulations to reflect advances in technology. All of the suggestions proposed in NATA’s comments to the original proposal have been addressed by the agency. NATA encourages all Part 135 operators to review the rule to determine applicability to their operations.

Status
This Final Rule will become effective on January 28, 2013.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments on Repair Stations NPRM

Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:03:00 GMT

November 19, 2012

Docket Operations
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Submitted electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: DOCKET #FAA-2006-26408 - NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING, REPAIR STATIONS

NATA’s membership consists of a significant number of repair stations certificated under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Part 145 (hereafter referred to as repair stations) and an even greater number of aviation businesses that rely on the services provided by repair stations. These repair stations play a vital role in all segments of the aviation industry and contribute greatly to the overall positive impact that aviation has on our nation, economy and lives. It is for these reasons that NATA is pleased to offer these comments.

I. Rule Background and Summary

The Repair Stations NPRM is the culmination of a series of rulemaking projects, proposals and advisory committees that began in 1989. The most recent prior proposal was issued in 2006 and was withdrawn after public comment because it "did not adequately address the current repair station operating environment."

In the withdrawal notice, the FAA commented that further rulemaking had begun that would more "fully address the significant changes in the repair station business model[s]. This proposal is the result of that effort.

Click here to read the full document.

Click here for more information.

O'Keefe and Key Government Officials Featured at NATA Aviation Business Roundtable

Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:52:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

O’KEEFE AND KEY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FEATURED AT NATA AVIATION BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE

Alexandria, VA – November 14, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA) annual Aviation Business Roundtable once again brought key executives in the industry together with some of the most influential decision makers in Washington, D.C. The two-day event (November 12-13) consisted of high-level meetings to discuss critical financial and political issues affecting the aviation business community.

Highlights from the 2012 Aviation Business Roundtable included a:

Luncheon with an opening speech by EADS North America Chairman of the Board and CEO Sean O’Keefe.
General Aviation panel discussion with Ed Bolen, President and CEO, National Business Aviation Association, Pete Bunce, President and CEO, General Aircraft Manufacturers Association, Craig Fuller, President and CEO, Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association, and Chuck Suma, Senior Vice President, Global Asset Management, NetJets, Inc.
2012 election analysis with Rob Chamberlin, Executive Vice President and Business Development Director, McBee Strategic, and Sam Whitehorn, Executive Vice President and Recruiting & Hiring Director, McBee Strategic.
Reception and dinner featuring legendary athlete and aviation business owner Bruce Jenner.
Transportation Security Administration roundtable with The Honorable John S. Pistole, Administrator.
National Transportation Safety Board roundtable with The Honorable Deborah A.P. Hersman, Chairman, and The Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, Member.
Federal Aviation Administration roundtable with The Honorable Michael P. Huerta, Acting Administrator.

“This time each year, NATA assembles panels and presenters to help us understand the most important issues that our industry faces,” stated NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks. “From leaders on Capitol Hill to experts within our own industry, this year’s Roundtable provided a robust platform for our members to learn the latest economic, political, security and legislative issues that will affect their businesses in 2013 and beyond."

Please click here to view the 2012 Aviation Business Roundtable program.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

Click here for more information.

NATA Announces Two Key Staff Changes

Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:57:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Shannon Chambers
Director, Marketing & Communications
800-808-6282
schambers@nata.aero

NATA ANNOUNCES TWO KEY STAFF CHANGES

Alexandria, VA – November 13, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce two key staff changes.

Jim Coon, currently chief of staff for the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, will join NATA as executive vice president in January. Coon has nearly three decades of experience on Capitol Hill as well as significant private sector experience in the aviation industry where he served as director of government affairs for The Boeing Company and for the Air Transport Association (now Airlines for America).

Prior to his appointment as chief of staff to the committee, Coon served as the majority staff director on the Aviation Subcommittee. He served on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee under the chairmanships of Reps. Bud Shuster (R-PA), Don Young (R-AK), Jim Oberstar (D-MN), and John Mica (R-FL), and started his Hill career in 1983 as a legislative aide to former Rep. Bob Smith (R-OR), and then as legislative director for Rep. John J. Duncan, Jr. (R-TN). He also served twelve years as an infantry officer in the National Guard and Army Reserves.

During his tenure as chief of staff, Coon led the committee’s negotiations on important congressional initiatives such as major infrastructure bills for aviation, surface transportation, water, and pipeline transportation. His leadership and negotiating skills earned him the respect of Members in both the House and the U. S. Senate, on both sides of the aisle, and their key aides and advisors.

“Jim Coon is one of the most highly regarded congressional staff members in Washington today,” said NATA President and CEO Tom Hendricks. “His ability to shape complex legislative issues and respectfully work across party lines for the good of the traveling public will rapidly propel NATA to a leading position within the Washington policy establishment. We’re thrilled to welcome Jim to our senior leadership team.”

Coon will lead NATA’s policy, strategy and advocacy efforts. “NATA’s role as the voice of aviation businesses has never been more critical,” said Coon. “NATA members help create thousands of jobs and provide much-needed transportation service for businesses and underserved communities. Helping create policies that protect this vital sector of the economy is NATA’s core mission, and I’m very pleased to be joining this experienced team.

NATA is also pleased to announce the promotion of Amy B. Koranda to vice president. Koranda will add several major association programs to her current responsibilities as head of NATA’s highly regarded Safety 1st Program. Said Hendricks, "Amy’s vast aviation experience, business acumen and leadership will provide our members and organization a level of service and expertise unparalleled within Washington trade associations."

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

To opt out of receiving emails from this list, please reply to this email with the subject "unsubscribe".

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments on FAA Portable Electronic Device Policy

Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:32:00 GMT

October 30, 2012

Docket Operations, M-30

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12-140

West Building Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Delivered electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket No. FAA-2012-0752; Passenger Use of Portable Electronic Devices on Board Aircraft

Key Recommendations

As the national association representing Part 135 air carriers and Part 91 fractional aircraft program managers, NATA supports increased access to personal electronic devices (PEDs) by passengers. NATA offers two key recommendations with regard to passenger use of PEDs while on board aircraft.

1. NATA recommends that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) permit the use of PEDs at any time while on board an aircraft under the following conditions;

authorization of PED use is, in general, at the discretion of the carrier or program manager, and, for any given operation, at the discretion of the flight crew
devices may not be in use during the departure briefing (but may remain powered-on)
larger devices (e.g. laptop computers) should be stowed for takeoff and landing phases per operator-established policies or at the direction of the flight crew

2. With regard to transmitting PEDs (such as mobile phones or other devices using cellular technology), NATA recommends that FAA policy and regulations should permit the use of said devices if the carrier so chooses to permit, and equip the aircraft as necessary to support, such use.

Differences In Passenger Attitudes

NATA believes it is critical for the FAA to understand the different perspectives on PEDs amongst passengers of on-demand air charter and/or fractional program aircraft and those on the Part 121 airlines. The concerns expressed by many airline passengers related to PEDs, and in particular concerns over mobile phone usage, are largely due to the cramped environment typical on an airline aircraft. Passengers fear disruptions and annoyances caused by cell phones being used in this environment.

On the contrary, the passengers on aircraft utilized by NATA’s members would welcome the ability to use their cell phones during their flight. These passengers want to be accessible to their business associates or family during their trip. Flights are generally limited to select persons all known to each other and who are traveling for a common purpose – i.e. a business meeting. These persons are able to decide for themselves, collectively, whether any conversation is inappropriate or disruptive to the group.

Passengers on our member’s aircraft are actively inquiring about the ability to use their own phone during flight rather than rely on installed flight phones that are not easily used to receive inbound communications.

We recognize and respect that this view is not shared by many operating within the Part 121 environment and recommend that due to the distinct operational environments and passenger feedback, it is appropriate to consider Part 135 and Part 91 operations separately in this matter. Our members operating and managing aircraft and the passengers that use these aircraft are in agreement in their desire to enhance PED use, including cellular-based PEDs, on board aircraft.

Passenger Safety Briefing

The importance of a proper pre-departure briefing is critical and NATA supports PED-related regulations mandating that these devices may not be “in use” during the briefing. This is distinguished from current policies that require devices to be shut down or turned off prior to flight. NATA does not imply that a passenger would need to turn off a device merely that it is not to be in use during the safety briefing. Put simply, passengers should not be listening to music or talking on the phone during a briefing, much like they are asked to stop reading the paper or to cease conversations with seatmates today.

Interference

The FAA explains in its notice that rules restricting PEDs originated due to demonstrated interference with aircraft navigation systems resulting from FM radio receivers. To the extent that radio technology was demonstrated to create interference and may still pose an interference threat it is appropriate for the FAA to continue to bar their use on aircraft. Likewise it would be appropriate for the FAA to restrict any devices known to cause interference. However, the majority of devices that today’s passengers wish to use have never, to our knowledge, been shown to create a flight hazard. Despite many studies the FAA cites no conclusive data to show that today’s electronics are a threat.

To the contrary, there is now real-world experience supporting increased ability to used PEDs, including transmitting PEDs like cell phones during all phases of flight. Widespread PED use during flight at altitude has generated no known problems that would indicate use during all phases would be unsafe. Further, several non-U.S. airlines now permit the use of cellular connected devices during flight. These carriers have satisfied their respective regulatory authorities’ safety concerns and installed equipment allowing cell phones and other connected devices to be used during flight. To date, there have been no reports of adverse safety consequences. The FAA now has current, real-world experiences to refer to that support the ability and choice of an aircraft owner or operator to install this equipment. At this juncture, the hesitation to move toward permitting use of cell phones and other connected devices appears to be influenced more by public sentiment than hard data. Again, NATA fully appreciates this concern. It is why we are recommending changes specific to the on-demand air charter and fractional ownership segments of the industry.

Procedures and Methods for Operators to Allow Use of PEDs

As the FAA moves toward an adoption of increased use of PEDs by passengers, there are safety concerns to address. NATA believes that the FAA should shift the regulations (i.e. §§ 91.21 and 135.144) to permit, rather than prohibit, PED use by passengers unless the operator chooses to restrict such use. This shift would grant passengers wider ability to use PEDs, but retains the ability of the operator to restrict use for any reason at any time. This places the focus on carrier or program manager policies in conjunction with the authority of the flight crew, to determine when (and which) devices may not be used.

Current regulations state that the aircraft operator may permit PEDs that the operator has determined will not cause interference with the aircraft (see 14 CFR 135.144(b)(5)). NATA advocates that the FAA amend the regulations to permit the use of PEDs unless carrier-restricted rather than today’s standard where the carrier must specifically approve every device. With the rapid progress of technology and new devices being released daily it is unrealistic to anticipate that every possible device a passenger may bring on board has been determined by the carrier not to cause interference and that each device is addressed in the operator’s manuals and procedures.

A more realistic stance, given the lack of data showing negative interference is an issue today, is to permit most PEDs unless the operator and/or flight crew decide to prohibit items. The FAA, PED manufacturers and others should collaborate to provide to aircraft operators any information on specific devices that may or are known to cause interference.

PED Retention Risks

A concern with allowing the use of larger PEDs during take-off and landing phases of flight is their potential to become projectiles or obstacles during an emergency. NATA concurs with this assessment, and believes that the air carrier/program manager is best suited to determine at what size or weight articles become a concern. On the typical aircraft utilized by our members, the most likely PED to fall into this category is a laptop computer. Due to the substantially lower passenger capacity experienced in this industry it is not as likely these items will become evacuation obstacles as they might in the cramped quarters of airliners. It is possible that they could cause injury as projectiles and should be stowed during critical phases. NATA recommends that the operators are best suited to determine how such items will be handled on a given aircraft.

NATA appreciates the opportunity to provide our views to the FAA as the agency considers changes to existing PED policy.

Sincerely,

Jacqueline E. Rosser

Director, Regulatory Affairs

Click here for more information.

Candidates Need to Focus on General Aviation Benefits

Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:27:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

Candidates Need to Focus on General Aviation Benefits
Contributes $150 billion to U.S. Economy/Employs 1.3 million

Alexandria, VA – October 15, 2012 — In advance of tomorrow night’s second presidential debate, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is encouraging both President Obama and challenger Mitt Romney to focus on the vital role that aviation plays in the U.S. economy.

“The general aviation industry employs 1.3 million people and contributes more than $150 billion to the U.S. economy,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas Hendricks. “It’s important that our leaders recognize the massive job-creating role of general aviation. Aviation is the critical component that connects the U.S. economy and we simply cannot take it for granted or use it for partisan political purposes.”

Hendricks comments follow a statement in the first Presidential debate by President Obama erroneously implying that general aviation received unfair tax breaks.

“Without question, general aviation pays its fair share of taxes, but clearly both candidates need to focus on the more important issue: our significant contribution to the U.S. economy,” continued Hendricks. “When the U.S. economy comes roaring back, general aviation is going to be playing an important role in the front lines.”

“I am hopeful that as both candidates participate in tomorrow night’s town hall debate they will take the opportunity to highlight the invaluable services that the general aviation community provides to the U.S. and global economy now and moving forward,” concluded Hendricks.

# # #

ABOUT NATA: NATA is the voice of aviation business and is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies. NATA represents aviation businesses both large and small, with 30 percent employing twenty employees or less. NATA members provide fuel, pilot training, maintenance and other critical aviation services.

Click here for more information.

NATA Announces New Workers' Compensation Insurance Program to Start January 1, 2013

Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:44:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282

NATA ANNOUNCES NEW WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE PROGRAM TO START JANUARY 1, 2013

Alexandria, VA – September 5, 2012 —The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that starting January 1, 2013, the association will offer its members a new, cutting edge benefit, the NATA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program.

The new NATA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program was designed to benefit members’ businesses and help advance our industry’s safety goals embodied in NATA’s Safety 1st program. The NATA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program is underwritten by Companion Property & Casualty Group and managed by Beacon Aviation Insurance Services, Inc. This exciting new program will offer Beacon’s most competitive prices for NATA members. In addition, NATA’s members participating in NATA’s Safety 1st programs will be given preferential pricing wherever it is permitted by state rules.

The new program was developed not only to reduce member operating costs but also to assist NATA in fostering and expanding its current array of safety programs. To date, NATA’s Safety 1st program supports members through:

on-line training,
the NATA Safety 1st Management System for Ground Operations,
the NATA Safety 1st Management System for Air Operators, and
the NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit Standard.

“We are proud to provide leadership and support for the advancement of aviation safety standards. Our goal is to work with industry to achieve the highest levels of safety possible a and we are excited by the opportunity to broaden that support through NATA’s latest membership benefit program,” said NATA President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks.

To learn more about this new Workers’ Compensation Insurance program, review the ‘NATA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program Frequently Asked Questions’ by clicking here or visit the Beacon Aviation Insurance Services Web site.

NATA recommends that member companies contact their insurance agent prior to the renewal of their current program to find out more about the benefits of this new program through Beacon Aviation Insurance Services.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Epps Addresses Detrimental Impact of User Fees at Congressional Hearing

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:32:00 GMT

EPPS ADDRESSES DETRIMENTAL IMPACT OF USER FEES AT CONGRESSIONAL HEARING

Alexandria, VA – September 12, 2012 — National Air Transportation Association (NATA) Treasurer Marian Epps testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Small Business today on the detrimental impact of user fees. At the hearing titled “User Fees in the Aviation Industry: Turbulence Ahead,” Epps discussed the effects of the slower economy on small businesses supporting the aviation community and the impact the proposed user fee would have on these businesses in a time of recovery.

“In a time when general aviation businesses are looking to spur economic and job growth, the imposition of a user fee would decimate small businesses around the country that depend on general aviation. User fees would also be detrimental to many states with little or no commercial airline service where general aviation plays an integral economic role,” Epps stated.

Epps detailed the critical importance of general aviation businesses to the American economy through their employment of 1.2 million workers and generation of $150 billion annually in economic activity. General aviation and small airports and businesses also provide access to a host of important services and resources, including medical care, law enforcement, disaster relief, mail delivery, fire fighting and flight training.

“User fees would significantly impede general aviation in the United States for a variety of reasons, including a reduction in general aviation activity and the imposition of an onerous administrative burden as user bills are typically generated after the flight,” Epps stated.

Epps said that concerns are high about the ramifications the proposed user fee would have on the aviation industry and the small businesses it represents. The aviation industry believes that the current system of aviation excise taxes is the most stable, efficient and equitable source of funding for the Airport and Airways Trust Fund. The costs associated with user fees far outweigh any benefit to deficit reduction.

Epps concluded by saying that the association looks forward to working with the committee in resolving this important issue and is eager to serve as a valuable resource for aviation businesses during this critical debate.

NATA President Tom Hendricks, commenting on the issue, said, “Not only would any new fees have a lasting negative effect on an industry that contributes significantly to the nation’s exports and world markets, it would also create a federal collection bureaucracy that would require additional funding and manpower, a counterproductive effort.”

To view the testimony, please click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments On FAA Through-the-Fence Policy

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:40:00 GMT

September 14, 2012

Docket Operations

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590

Submitted electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket #FAA-2012-0754, Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Policy Regarding Access to Airports From Residential Property

NATA firmly believes that the strength of our National Airspace System (NAS) arises in part from the flexibility of airports to respond as the economic needs of their community and region grow over time. Many vital reliever and general aviation (GA) airports across the nation developed that flexibility over the past 30 years as the needs of their community changed. NATA’s interest in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) proposed policy stems from the association’s objective of protecting the future utility of our nation’s airports. Airports that have met short-term needs through solutions that hamper future expansion and growth are of a reduced utility to the NAS and our nation.

In general, NATA concurs with the FAA’s reading of Public Law 112-95, Section 136 (section 136) and the Proposed Final Policy on Existing Through-the-Fence Access to Commercial Service Airports From a Residential Property (proposed policy) and offers the comments below on important areas of concurrence and difference.

Existing RTTF Access

NATA concurs with the FAA policy as presented in regards to existing Residential Through The Fence (RTTF) access.

New RTTF Access at Commercial Service Airports

NATA concurs with the FAA’s interpretation that new RTTF access at commercial service airports would constitute a violation of grant assurance 5(g) and is, therefore, prohibited.

Review of Proposed New RTTF Agreements at GA Airports

NATA concurs with the FAA’s interpretation that “the inclusion of specific terms and conditions [in PL 112-95, Section 136, indicates] Congress’ intent for the FAA to enforce the provision accordingly.”[1]

Some may argue that Congress did not intend for prior review of proposed RTTF agreements but rather an after-the-fact review. Such a view, however, is flawed. After-the-fact reviews of signed RTTF agreements present no pathways to compliance since an airport sponsor would already be legally obligated to comply with the terms of the signed agreement. Under those situations, such an agreement and the associated access would likely continue as the airport sponsor would be obligated by the binding agreement.

Congress, during the debate surrounding the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, was well aware of the FAA’s interim policy prohibiting new RTTF agreements; therefore, it must be assumed that the purpose of section 136 was to create a narrow carve-out that allowed new RTTF to occur only under the included restrictions. After-the-fact review of RTTF agreements, as it would likely allow non-compliant access to continue, therefore frustrates Congress’ narrow intent that RTTF access only occur under the specific enumerated restrictions contained in section 136. Prior review of proposed RTTF agreements, therefore, is the only method to ensure that Congress’ intent if fulfilled.

Interpretation of Conditions Contained in Section 136

NATA generally concurs with the FAA’s interpretation of the restrictions contained in section 136. Of particular concern to NATA were the conditions regarding access for a property owner not party to an RTTF agreement through the property of an individual that is party to an RTTF agreement, commercial activities on a property with RTTF access, and aircraft refueling on property subject to an RTTF agreement. NATA believes that the FAA has properly interpreted Congress’ intent in all but one case, detailed below.

The proposed interpretation regarding the requirement that property subject to an RTTF agreement must be “maintain[ed] … for residential, noncommercial use”[2] states that the FAA believes this is a “prohibition on commercial aeronautical services offered by residential through-the-fence users.”[3] While NATA believes this interpretation to be correct, the language of section 136 also prohibits RTTF users from offering their property to the public for the sole purpose of receiving commercial aeronautical services from a third party[4].

Without such an interpretation, a third party could establish a commercial aeronautical service facility off of the airport (and thus free from airport regulation and collection of fees applicable to similar on-airport providers) and perform those services for the public on the property of an RTTF access holder. The language of section 136 prohibits commercial (aeronautical) use of property subject to an RTTF agreement.

NATA requests that the FAA modify its interpretation to indicate that allowing public use of the property to receive commercial aeronautical services would be a violation of the conditions set forth in section 136.

Level of Review

The conditions set forth in section 136 regarding new RTTF access agreements at general aviation airports are novel, and thus their proper application will be vital in the early stages of this policy. Over time as a record is developed of the proper application of these restrictions, evaluations of proposed RTTF access agreements will become more routine. Under the current vision[5] offered by this policy and the associated Compliance Guidance Letter, proposed new RTTF agreements at general aviation airports would be reviewed at the Headquarters level. NATA believes that in the early stages of this policy headquarters level review of proposed new RTTF access agreements is vital to ensure the consistent application of the policy. However, NATA believes over a number of years this review could be moved to the Regional or Airports District Office level. NATA requests that the FAA consider an appropriate time line for such a change.

NATA appreciates the opportunity to provide its comments on this proposed policy.

Sincerely,

Michael France

Director, Regulatory Affairs

[1] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44516

[2] P.L. 112-95, section 136(A) “(t)(2)(B)(iii)

[3] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44517

[4] Checklist item #4 in Appendix D of the draft Compliance Letter provides language that NATA believes meets the full intent of the law; “airport sponsor prohibit[s] commercial aeronautical uses on the property”

[5] Draft Compliance Letter, Section V(a), page 9

Click here for more information.

GA Avgas Coalition Applauds FAA's Creation of Avgas Fuels Program Office

Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:16:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

GA AVGAS COALITION APPLAUDS FAA’S CREATION OF AVGAS FUELS PROGRAM OFFICE

Alexandria, VA, September 13, 2012 — In response to a letter from the industry members of the General Aviation Avgas Coalition urging funding for an unleaded avgas program, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced the formation of a new Fuels Program Office. The office will be responsible for “providing technical expertise and strategic direction in the planning, management, and coordination of activities related to aviation fuels.” This is the next important step in establishing an unleaded avgas transition program that will evaluate the viability of candidate fuels and generate the data needed for fleet- wide aircraft certification and development of a commercial fuel specification.

The letter described the FAA organizational steps already underway, many of which stemmed from the final recommendations made by the Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee (UAT ARC). These included the hiring of a transition consultant to work with industry to establish a Piston Aviation Fuel Initiative steering group.

The general aviation industry members of the General Aviation Avgas Coalition include the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, Experimental Aircraft Association, General Aviation Manufacturers Association, National Air Transportation Association, and National Business Aviation Association. The heads of these associations issued the following statement:

“The FAA’s direct involvement and participation in this process is critical to ensuring a fleet-wide transition to an unleaded avgas that will maintain consumer confidence and ensure the least impact on the existing fleet. The establishment of the new Fuels Program Office will ensure an efficient use of both government and industry resources and will provide a more comprehensive pathway and timeline to an unleaded fuel.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

New NATA Workers' Compensation Insurance Program

Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:23:00 GMT

Dear NATA Member,

I am pleased to announce, as one of my first official duties as NATA president and CEO, a new member program to benefit your business and help advance our industry’s safety goals embodied in NATA’s Safety 1st program. Starting January 1, 2013, the association will offer our members a new cutting edge NATA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program designed exclusively for NATA members with your special needs in mind. The program is underwritten by Companion Property & Casualty Group and managed by Beacon Aviation Insurance Services, Inc. This exciting new program will offer their most competitive prices for NATA members. In addition, NATA’s members participating in NATA’s Safety 1st programs will be given preferential pricing wherever it is permitted by local state rules!

The new program was developed not only to reduce member operating costs but also to assist NATA in fostering and expanding its current array of safety programs. To date, NATA’s Safety 1st program supports members through:

on-line training,
the NATA Safety 1st Management System for Ground Operations,
the NATA Safety 1st Management System for Air Operators, and
the NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit Standard.

We are proud to lead and support the advancement of safety standards that achieve the highest levels of safety in the aviation industry and are excited by the opportunity to broaden that support through NATA’s latest membership benefit program.

To learn more about this exciting new Workers’ Compensation program, I encourage you to review the ‘NATA Workers’ Compensation Insurance Program Frequently Asked Questions’, by clicking here.

Tomorrow, we will send out a Press Release announcing the program. At the same time, Beacon Aviation Insurance Services will publish information about the program on its Web site.

NATA recommends that member companies contact their insurance agent prior to the renewal of their current program to find out more about the benefits of this new program through Beacon Aviation Insurance Services. I look forward to getting to know you and to finding additional ways for NATA to address your business’ needs and concerns.

Sincerely,

Thomas L. Hendricks
President and CEO

Click here for more information.

NATA Presents Its FBO Success Seminar: An MRI For Your FBO

Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:57:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Amy B. Koranda
Directory, Safety and Training
800-808-6282
akoranda@nata.aero

NATA PRESENTS ITS FBO SUCCESS SEMINAR: AN MRI FOR YOUR FBO

Alexandria, VA, August 9, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association's (NATA) acclaimed FBO Success Seminar Series will head to Dallas, Texas, September 12-14 with an emphasis on improving the vital parts of an FBO operation.

This will be the first FBO Success Seminar hosted by an FBO facility - the award-winning Business Jet Center.

"Seeking operational help for an FBO is no different than seeking medical help for an illness," said John Enticknap, president of Aviation Business Strategies Group (ABSG) and facilitator for the seminar. "Sometimes we need a closer look at all the vital parts in order to come up with a remedy that puts us on the path to prosperity. That's why we call it an MRI for Your FBO."

Enticknap explained that the seminar, aimed at FBO owners, operators, managers and financial personnel, utilizes a well-balanced, three-pronged approach to doing vital discovery work.

According to Enticknap, the MRI three-letter acronym stands for the following:
. M = Maximizing Profits
. R = Reducing Expenses
. I = Improving FBO Productivity and Bottom-Line Performance

In addition to the 10 sessions addressing financial and operational productivity, the seminar places an emphasis on networking with other FBOs and learning various best practices through lively roundtable discussions. Business Jet Center will also conduct a tour of their facility, allowing attendees an opportunity to see first-hand the inner workings of this highly successful FBO.

Registration for the FBO Success Seminar is available on NATA's Web site, www.nata.aero/events. The cost for the three-day seminar is $625 for NATA members and $725 for non-members. FBOs registering two or more attendees receive more than a 20% discount, per registrant.

# # #

About Aviation Business Strategies Group
Aviation Business Strategies Group (ABSG) was founded in 2006 by aviation FBO service and marketing veterans John Enticknap and Ron Jackson. Their goal is to help aviation service companies, FBOs in particular, become more profitable by sharing and teaching their proprietary10 Steps to FBO Success. Through a series of seminars, workshops, webinars and personal business coaching, the team at ABSG has helped FBOs solve practical problems and create winning solutions. www.absggroup.com

About National Air Transportation Association
NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies. www.NATA.aero

Click here for more information.

NATF Announces Scholarship Recipient

Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:39:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATF ANNOUNCES SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENT

Alexandria, VA - July 31, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Foundation (NATF) is proud to announce the first winner of its new Navigate Your Future Scholarship.

The 2012 Navigate Your Future Scholarship has been awarded to Sebastian Perez, an upcoming freshman at Broward College in Fort Lauderdale, FL. Sebastian graduated from Western High School carrying a GPA of 4.73. He was president of the Science Honor Society, a senator in the National Honor Society, and a company commander in JROTC. He has over 200 community service hours. Sebastian is planning to complete a Professional Pilot Associate in Science. As he had already completed some of the required credits for this goal while attending high school, Sebastian plans to fill his class schedule with aviation-related electives to become a well-rounded expert in all aviation related fields.

"This first recipient of our newest scholarship is the kind of individual we like to see coming into the aviation industry. Sebastian should do very well with his career, and we are happy to provide assistance to a well deserving candidate," said National Air Transportation Association (NATA) Director of Safety & Training Amy B. Koranda.

The Navigate Your Future Scholarship was established to assist rising professionals in continuing their education in aviation-related fields.

"We announced this scholarship on May 7, 2012, and by the June 29 closing date we were pleased to have received 14 applicants. We applaud the many young aviation enthusiasts among us, and we wish them all the best of luck in navigating their futures to achieve their goals," said NATA Manager of Safety 1^st Programs Elizabeth Nicholson.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Selects New President

Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:00:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Jim Sweeney

Chairman

701-373-8802

jim@fargojet.com

NATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION SELECTS NEW PRESIDENT

Alexandria, VA, July 24, 2012 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) Board of Directors is pleased to announce the selection of Thomas L. Hendricks as the association’s new president. He succeeds James K. Coyne, who has served as NATA’s president since 1994. Hendricks will start his duties on September 1, 2012.

Hendricks most recently served as the senior vice president, safety, security and operations for Airlines for America, where he was responsible for all core airline technical and operational functions. He was also responsible for developing and shaping advocacy and policy positions on flight operations, safety, engineering, air traffic management and security.

“I am pleased to be joining NATA at such a critical time in aviation,” said Hendricks. “Aviation drives our global economy, and I understand well the issues and opportunities we face. I look forward to working with NATA members and other stakeholder groups to continue improving an environment that puts safety first and enables general aviation to play a critical role in delivering service, creating jobs and facilitating commercial growth.”

“We are proud to add Tom Hendricks to our team and to have him lead NATA,” said Jim Sweeney, NATA chairman. “Tom brings a wealth of aviation experience and knowledge to the National Air Transportation Association. His experience and success with driving policy and advocacy programs will bring the visibility that NATA needs to grow and to continue to be a strong influence in the aviation industry.”

“I am pleased that the board has chosen someone of Tom’s caliber to take the reins at NATA. I look forward to working with him as he transitions into his new role,” Coyne said.

Hendricks previously worked with Delta Air Lines as director of line operations and a chief pilot for flight operations in Atlanta, Georgia. During that time, Hendricks represented Delta on several key industry groups. Hendricks has also testified frequently before U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives subcommittees on safety, security and aviation operations.

A retired Air Force Reserve colonel and career fighter pilot, Hendricks served on active duty as a United States Navy officer on the USS Midway (CV-41) and as an instructor pilot at the United States Navy Fighter Weapons School. A native of Fairfield, Ohio, Hendricks graduated from The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina, with a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics with secondary emphasis in Business Administration.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs

Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:55:00 GMT

Regulatory Report

COMBINED DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING PROGRAMS

July 23, 2012

What’s at Issue
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing, that would permit Part 135 operators with a second drug and alcohol testing program for air tour operations to combine those programs.

Why It’s Important
Eliminating duplicate drug and alcohol testing programs would reduce costs and administrative burdens for operators that choose to adopt a single program.

Major Provisions
If the NPRM is approved, Part 135 operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations would have the option of combining the separate drug and alcohol testing programs that are required today into a single program. However, it is important for operators to be aware that the Part 135 operator will be responsible for any violations of the drug and alcohol testing program, regardless of the type of operation in which it incurred. Therefore, violations would be assessed at the Part 135 level, not the Part 91 level, under a combined program.

NATA Position
NATA supports the proposed rule and encourages members that may be eligible to combine programs to review the NPRM and submit comments as appropriate.

Status
The NPRM was published on July 2, 2012. The FAA will accept comments until August 31, 2012. Download a copy of the NPRM, which includes instructions for submitting comments.

Staff Contact: Collin Smith
Manager, Regulatory Affairs
csmith@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments on Petition for Exemption from Federal Aviation Regulation Sections 61.3 and 61.23

Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:29:00 GMT

July 2, 2012

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E., West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-40

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket #FAA-2012-0350, Petition for Exemption from Federal Aviation Regulation Sections 61.3 and 61.23

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA's over 2,000 member companies own, operate and service aircraft and provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation and the military.

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) have joined together in petitioning for an exemption from Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61 sections 3(c), 23(a)(3) (FAA Docket # FAA-2012-350-). The petition seeks to allow members of both associations to fly recreationally without a third-class medical certificate. Those who chose not to have a medical certificate could continue to fly by assessing their own physical condition prior to each flight after having completed an in-depth course on aeromedical factors and flight physiology. The free course would be offered online, but must be retaken every two years. However, restrictions for those without a medical certificate would include operations in a single-engine aircraft with less than 180 hp operating in day VFR conditions.

NATA supports the AOPA / EAA petition. By providing the option for pilots to medically self-assess themselves, NATA believes that the aviation community could thrive without compromising safety.

Safety

NATA believes the proposed exemption would not adversely affect safety and could actually serve as a safety benefit.

Sport pilot regulations do not require pilots to obtain a medical certificate but, rather, places the responsibility on the pilot for judging his or her level of fitness to fly. Since the creation of these regulations, the level of safety regarding medically related issues has remained constant for those operations that do require an FAA medical certificate. Therefore, expanding the privileges of aircraft operations without a medical certificate would be of no detriment to the aviation industry.

NATA believes that providing pilots with an in-depth aero medical education would not compromise the integrity of safety within the general aviation community. While an FAA medical examination is a one-time exam, pilots would be able to assess their own physical condition more thoroughly prior to every flight. The education provided to pilots would allow them to take a more preventative stance, recognizing early symptoms before the onset of a serious problem.

Promotion of Aviation

Granting this petition would alleviate much of the burden pilots face when obtaining an FAA medical certificate. Between the time and expenses it takes to obtain the medical certificate, the burden for many pilots is just too much to continue flying. Allowing properly educated pilots to medically assess themselves would not only incentivize pilots to keep flying, but would also attract many future pilots to aviation. The petition serves the public interest by helping to maintain a strong aviation community.

Conclusion

NATA supports the petition as a benefit to safety and the public. The use of an in-depth aero medical education program would enable pilots to better assess their own physical conditions prior to every flight. There is no doubt that those who will benefit the most from this exemption will be both current and future pilots as well as the airports in the communities that rely on general aviation .

Collin Smith

Manager, Regulatory Affairs

Click here for more information.

Stakeholder Committee Recommends Collaborative Industry-Government Initiative to Facilitate Unleaded Avgas Transition

Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:50:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS COLLABORATIVE INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE TO FACILITATE UNLEADED AVGAS TRANSITION

Alexandria, VA – June 27, 2012 — Today, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published the final report and recommendations from the Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee (UAT ARC), a collaborative industry-government task force of key stakeholders representing aircraft and engine manufacturers, fuel producers and distributors, operator groups, aviation associations, the FAA and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This group studied the challenges associated with the transition to an unleaded fuel to replace 100LL and made recommendations necessary to facilitate the development and deployment of an unleaded fuel with the least impact on the existing piston-engine aircraft fleet. The transition may still be years away, but this report charts a roadmap that identifies the essential elements that need to be addressed to make this happen in a way that maintains safety and the role government should play in minimizing the total cost.

The UAT ARC found that a “drop-in” unleaded replacement fuel that can be seamlessly deployed for the existing fleet of aircraft is not available and that alternative fuels require significant assessment to ensure safety. In addition, to date there is not a market-driven reason to move to a replacement fuel due to the limited size and specialty nature of avgas, combined with the safety, liability and expense involved with a complex approval and deployment process. After its own review, the FAA “found the information and recommendations contained in the report to be very helpful in understanding the challenges of transitioning the piston engine-powered fleet to an unleaded avgas.”

The UAT ARC provided several recommendations and detailed action plans necessary to facilitate the development and fleet-wide deployment of an unleaded avgas. The key recommendations include:

Implementation of a “Fuel Development Roadmap” that identifies specific milestones in the avgas development process and information needed to support assessment of the viability of candidate fuels in terms of impact on aircraft and production infrastructure and economic considerations.
Centralized testing of candidate unleaded fuels at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center funded by government and industry in-kind contributions to generate qualification and certification data.
Establishment of a collaborative industry-government initiative, referred to as the Piston Aviation Fuels Initiative (PAFI), to coordinate implementation of the UAT ARC recommendations to develop and deploy an unleaded avgas with the least impact on the existing piston-engine aircraft fleet.

If recommendations are fully implemented and funded, up to 10 unleaded aviation gasoline candidates could be evaluated. Within five years, the process would generate qualification and certification data to support fleet-wide certification of the most promising candidates. The actual transition to an unleaded avgas depends directly upon the level of impact upon the existing fleet and fuel production infrastructure. Therefore, the UAT ARC recommendation includes up to six years for additional assessment and testing that may be necessary to facilitate a transition such as implementing approvals across the entire fleet, certification of modifications and changes to fuel production infrastructure.

The PAFI would rely on technical expertise from all stakeholders within industry and government. Centralized FAA testing of candidate fuels is essential to support an efficient fleet-wide qualification and certification, which is necessary for safety. Although this is just one part early in the process, this investment by the FAA will minimize the total cost of transition for both the FAA and industry. It also helps overcome significant market barriers, which will facilitate industry investments needed toward the development of unleaded avgas and transition of the entire fleet of aircraft.

This is a joint statement from the general aviation industry members of the Avgas Coalition, which includes the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, the Experimental Aircraft Association, the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, the National Air Transportation Association, and the National Business Aviation Association. This group applauds the FAA’s leadership in establishing and participating in the UAT ARC and believes the recommendations are critically important to facilitating a transition to an unleaded avgas that works for the entire fleet. It will give owners and operators added confidence that the industry is on the right path to a solution.

The general aviation associations will continue to work with the FAA in developing, implementing and funding an unleaded avgas plan that includes the key elements outlined in the ARC’s report that are necessary to facilitate the development and deployment of an unleaded avgas with least impact upon the existing piston-engine aircraft fleet.

The full FAA UAT-ARC report, including specific recommendations and detailed action plans, is available from the FAA Web site.

Contacts:

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)
     Benét Wilson | 301-695-2159 | Benet.wilson@aopa.org

Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA)
      Dick Knapinski | 920-426-6523 | dknapinski@eaa.org

General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA)
     Jens Hennig | 202-393-1500 | jhennig@gama.aero

National Air Transportation Association (NATA)
     Mike France | 703-845-9000 | mfrance@nata.aero

National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)
     Dan Hubbard | 202-783-9360 | dhubbard@nbaa.org

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA and Conklin & de Decker to Hold Popular Tax Seminar

Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:30:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA AND CONKLIN & DE DECKER TO HOLD POPULAR TAX SEMINAR

Alexandria, VA - June 22, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) and Conklin & de Decker Associates, Inc are pleased to announce that they will partner once again to offer the Commercial Operators Tax Seminar. This year's Tax Seminar will be held in Scottsdale, Arizona, August 7-8, 2012.

Unique from other tax seminars and workshops, the NATA and Conklin & de Decker tax seminar is the only seminar that is designed for the commercial operator and focuses on the current tax issues affecting aircraft charter and management companies.

Charter operators contend with a convoluted maze of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), as well as federal, state and local tax issues. Adding to the confusion is the additional tax complexity of Part 135 charter flying versus Part 91 owner flying. Who needs to pay tax on what charges and to whom are the taxes owed? How often are they paid and who collects? These are all questions for which simple answers are hard to find, so NATA and Conklin & de Decker put together this two-day seminar to cover it all.

In addition, this seminar will look at the recent IRS Chief Counsel Advisory relating to the application of the commercial federal excise taxes to owner flights and management fees, and the operational control regulation (A008) and its impact on operators and owners.

"Because the commercial operators tax seminar was designed with on-demand air charter operators in mind, it delivers the specific, timely information needed by the industry in a format that encourages interaction and discussion," commented NATA Director of Regulatory Affairs Jacqueline Rosser.

Expert instructors deliver the information and tools necessary to enable aircraft operators to determine where taxes and fees apply and how to manage best tax compliance and the impact on company cash flow.

This seminar is a must-attend for all commercial aircraft operators and management companies, whether they serve as the director of operations, CFO or controller. Owners and operators that have an aircraft on a Part 135 certificate or that are considering doing so will find this seminar beneficial to the future of their operation.

The seminar's price is $995; however, if you register before July 7, 2012, the Early Bird price is $895. For more information about this seminar visit the NATA Web site at www.nata.aero/taxseminar or contact Christine Preston at 928-443-8676 or Christine@conklindd.com, or visit the Conklin & de Decker Web site at www.conklindd.com.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Letter to Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam in Opposition of Government Competition with Private Business

Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:59:00 GMT

June 19, 2012

The Honorable Bill Haslam

State Capitol Building

Nashville, TN 37243-0001

Dear Governor Haslam:

I am writing to bring to your attention a national issue affecting our transportation infrastructure that has, in recent months, become centered in the state of Tennessee. This issue concerns airport owners, which are usually arms of state and local government, creating an unlevel playing field for the private companies that do business at their airport. This issue is highlighted by the actions of the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Authority (CMAA), which has utilized more than $10 million in government grants to establish its own on-airport general aviation service facility to compete with the existing privately owned service provider at Lovell Field Airport (CHA). The CMAA, which acts as regulator for and charges rents and fees to the private businesses operating on the airport, has now decided that it should also act as those businesses competitor.

History has shown the value of private investment in our nation’s airports. Across the state of Tennessee and around the nation, you will find thousands of aircraft service facilities funded and built by private investment. These service facilities act as catalysts, creating jobs and providing the services and support local businesses need to utilize aviation to expand their markets and grow their business. All of this is accomplished using private investment, not taxpayer funds.

Some in our industry have begun advocating for more local government-owned and operated (and taxpayer funded) general aviation service facilities, known as fixed base operators (FBO), to be constructed to compete with the existing private businesses. Many reasons are given for supporting this type of an operation, such as greater control over pricing and a supposed need for more competition. In all cases, however, the advocates ask for government grants to build these supposed “needed” facilities. The bottom line is government grants are needed so these airport-owned FBOs can enjoy a competitive advantage over private business since they face no need to amortize the cost of funding the construction of facilities and purchase of equipment the way a private company does. In effect, these airport-owned businesses enjoy access to “free money” that never needs to be paid back out of the businesses’ income.

Aside from the flatly unfair practice of allowing government to compete with private enterprise by using “free money,” we are faced with the stark reality that government is not as proficient or efficient at providing services as is private industry. One need look no further than Chattanooga to see the real effect of a government-run business competing with a private company. Despite receiving $10 million in government grants that it need not worry about ever paying back, the CMAA’s FBO has operated at a loss of over a half a million dollars in its first nine months. The CMAA predicted a full first year loss of only $250,000. The excess losses, much like the $10 million used to construct this facility, come directly from funds that could be used for other safety and security improvements in our aviation system.

Allowing this type of unlevel playing field to be constructed by airport sponsors will have only one long-term effect; the chilling of private investment at airports. As the stream of private investment begins to slow, more and more government funding will be needed to take its place, putting a further strain on already strained state and federal budgets. Funds that used to be used to expand capacity and create a safer and more secure aviation system will need to be diverted to support government-run businesses such as the one in Chattanooga.

NATA firmly believes that private business is the best route to provide quality services at our nation’s airports. History and the billions of private dollars that have been invested at airports across the nation prove the value that these private companies bring to our air transportation system. Now, with the CMAA having already used $10 million in government grants and poised to ask the state of Tennessee for $5 million more to expand its failing government-run FBO, I ask you to consider the role the state of Tennessee should have in this issue. Should the state allow its transportation grant funding to be used to allow airports to compete unfairly with existing private businesses or should it reaffirm that the role of government is to support and regulate private business, not compete with it?

I hope you will look further into the use of state funding to disadvantage on-airport private business and conclude, as I have, that government funds should not be used to compete with existing private business. If I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Working together, I believe we can ensure the future of the businesses that have made our airports and aviation system successful.

Sincerely,

James K. Coyne

President and CEO

Click here to view as pdf.

Click here for more information.

2012 Air Charter Summit Reaches New Heights

Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:13:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

2012 AIR CHARTER SUMMIT REACHES NEW HEIGHTS

Alexandria, VA, June 13, 2012 - This week, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) hosted one of its most successful Air Charter Summits. Attendance increased over the past two years' events, the Part 135 community found out about new NATA products and programs designed specifically for them, and NATA helped raise funds and awareness for the Veterans Airlift Command.

In the opening ceremony, long-time NATA staff member Jacqueline E. Rosser was presented the NATA President's Award for her many contributions to NATA members and staff over the past 15 years. NATA members also saluted James K. Coyne's 18 years of service as NATA's president and CEO with a tribute video. Coyne said, "We have a lot to look forward to as an industry. Looking back, I am most happy about the friendships that my wife Holly and I have made over the years." Walt Fricke, CEO, chairman and founder of the Veterans Airlift Command (VAC) shared information about his organization and thanked NATA for its support over the past two years.

The Tuesday agenda included a Federal Aviation Administration regulatory review, a special announcement from NATA on a new training product, and sessions on Part 135 training concerns, guidance for developing emergency response plans and common legal questions posed by operators.

Tuesday night's barbeque featured a raffle in support of the VAC that raised nearly $15,000. "NATA and its members are incredibly proud to support such a fine organization as the Veterans Airlift Command," stated Coyne. "We greatly appreciate all that Walt Fricke and his volunteer network do to assist American soldiers injured in combat."

Members can learn more about the VAC by clicking here. The raffle would not have been made possible without the generous contributions of the following organizations:

Jet Solutions
TAC Air
Signature Flight Support
SolutionsAir
NATA Compliance Services
Atlantic Aviation
ARAMARK Uniform Services

Wednesday's schedule included sessions on the expansion of excise taxes to aircraft management fees and international operations as well as a Transportation Security Administration update.

NATA announced a new Web-based program specifically for the Part 135 community called Aircraft Flight Coordinator Training (AFCT). AFCT is a certification program that provides core flight coordinator knowledge with an emphasis on safety. AFCT will be available soon and may be pre-purchased at a discount until July 31, 2012, by contacting safety1st@nata.aero.

NATA released two new publications in conjunction with the Air Charter Summit. An update of the Chartering An Aircraft: A Consumer Guide To Help You Fly Smarter and the Will-Not-Carry Operator Hazardous Materials Training Manual are now available on NATA's Web site. The charter consumer guide is a free publication available by download. The Will-Not-Carry Operator Hazardous Materials Training Manual is a downloadable and easily customizable publication.

"This year's Air Charter Summit provided a platform to launch several exciting new products and services specifically for the Part 135 community and to share the latest intelligence on pressing issues," stated Coyne. "I thank our members and Air Charter Summit attendees for their generous support of the VAC and make a personal commitment to help continue the good work of the VAC."

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Air Charter Summit Starts Today

Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:16:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA AIR CHARTER SUMMIT STARTS TODAY

Alexandria, VA, June 11, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA) annual Air Charter Summit kicks off this evening at the Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles with a welcome reception. Based on pre-registration numbers, NATA is expecting an increase in attendance over last year.

“We are looking forward to an engaging and information-packed summit,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “This year we have added more fun with a casual evening barbecue and an opportunity to win prizes while helping to support combat wounded soldiers.”

On Tuesday, the agenda includes a Federal Aviation Administration regulatory review, a special announcement from NATA on a new training product, and sessions on Part 135 training concerns, guidance for developing emergency response plans and common legal questions posed by operators. Later that evening, NATA will host a BBQ featuring a raffle to benefit the Veterans Airlift Command. Click here to find out how you can help support this worthy organization.

Wednesday’s schedule was modified to include sessions on the expansion of excise taxes to aircraft management fees and international operations as well as a Transportation Security Administration update.

NATA is also pleased to release two new publications in conjunction with the Air Charter Summit. An update of the Chartering An Aircraft: A Consumer Guide To Help You Fly Smarter and Will-Not-Carry Operator Hazardous Materials Training Manual are now available on NATA’s Web site. The charter consumer guide is a free publication available by download. The Will-Not-Carry Operator Hazardous Materials Training Manual is a downloadable and easily customizable publication that is available at a special show rate of $75.

Onsite registration as well as one-day passes are still available. Click here for more information.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

FAA Proposes Changes to Repair Station Rules

Thu, 24 May 2012 15:51:00 GMT

Regulatory Report

FAA PROPOSES CHANGES TO REPAIR STATION RULES

May 24, 2012

What's at Issue
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) titled Repair Stations that proposes significant changes to Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulation, Part 145, the rules governing all certificated repair stations.

Why It's Important
If finalized, this NPRM would make changes to repair station certification requirements and the system of repair station ratings and changes affecting repair stations providing maintenance to air carriers.

Major Provisions
The following chart depicts the proposed changes to repair station ratings.

Current Rating	New Proposed Rating
Airframe Class 1. Composite small 2. Composite large 3. All-metal small 4. All-metal large	Airframe Category 1. Aircraft certificated under Part 23 or 27 2. Aircraft certificated under Part 25 or 29 3. All other aircraft
Powerplant Class 1. Reciprocating engines, 400HP or less 2. Reciprocating engines, more than 400HP 3. Turbine engines	Powerplant Category 1. Reciprocating engines 2. Turbine engines 3. Auxiliary power units 4. All other powerplants
Propeller Class 1. All fixed and ground adjustable 2. All other propellers	Propeller Category 1. Fixed-pitch 2. Variable-pitch 3. All other propellers
Radio Class	Component
Instrument Class	Component
Accessory Class	Component
Limited Rating Specialized Service	Specialized Service
Limited Ratings (§ 145.61(b) lists 12 possible limited ratings)	Eliminated

In addition to the overhaul of repair station ratings, the proposed rule makes significant changes, generally aimed at clarifying existing language, to repair station certification requirements and the rules affecting repair stations performing maintenance for certificated air carriers.

The proposed changes would require all certificated repair stations to submit an application for certification under the new rules. The FAA proposes a 24-month "transition" period in which certificated repair station could continue to operate under the existing rules while preparing and waiting for the FAA to approve their application for certification under the new rules.

NATA Position
This NPRM contains rule changes that will affect the way repair stations are certificated and operate. The requirement for all repair stations to resubmit an application for certification during a 24-month "transition" period poses the potential for significant issues for existing repair stations.

NATA will be working closely with its members and the NATA Aircraft Maintenance and Systems Technology Committee to develop a full understanding of the impact of these proposed rule changes and to develop formal comments to the FAA.

Status
The NPRM is available for review here and is open for public comment through August 20, 2012.

Click here for more information.

NATA Summit to Raise Funds for Combat Wounded

Tue, 22 May 2012 14:45:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA SUMMIT TO RAISE FUNDS FOR COMBAT WOUNDED

Alexandria, VA, May 22, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) will hold a raffle at its 2012 Air Charter Summit barbeque to raise funds for the Veterans Airlift Command (VAC) mission to support our combat wounded. The VAC is a charitable organization that provides free air transportation to wounded warriors, veterans, and their families for medical and other compassionate purposes. NATA and VAC established a special fund last year, NATA Wings for Warriors, for NATA members and friends to contribute to the organization.

VAC was founded by retired U.S. Army helicopter pilot Walt Fricke, who grew the VAC mission from a single volunteer aircraft owner and pilot, himself, into a national network of more than 1700 volunteer aircraft owners and pilots. For the latest news on the VAC and to read stories from veterans and their families regarding the critical work of the VAC, click here.

What can you do to help?

Participate in the 2012 Air Charter Summit BBQ raffle. Special items will be raffled at the 2012 Air Charter Summit BBQ on Tuesday night, including a brand new third generation iPad! Raffle tickets will be available for purchase on-site during the summit. If you are interested in donating items for the raffle, please contact Daniel Gurley at dgurley@nata.aero.
Make a personal or corporate contribution to the NATA Wings for Warriors fund by clicking here.
Share the VAC mission with aircraft owners, fractional share owners and card program members. Ask them to donate flight hours to the VAC.

"We are honored to bring awareness to the Veterans Airlift Command and its important mission," said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "We encourage our members to consider not only making financial donations, but also offering aircraft and pilots for VAC flights; even a few hours a year would be a gracious contribution to VAC."

The VAC will also have a booth at the NATA 2012 Air Charter Summit to be held June 11-13 in Dulles, VA. Click here for more information on this event.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Releases 2012 Compensation Report

Wed, 16 May 2012 17:17:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA RELEASES 2012 COMPENSATION REPORT

Alexandria, VA, May 16, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) has published the results of its 2012 survey of general aviation service employee compensation. The 2012 Compensation Report includes salaries and benefits for pilots, line-service personnel and maintenance technicians.

Employee compensation is broken down by geographic region of the country, by the company's gross sales, by size of the town or city in which the company is located and by the number of employees in the company. In addition to pilots and maintenance technicians, the report includes compensation for inspectors and line service and customer service representatives, among others.

Association Research Inc., a leading economic research firm based in Rockville, Maryland, conducted the salary study. For privacy reasons, none of the individual responses are provided to NATA.

The 2012 Compensation Report is provided at no cost to NATA members who participated in the study. For non-participating members, the charge is $130 and $310 for non-NATA members.

A copy of the 2012 Compensation Report may be purchased on the NATA Web site at www.nata.aero under Products and Services and by clicking on Publications.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

EPA Issues Final Rules on Deicing

Fri, 11 May 2012 12:34:00 GMT

REGULATORY REPORT

EPA ISSUES FINAL RULES ON DEICING

May 11, 2012

What’s at Issue
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a prepublication version of a final rule titled Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Airport Deicing Category.

Why It’s Important
The rules promulgated in this final rule affect how airports must deal with wastewater created during aircraft deicing.

Major Provisions
This final rule contains two major provisions affecting airports:

Pavement Deicing
Any primary airport with more than 1,000 jet departures annually must not use a urea-based pavement deicer or must meet an effluent limitation for any discharge of ammonia.

Collection Requirement
Any new airport in a cold weather climate is required to collect 60% of used available deicing fluid. New airports can meet this collection requirement without having to document actual collected percentages through the use of centralized deicing pads.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased that the EPA accepted industry comments regarding the issues with promulgation of a nation-wide collection standard affecting existing airports and limited those requirements to new airports. As suggested by NATA’s comments, the EPA has left collection requirements for existing airports on a case-by-case permit basis.

Status
The final rule is expected to be published in the Federal Register within two weeks and will become effective 30 days after publication. The prepublication version of the rule is available here.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

Coyne Addresses Metropolitan Airport Commission

Fri, 11 May 2012 12:24:00 GMT

Statement Of James K. Coyne
President and CEO
National Air Transportation Association

Before the Metropolitan Airport Commission

Hearing on Proposed Changes to Ordinance 107

May 7, 2012
Lindbergh Conference Room
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450

Chairman Boivin and Members of the Commission,

I appear before you today as the president and CEO of the National Air Transportation Association (NATA). NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA's 2,000 member companies own, operate and service aircraft. These companies provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation and the military. NATA’s Airline Services Council (ASC) represents local, regional, state and international aviation services providers that operate at 425 airports in 67 countries. ASC member companies are an integral component of the national air transportation system offering a broad range of airline- and airport-related services, including aircraft refueling. NATA member companies operate business at several of the Metropolitan Airport Commission’s (MAC) airports.

The proposed changes to Ordinance 107 represent a significant increase in the cost of doing business and operating aircraft from the MAC’s reliever airports. The complexity of the proposed changes to Ordinance 107 prevent a simple assessment of cost; however, the removal of the reverse sliding scale, addition of landing fees and a fuel flowage fee all represent additional cost at the airports where they are newly imposed. The removal of the reverse sliding scale for percentage rent alone represents an increase of between 25% and 50% depending on a facility’s gross revenue. Since the MAC has not provided data on the assumptions used in developing these proposed changes, it is difficult for the affected business to estimate the final cost these changes will have.

The MAC finds itself in the reasonably unique position as the sponsor of a system of airports as opposed to an individual airport or several independent airports. Managing a group of airports as a system brings with it special benefits as well as added challenges. From the standpoint of setting airport rates and charges, the MAC has approached this task from a system-oriented viewpoint, recognizing that, although directly less profitable, certain services and facilities provide a less easy to measure benefit to the entire system. In its 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the MAC summarizes this policy, noting, “In order to promote and encourage the efficient use of facilities at all MAC airports…MAC has implemented a policy of subsidizing its reliever airports.”¹ While the MAC uses the term “subsidize,” I believe it more accurate to view this policy in terms of overall benefit to airport users and the local community.

The MAC has recognized that it can create more efficient and effective use of its system of airports by treating these airports as part of a system rather than as individual self-sufficient entities.

Current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) policy fully recognizes a sponsor’s ability to adopt this type of system.² It is vitally important for the commission to understand that its policy of managing the relievers as part of an airport system rather than as standalone airports is permitted. NATA would be pleased to assist with any communications with the FAA were the commission to have any concerns in this area.

Before proceeding, I belive the MAC must consider the effects that raising the cost of utilizing reliever airports will have on the entire airport system. The general aviation industry, the primary users of the reliever airports, has been particularly hard hit by the economic state of the nation, with reductions in hours flown and total fleet size over the past five years. The airports operated by the MAC have seen a decrease in general aviation traffic of over 23% from 2005 to 2010.³ However, despite these reductions in general aviation traffic, the revenue collected by the MAC from the reliever airports has increased by 11% over the past 3 years.⁴ This increasing revenue being derived from a smaller number of operation shows that the cost burden for the aircraft using the reliever airports is already increasing. With the proposed changes to Ordinance 107, the MAC is now considering a dramatic increase in that cost burden. The increase arising from the proposed changes would be both indirect, through the increased rates and charges paid by aeronautical service providers, and direct, through the addition of landing fees being imposed at two of the reliever airports.

The changes proposed by the MAC are complex, both in substance and effect. Not just are the amounts of the fees changing but the scope and method of collecting those fees is changing as well. With such a complex system of changes, it can be very difficult to forecast results. However, in light of the local decrease in general aviation traffic and the current national economic picture, NATA fears these changes may produce the unintended result of driving traffic away from the MAC’s reliever airports. Such a result would be catastrophic as it would erase the recent gains in revenue and threaten the ability of the existing aeronautical service providers to stay in business. As the sponsor of an airport system, the MAC must also consider what impact driving traffic away from the relievers might have on the Minniapolis/St. Paul (MSP) airport. In making the reliever airports a less attractive option, more general aviation traffic may utilize MSP, increasing congestion and costs.

Aside from direct costs to the MAC from a decrease in or change in utilization of airports by general aviation traffic, the commission must consider the impact upon the businesses that call the reliever airports home. A further reduction in general aviation operations threatens the ability of these companies to continue to be successful. Reduction in traffic would likely lead to reductions in staff, and less capital available for investment in equipment, facilities and facility maintenance, all of which have a negative long-term impact on the MAC and its airports system.

NATA is not without understanding in regard to the MAC’s issues relating to the reliever airports rates and charges. According to the March 23 letter to MAC airport tenants, the reliever airports are expected to experience a $2 million deficit at the conclusion of 2012. This $2 million deficit represents approximately 0.8 percent of the MAC entire operating expenses.⁵ The proposed changes to ordinance 107 to address this deficit will have very little benefit to the MAC’s overall bottom line, but risk significant impact in general aviation jobs and traffic at a moment when our economy is in the earliest of stages of recovery.

I firmly believe that highlighting issues without offering solutions does little to benefit anyone. NATA believes that the problems relating to the reliever airports highlighted by the proposed changes to Ordinance 107 are solvable and that the best path forward is a cooperative one that involves both the commission and the businesses that operate at the MAC’s reliever airports. I ask this commission to put these changes on hold and create a committee consisting of MAC staff, reliever airport business representatives and airport users that can review these issues and make suggestions on solutions that address the commission’s concerns. Such a committee would exactly represent the good faith effort that the FAA suggests when airport sponsors are considering changes to rates and charges policy:

Airport proprietors should consult with aeronautical users well in advance, if practical, of introducing significant changes in charging systems and procedures or in the level of charges. The proprietor should provide adequate information to permit aeronautical users to evaluate the airport proprietor’s justification for the change and to assess the reasonableness of the proposal. For consultations to be effective, airport proprietors should give due regard to the views of aeronautical users and to the effect upon them of changes in fees⁶

Up to this point, some of the reliever airport businesses have had little access to the data that underlies the reasoning behind the proposed changes to Proposition 107. Some only received the actual financial statements relating to the reliever airports just last week.

Without access to all the data and information underpinning the MAC’s proposal, these businesses lack the ability to fully assess the proposed changes. Additionally, the creation of such a committee would give the commission time to investigate fully the effects of increasing the cost of doing business and utilizing the reliever airports would have on the entire airport system, especially the possibility of increased congestion at MSP.

Through such a committee, the MAC would provide the opportunity for the full vetting of the issues affecting all stakeholders and promote the eventual acceptance of whatever course of action is chosen by the commission. NATA stands ready to assist in the process in any way possible. Thank you for your time and consideration of these comments.

^1. Page 11

^2. Policy Regarding the Establishment of Airport Rates and Charges, http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_compliance/

^3. 2010 MAC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, page 70

^4.MAC Income Statements 2009-2011

^5. Based upon 2011 figures, MAC 2011 Budget Book

^6. Policy Regarding the Establishment of Airport Rates and Charges, page 4

Click here for pdf.

Click here for more information.

NATF Announces New Scholarship

Fri, 11 May 2012 12:07:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATF ANNOUNCES NEW SCHOLARSHIP

Alexandria, VA, May 7, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Foundation (NATF) is pleased to announce the Navigate Your Future scholarship, the newest addition to the foundation’s scholarship program. This scholarship is offered to a graduating high school student continuing his or her education in the general aviation industry.

The scholarship applicant must be a graduating high school student planning a career in the general aviation field and accepted into an aviation-related program at an accredited college or university.

The applicant must submit along with his or her completed application the letter of acceptance from the college or university and a personal statement discussing his or her general aviation career aspirations, education plan, flight training goals and two or more reasons why he or she should be chosen for this scholarship.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA comments on FAA proposed 1500 Hour pilot training rule

Wed, 02 May 2012 12:06:00 GMT

April 30, 2012

Docket Operations, M–30
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12–140
West Building Ground Floor
Washington, DC 20590–0001

Submitted electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket # FAA-2010-0100, Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA's 2,000 member companies own, operate and service aircraft. These companies provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation and the military.

NATA has been very concerned with the possible negative safety and training effects arising from the passage of the Airline Safety and FAA Extension Act of 2010. Of particular concern is the mandatory establishment of a 1500-hour total flight time requirement for a pilot to operate in an airline environment. Our concern less involves the actual number of total hours required and is more focused on the lack of regulatory flexibility to adapt to new science in understanding how best to train a professional pilot. Under the scheme established by the act, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) retains little authority to adopt new training standards that, while possibly encompassing less than 1500 hours total time, might be proven to provide more comprehensive training, experience and benefit to safety.

However, under the framework established by the act the Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) becomes vitally important. The regulations established by this NPRM will guide the next generation of airline pilots and have an effect on the entire aviation industry, from small Part 61 flight schools to the largest airline.

Rule Summary

With this NPRM, the FAA proposes the following:

A requirement that all pilots operating under Part 121 must hold an ATP certificate
Pilots will be required to have obtained 50 hours of flight time in the class of airplane for the ATP certificate for which they are applying
A requirement for all pilots operating under Part 121 to hold a type rating, if available, for the aircraft they are operating
The creation of an ATP Certification Training Program that would be required for all applicants seeking an ATP with a multi-engine rating or type rating
- This training course would require:
  - 25 hours of classroom training
  - 16 hours of mandated turbine flight simulator training
The creation of a restricted privileges ATP Certificate allowing certain pilots (ex-military and those graduating from an aviation degree program/flight training program) to act as SIC under Part 121 with less than 1500 hours total time
A requirement of 1000 hours of Air Carrier operations to serve as PIC under Part 121

Specific Comments

ATP Certification Training Program

Recommendation – Due to the costs and reductions in safety inherent in the ATP CTP, NATA recommends that the FAA withdraw the proposed Part 61, Section 154. Rather, modifications to the existing ATP aeronautical experience, knowledge and training requirements should be made. These changes can effectively address the conceptual training that the FAA has envisioned with the ATP CTP. Due to the cost and possibility of negative learning experiences, any mandated simulator training should be integrated into an air carrier training program rather than as a stand-alone certification requirement.

The proposed modifications to the ATP Certificate, in an attempt to meet the requirements set forth in Section 217 of the Airline Safety Act of 2010, have resulted in shifting airline-centric training away from the airlines themselves onto the individual pilot. As outlined in the preamble, air carriers can ask for a reduction in their initial training hours based upon a pilot’s completion of the ATP CTP. This shift of training burden greatly increases the cost of training to the individual pilot, increases the opportunity for negative learning experiences and creates a disincentive for pilots to pursue additional certification.

In this rulemaking and the associated analysis, the FAA has presented the ATP CTP as a program that will likely be performed by air carriers in advance of or during applicable initial or upgrade training¹. NATA believes that analyzing this proposal in this manner is not appropriate. The ATP CTP is a regulatory requirement that is imposed upon individuals, not air carriers or other certificated entities. As stated in the rule preamble, the ATP CTP “would be a basic certification requirement, not an air carrier training program requirement.”². Since no requirement exists or is proposed that requires air carriers to provide the ATP CTP, we believe the FAA must perform its analysis of this proposal assuming the impact is on individual pilots pursuing ATP certification.

The Initial Regulatory Analysis for this rule estimates the ATP CTP will be a seven-day course with an estimated cost of $5771³. The FAA’s use of a framework that has the cost of the program being be borne by Part 121 air carriers leads to numerous assumptions on cost factors that result in an overall lower cost estimate than if the cost of the program were borne by individuals. These lower cost factors are a direct result of the efficiencies in training available to an air carrier such as utilizing its own training personal as opposed to contracting with a third party, combining multiple training events and negating additional travel costs by combining training events⁴. Individual pilots seeking ATP certification do not have access to these efficiencies and would be required to contract with a third party to complete the ATP CTP. Since the regulatory requirement to complete the ATP CTP affects individuals, not air carriers, the cost of the program must be calculated based up factors derived from an individual pilots’ cost in completing the required training.

Aside from cost, the shifting of training from an air carrier training program to individual pilots also poses the risk of negative learning situations arising from overgeneralization and in-applicable topics. Training providers seeking to offer an ATP CTP will be forced to create a program that is as broad as possible to give the provider as large a customer base as possible. Topics that were once covered in specific air carrier initial training will now be taught in a fashion that makes them applicable to as large a population as possible, likely leading to the loss of functional applicability to a specific air carriers operating environment. NATA’s position on this issue is not that these topics should not be taught to prospective air carrier pilots but rather they should be taught as part of an air carrier training program thus allowing the pilot to gain as much specific knowledge and experience as possible that will be applicable to the environment and conditions in which they will be operating.

In addition to over-generalization of training topics, the ATP CTP also creates negative learning situations by forcing pilots into non-applicable training. As proposed, the new section 154 requires simulator training to be performed in a device that “represents a multi-engine turbine aircraft”⁵. However, the requirement to complete the ATP CTP applies to any pilot who seeks an ATP with airplane category, multi-engine class rating or type rating. There are many pilots who will be required by regulation to hold an ATP, and thus complete the training in a turbine simulator, who will be operating a turboprop or piston engine aircraft. This pushing of a pilot into a training event that is inapplicable to their experience and operational goals will lead to a negative experience that does not increase safety. Also as outlined below, many pilots of turboprop and piston-engine aircraft who are not required to hold an ATP still seek the ATP rating and forcing those pilots to train in a turbine simulator will create a negative experience that could affect safety.

Finally, the FAA appears to fail to understand the broad use the ATP certificate has achieved throughout the industry. Despite its name, the ATP certificate has been used for many years by segments of the industry where an ATP rating is not mandated by regulation. As an additional level of certification above commercial pilot, the ATP certificate is commonly used by many Part 91 operators and non-turbojet Part 135 operators as an advanced threshold for pilot hiring. Many insurance companies utilize the ATP certificate as a threshold for pilot qualification in covered Part 91 operations. This expanded use of the ATP beyond its regulatory mandate provides an overall benefit to safety. However, as written the ATP CTP will act as a disincentive for pilots to complete this additional level of certification due to cost and the risk of negative learning events. NATA believes that the FAA should tread cautiously when a new proposal, such as the ATP CTP, threatens existing, voluntary measures that benefit safety, especially when other methods of achieving the same goal exist.

NATA’s recommendation that the proposal for the creation of an ATP CTP should not be construed in a manner that suggests the association does not see value in additional conceptual training for prospective ATP candidates. NATA’s position is based upon the specifics of the proposed manner of providing that training. We believe that the additional training mandated by section 217 of the Airline Safety Act and of nearly equivalent value to that obtained through the proposed ATP CTP can be accomplished at a lower cost through the modifications of the knowledge and training regulations governing the ATP certification. Insertion of required training topics, much like is done with other certification levels, will create an environment where pilots are able to utilize less burdensome training methods, such as on-line course delivery.

ATP Certificate with Restricted Privileges Based Upon Academic Credit or Military Experience

Recommendation – NATA recommends that the FAA expand the flight hour credit proposal to include a comprehensive framework similar to the recommendations of the FOQ ARC and any other science-based advanced training courses that provide a benefit to safety. In the event that the FAA chooses not to expand this proposal, NATA recommend that the FAA withdraw this proposal in its entirety until such time as the agency can create a more comprehensive framework.
Section 217 of the Airline Safety Act of 2012 permits the FAA to establish flight hour credits for the completion of “academic” courses. The flight hour credits would reduce the number of total hours needed to be eligible to obtain an ATP certificate. The act further requires that in establishing these credits the administrator must determine that completion of an academic course in combination with a reduced number of total flight hours will provide more safety benefit than would meeting the full flight hour requirement without completing the course.

In this rulemaking, the FAA proposes creating a “Restricted Privileges” ATP Certificate that can be obtained with reduced total flight time hours. Applicants who complete a four-year baccalaureate aviation degree program and commercial pilot certification with an affiliated Part 141 flight school are eligible for the restricted privileges ATP with only 1000 total flight hours. Former military pilots can receive the restricted ATP with only 750 hours.

While NATA agrees with the idea of incentivizing additional training and education that has a safety benefit, we are perplexed by the FAA’s approach to this proposal. The FAA chartered First Officers Qualifications Aviation Rulemaking Committee (FOQ ARC) developed a proposal for offering flight hour credit for specific training events such as completion of a four-year degree, two-year degree, Certified Flight Instructor Rating and Advanced Jet Transition training.

The FAA indicated that it rejected the First Officer Qualifications Aviation Rulemaking Committee’s (FOQ ARC) recommendation for a framework of flight hour credits because the “Act [does not permit] giving added flight hour credit to certain types of flight experience to reduce the minimum required flight hours for the ATP certificate”⁶. However, the proposals for flight hour credits contained in this rulemaking all require a mix of “academic” training and flight experience just like the proposed FOQ ARC framework. The primary difference between the FAA proposal and the FOQ ARC proposal is that the FAA proposal is far more limited in training options for receiving flight hour credits.

NATA believes that for this rulemaking to provide safety benefits it must incentivize additional advanced training that provides a safety benefit. As written, the proposal does little more than create a bottle neck in the training process by only incentivizing one option for flight hour credits. The FAA’s statement that it is prohibited from implementing the other credit options envisioned by the FOQ ARC is unpersuasive as there is no discernable difference between the training and flight experienced combinations proposed by the FOQ ARC and the training and flight experience requirements contained in the FAA’s four-year degree and military training proposal.

ATP Minimum Age

Recommendation – NATA recommends that the FAA remove the age penalty for ATP applicants who do not qualify for a restricted privilege ATP certificate by allowing pilots who have met the requirements of 14 CFR 61.159 to qualify for a restricted privileges ATP.

The proposed rules create a two-year age penalty that allows former military pilots or those who have completed an applicable four-year aviation degree program to act as second-in-command in a Part 121 operation at age 21 while requiring others to be at least 23 years of age prior to ATP certification.

The FAA provides no details on why it has established this age differential; however, it is assumed that the FAA has made a determination that 21-year-old applicants pose sufficient maturity to exercise the limited privileges of a restricted privileges ATP. NATA believes that other explanations for this age penalty would not be justified; completion of a four-year degree program or certification as a military pilot would not necessarily speed up the natural maturation process.

Under the assumption that a 21-year-old pilot posses sufficient maturity to exercise the limited privileges of a restricted privileges ATP certificate, NATA recommends that the FAA establish a pathway whereby non-military pilots who have not completed a four-year degree program can be eligible to receive a restricted privileges ATP certificate at age 21 and 1500 hours of total flight time.

Answers To Selected Questions Posed By The FAA

ATP Certificate for All Pilots Operating Under Part 121

Is a minimum of 1,500 hours adequate in order to receive an unrestricted ATP certificate? Why or why not?

Yes, 1500 hours is the statutory minimum and the FAA has not presented any evidence of a need to increase that requirement.

Aeronautical Experience Requirement in the Class of Airplane for the ATP Certificate Sought

Is 50 hours in class of airplane too high, too low, or adequate in order to receive an ATP certificate with airplane category multi-engine class rating?

NATA concurs with the requirement for 50 hours in class of airplane.

Aircraft Type Rating for All Pilots Operating Under Part 121

Should all SICs be required to hold an aircraft type rating if the aircraft currently requires a type rating for the PIC, regardless of the rule part under which the aircraft is operated (e.g. Part 91, 125, or 135)? Why or why not?

NATA believes this question is not relevant to this rulemaking as the FAA has not proposed such a requirement or its rational for doing so. Absent conclusive evidence of a need for requiring a type rating for SIC in Part 91, 125 or 135, NATA would not agree with any proposal to do so. A pilot’s gaining of experience in actual SIC operations is highly valuable and provides an avenue to higher certification for the pilot.

ATP Certification Training Program for an Airplane Category Multi-engine Class Rating or Type Rating

Should pilots wanting to obtain an ATP certificate with airplane category multi-engine class rating or type rating be required to take an additional training course prior to taking the knowledge test? Why or why not?

NATA supports the idea of additional classroom and flight experience requirements for the issuance of an ATP certificate. However, we do not support the proposed requirement of an “approved” training program. NATA asserts that if the FAA believes that an “approved” training program for ATP is essential then it is up to the agency to provide evidence of that need as opposed to using a less burdensome alternative such as increasing knowledge and experience requirement. NATA does not support the requirement of a mandatory turbine flight simulator training for all multi-engine and type rating ATP certificates.
If academic training is required in an ATP certification training course, what topics are appropriate? How many hours are appropriate for such a course?

NATA supports the findings of the FOQ ARC in this matter.
Should an ATP certification training course include non-type specific FSTD training on concepts that are generally universal to transport category aircraft? Why or why not?

No. A requirement such as this shifts the cost burden of training for air carrier operations from the air carrier to the individual pilot. This type of training would, by necessity, be very general in nature and immediately be superseded by airline initial training and, therefore, provide little additional benefit for the costs imposed on the individual pilot.
If FSTD training is required, what level of FSTD is appropriate? How many hours are appropriate?

NATA does not support mandated generalized FSTD training as a prerequisite for ATP certification.
Based on the proposed content of the ATP Certification Training Program, what changes or reductions could be made to a Part 121 air carrier training program?

None. Surely it is not the FAA’s intent to allow Part 121 air carriers to reduce their training hours due to training provided by another air carrier or third-party training provider. In the event that an air carrier provides the pre-certification training to its own pilots, credit should be allowed to apply to the carriers training program.
The FAA assumes Parts 121, 135, 141, and 142 certificate holders will be able to provide the ATP Certification Training Program. What factors would these certificate holders principally consider in determining whether or not to offer the course?

The costs imposed by the simulator training requirement (to include one-off contracts for training – i.e. not bulk, and travel costs) will be a strong disincentive for the Part 135 operator to provide training so a pilot (new hire or otherwise) could obtain an ATP. Many Part 135 certificate holders conduct operations where an ATP is not required to serve as PIC. However, today many operators for various safety, insurance and liability reasons do provide the pilot with the training and support necessary to obtain an ATP and also require an ATP to serve as PIC. If implemented as proposed, the requirements of the ATP CTP will serve as a strong disincentive for Part 135 operators to comply with a higher standard than is required, posing a negative safety consequence.

For many operators utilizing non-type rated multi-engine aircraft, the mandate to provide 16 hours of turbine simulator time is costly and creates a negative learning possibility for the pilot. Learning to operate a jet aircraft when the intended operations are in multi-engine piston or turbo-prop aircraft provides little benefit to the pilot, the air carrier and ultimately the passenger/customer. The substantial costs to supply simulator time in an aircraft that is totally unlike the aircraft the pilot will fly for the operator is enough of a negative consequence for operators to change their policies regarding whether a PIC has an ATP.

Because the ATP CTP requires simulator time, the FAA is mandating that Part 135 operators contract with Part 142 training centers. Today, there are no mandates in Part 135 to use simulators – all required training may be conducted in-house and in-aircraft. No Part 135 operators of which we are aware own or exclusively lease their own simulators. Due to the aircraft fleet diversity present in Part 135, it is absolutely impractical for the certificate holder to even contemplate simulator acquisition. NATA strongly objects to the FAA’s effective mandate for Part 135 that they contract with a third party for pilot training by failing to provide an in-house, in-aircraft training option.

ATP Certificate With Restricted Privileges Based on Academic and Military Training

Should the FAA offer an ATP certificate with restricted privileges for pilots with fewer than 1,500 flight hours based on academic training and/or experience? Why or why not? If so, how many hours would be appropriate? Should anyone other than military pilots or graduates of four-year colleges and universities with aviation-related degrees and commercial pilot certificates with instrument ratings obtained from an affiliated Part 141 pilot school be eligible? Why or why not?

Not as proposed. Congress provided the FAA the ability to allow for reduced hours based upon a balance of safety assessment. The FAA has performed no such assessment. NATA supports reduced hours in a comprehensive system of experience and training credits similar to that proposed by the FOQ ARC.
Should military pilots be allowed to receive an ATP certificate with restricted privileges? Why or why not? If so, is the proposed 750 hours too high, too low, or adequate?

Allowing reduction in total flight hours for former military pilots should be a part of any comprehensive assessment of the many existing advance training programs and courses.
Should graduates of four-year colleges and universities with aviation-related majors and commercial pilot certificates with instrument ratings obtained from an affiliated Part 141 pilot school be allowed to receive an ATP certificate with restricted privileges? Why or why not? If so, is the proposed 1,000 hours too high, too low, or adequate?

As stated in the specific comments, NATA believes that there is a safety value to many different training programs that are above the existing certification minimum. NATA disagrees with the FAA’s approach of singling out only two possible sources for flight hour credit and believes the dangers of providing such a limited set of options outweighs the possible benefits. NATA would, however, support a comprehensive framework similar to that proposed by the FOQ ARC.
Should the FAA consider an alternative licensing structure for pilots who desire only to fly for a Part 121 air carrier (e.g. multicrew pilot license)? Why or why not?

NATA is supportive of any efforts to utilize a training regimen that is based upon the latest science, provides the greatest benefit to safety and is cost effective.

Minimum of 1,000 Hours in Air Carrier Operations To Serve as PIC in Part 121 Operations

Should the proposed PIC time in Part 91 subpart K or Part 135 operations count towards the Part 121 PIC requirement? Why or why not?

Yes. Part 135 and 91K operations occur in diverse areas of operations – with flights to and from thousands of more airports than those served by the Part 121 carriers. The flight planning, operational requirements/restrictions, and dispatch functions are all very similar to the Part 121 environment.
Should SIC time outside of Part 121 operations count towards the proposed requirement? Why or why not?

Yes, experience in multiple operational scenarios is beneficial to the overall skills of the pilot.

Closing

NATA appreciates the opportunity to present its comments on this NPRM. NATA believes that producing knowledgeable, proficient and safe pilots is vital to the ongoing success of our industry. We also believe that training should be science based. The last few decades have seen significant improvements in our understanding of how individual learn and retain information and skills. NATA is alarmed by what appears to be a turn away from science-based training and a return to a statistical model of training (i.e., given enough time it is statistically likely that a pilot will have encountered enough varying environments to ensure that they are proficient). The statistical model is not just outdated, it is costly. Today’s air carrier operations demand well trained and experienced pilots, a result that is best obtained by defined training options and experience. NATA hopes the FAA will proceed in a manner that takes into account what we have learned about how pilots learn and applies that knowledge in a manner that creates safer pilots at a reasonable cost.

Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs

¹ See 77 Federal Register at 12390 and Initial Regulatory Evaluation, Docket #, FAA-2010-0100-1352, page 14

² See 77 Federal Register at 12383

³ Initial Regulatory Evaluation, pages 14-16

⁴ It should be noted that even when assuming training is provided directly by an air carrier for its own employees, the FAA has still failed to account for the dramatic cost differences between Part 121 operations and smaller Part 135 and 91 subpart k operators. These smaller operators do not have the ability to utilize in-house training personnel to the same extent as a large airline and usually train far smaller class sizes (often one or two pilots at a time). This lack of ability to utilize efficiencies the way large airlines do would lead to significantly higher costs. Should the FAA reject NATA’s comment that costs of the ATP CTP should be computed based upon impact to the regulated individual pilot, NATA asserts that the FAA still must modify its estimates to reflect the higher training costs faced by Part 135 and 91 subpart K operators.

⁵ Proposed 14 CFR 61 Section 154(b), 77 Federal Register, at 12402

⁶ Each of the areas for which the FOQ ARC proposes offering credit include a combination of knowledge (academic) and flight training or experience. The proposed four- year aviation degree + Commercial pilots Certificate is identical in that it also requires a combination of knowledge (degree) and flight training (commercial pilot certification).

Click here for more information.

Ask House And Senate Highway Bill Conference To Repeal Fuel Fraud Tax Today!

Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:54:00 GMT

Action Call

ASK HOUSE AND SENATE HIGHWAY BILL CONFEREES TO REPEAL FUEL FRAUD TAX TODAY!

April 26, 2012

What's at Issue
NATA is requesting its members to contact Members of Congress serving on the conference committee established to resolve differences between the House and Senate versions of the Highway Bill and urge them to support repeal of the onerous fuel fraud tax.

Why It's Important
The conference committee is one of the last steps in the legislative process before an agreement is finalized on the Highway Bill and it is approved by both the House and Senate and then signed into law by the President.

Members of the House-Senate Conference Committee on H.R. 4348 include:

U.S. House of Representatives Conferees and Staff:

Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA) - Chad Ramey, chad.ramey@mail.house.gov
Rob Bishop (R-UT) - Wayne Bradshaw, wayne.bradshaw@mail.house.gov
Timothy Bishop (D-NY) - Mark Copeland, mark.copeland@mail.house.gov
Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) - David Skillman, david.skillman@mail.house.gov
Leonard Boswell (D-IA) - Ross Maradian, ross.maradian@mail.house.gov
Corrine Brown (D-FL) - Nick Martinelli, nick.martinelli@mail.house.gov
Larry Bucshon (R-IN) -Teresa Buckley, teresa.buckley@mail.house.gov
Dave Camp (R-MI) - Adam Pradko, adam.pradko@mail.house.gov
Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) - Andrew Stasiowski, andrew.stasiowski@mail.house.gov
Jerry Costello (D-IL) - Sarah Blackwood, sarah.blackwood@mail.house.gov
Chip Cravaack (R-MN) - Ian Foley, ian.foley@mail.house.gov
Rick Crawford (R-AR) - Ted Verrill, ted.verrill@mail.house.gov
Elijah Cummings (D-MD) - Angela Hanks, angela.hanks@mail.house.gov
Peter DeFazio (D-OR) - Karmen Fore, karmen.fore@mail.house.gov
John Duncan (R-TN) - Don Walker, don.walker@mail.house.gov
Ralph Hall (R-TX) - Jessica Carter, jessica.carter@mail.house.gov
Richard Hanna (R-NY) - Andrew Brady, andrew.brady@mail.house.gov
Doc Hastings (R-WA) - Justin Prosser, justin.prosser@mail.house.gov
Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) - Caryn Compton, caryn.compton@mail.house.gov
James Lankford (R-OK) - Brittnee Preston, brittnee.preston@mail.house.gov
Edward Markey (D-MA) - William Spring, william.spring@mail.house.gov
John Mica (R-FL) - Brian Waldrip, brian.waldrip@mail.house.gov
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) - Lisette Morton, lisette.morton@mail.house.gov
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) - Robert White, robert.white@mail.house.gov
Nick Rahall (D-WV) - Aaron Pritchard, aaron.pritchard@mail.house.gov
Reid Ribble (R-WI) - Kyle Roskam, kyle.roskam@mail.house.gov
Bill Shuster (R-PA) - Stephen Martinko, stephen.martinko@mail.house.gov
Steve Southerland (R-FL) - Karen Williams, Karen.williams@mail.house.gov
Pat Tiberi (R-OH) - Brad Bailey, brad.bailey@mail.house.gov
Fred Upton (R-MI) - Mark Ratner, mark.ratner@mail.house.gov
Henry Waxman (D-CA) - Travis Moore, travis.moore@mail.house.gov
Edward Whitfield (R-KY) - Taylor Booth, taylor.booth@mail.house.gov
Don Young (R-AK) - Scott Leathard, scott.leathard@mail.house.gov

U.S. Senate Conferees and Staff:

Max Baucus (D-MT) - Tom Lynch, thomas_lynch@baucus.senate.gov
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) - Kyle Chapman, kyle_chapman@boxer.senate.gov
Richard Durbin (D-IL) - Tom Kotarac, tom_kotarac@durbin.senate.gov
Orrin Hatch (R-UT) - John Tanner, john_tanner@hatch.senate.gov
John Hoeven (R-ND) - Jessica Yearous, jessica_yearous@hoeven.senate.gov
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) - Landon Hairgrove, landon_hairgrove@hutchison.senate.gov
James Inhofe (R-OK) - Nathan Reese, nathan_reese@inhofe.senate.gov
Tim Johnson (D-SD) - Todd Stubbendieck, todd_stubbendieck@johnson.senate.gov
Robert Menendez (D-NJ) - Michael Passante, michael_passante@menendez.senate.gov
Bill Nelson (D-FL) - Jenny Solomon, jenny_solomon@billnelson.senate.gov
John D. Rockefeller (D-WV) - Pat Bond, patrick_bond@rockefeller.senate.gov
Richard Shelby (R-AL) - Andrew_newton@shelby.senate.gov
Charles Schumer (D-NY) - Anne Fiala, anne.fiala@schumer.senate.gov
David Vitter (R-LA) - Bryan Zumwalt, bryan_zumwalt@vitter.senate.gov

What to Do
Contact each conferee via email by clicking on the email addresses of each Member of Congress above. Please contact each conferee today, regardless if they are your Member of Congress or not, to request they support repeal of the onerous fuel fraud tax!

NATA members are encouraged to utilize the following talking points and attach the Fuel Fraud White Paper to their emails to conferees or when talking to congressional staff members:

Prior to October 1, 2005, aviation fuel was taxed at 21.9 cents per gallon (CPG), and the taxes collected were deposited immediately into the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.
The Highway Bill changed the collection of aviation fuel taxes. Now, aviation fuel is taxed at the same rate as highway diesel fuel, 24.4 CPG, but the fuel provider still only owes 21.9 CPG to the government. It is up to the fuel provider or "ultimate registered vendor" (a term defined in the bill), to request a refund for the 2.5 CPG difference in taxes paid and taxes actually owed.
The provision mandated that all taxes be deposited into the Highway Trust Fund and only when the operator applies for the refund does the money transfer to the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. When a refund is requested, the operator gets the 2.5 CPG back and the remaining 21.9 CPG is transferred from the Highway Trust Fund to the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. If the operator does not request a refund, all tax money stays in the Highway Trust Fund and the Airport and Airway Trust Fund receives nothing.
Many operators are not applying for this refund. The Internal Revenue Service has issued limited guidance on the matter, so operators, who have never had to deal with a system of tax refunds, have no idea how to apply for the refund. The term "ultimate registered vendor" is not defined in the bill. While most assume it to be the fixed base operator, that hasn't been officially decided yet. Also, the 2.5 CPG difference is small enough that many operators are simply passing the higher costs along to the consumer, which is resulting in a de facto tax increase.
This diversion of aviation fuel taxes costs the Airport and Airway Trust Fund approximately $50 million per year. Estimates state that the provision will cost the Airport and Airway Trust Fund close to $500 million over ten years, although that number could rise significantly if more operators do not apply for the refund.
This provision was included amid concerns that highway truck drivers are purchasing aviation jet fuel and mixing it with another agent to use in their trucks. The aviation industry disputes this claim, noting that there is no documented evidence of this happening on a widespread level.

NATA Position
The national airspace system has been unnecessarily deprived of funds needed to enhance safety and efficiency due to the fuel fraud provision mandating that funds be deposited in the Highway Trust Fund. It is imperative that all taxes on jet fuel, used in aviation, are deposited in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.

A recent letter sent by 32 members of the U.S. House of Representatives reinforces the association's concerns with this unnecessary and onerous tax on the aviation business community.

Status
The conference committee could meet as early as May 7, but much of the work leading up to the meeting takes place at the staff level starting now. It is critical that NATA members contact Highway Bill Conferees today!

Staff Contact: Eric Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
ebyer@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

House Lawmakers Request Fuel Fraud Repeal

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:06:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

HOUSE LAWMAKERS REQUEST FUEL FRAUD REPEAL

Alexandria, VA, April 26, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) applauds the efforts of U.S. Representatives Sam Graves (R-MO) and John Barrow (D-GA) in spearheading a letter to Representative Dave Camp (R-MI), chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means, requesting his support in repealing a provision known as "fuel fraud" that is part of the final highway reauthorization bill. The letter was signed by 32 members of the U.S. House of Representatives.

"Since October 1, 2005, the Airport and Airway Trust Fund has been deprived of critical funding because the fuel fraud provision allowed non commercial jet fuel taxes to be deposited into the Highway Trust Fund," explained NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "The IRS process for fuel vendors is voluntary, allowing taxes intended for the Airport and Airways Trust Fund to remain in the Highway Trust Fund.

"This diversion of aviation fuel taxes has cost the Airport and Airway Trust Fund approximately $50 million annually and is anticipated to cost another $500 million over the next ten years.

"NATA member companies have been heavily burdened by the IRS fuel vendor process, often resulting in extensive audits and the ultimate decision not to file for the fuel tax refund. We greatly appreciate the support of all 32 House Members on an issue that is so important to the association's membership and the aviation trust fund."

In addition to Reps. Graves and Barrow, the letter was signed by several members of the House General Aviation Caucus, including Reps. Leonard Boswell (D-IA), Richard Hanna (R-NY), Randy Hultgren (R-IL), Andy Harris (R-MD), Laura Richardson (D-CA), Howard Coble (R-NC), Collin Peterson (D-MN), Jerry Costello (D-IL), Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA), Paul Gosar (R-AZ), John Carter (R-TX), Scott Tipton (R-CO), Billy Long (R-MO), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Bill Flores (R-TX), Chip Cravaack (R-MN), Bob Filner (D-CA), Mike Pompeo (R-KS), Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA), Dave Loebsack (D-IA), Russ Carnahan (D-MO), Hank Johnson (D-GA), Todd Rokita (R-IN), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Gene Green (D-TX), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), Ron Paul (R-TX), Daniel Lungren (R-CA), Tom Latham (R-IA) and Lou Barletta (R-PA).

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments on EPA Underground Tank Rule

Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:22:00 GMT

April 16, 2012

EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC)

Mail Code 2822T

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.

Washington, DC 20460

Submitted electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket # EPA-HQ-UST–2011–0301, Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations—Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA's 2,000 member companies own, operate and service aircraft. These companies provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation and the military. NATA’s Airline Service Council (ASC) represents local, regional, state and international aviation service providers that operate at 425 airports in 67 countries. ASC member companies are an integral component of the national air transportation system (NAS) offering a broad range of airline- and airport-related services, including aircraft refueling.

With this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to modify the1988 underground storage tank (UST) technical, financial responsibility, and state program approval regulations. As part of this rulemaking, the EPA also proposes removing the deferral for Airport Hydrant Fuel Distribution Systems (AHFDS) contained in the 1988 regulations. The removal of this deferral would subject hydrant systems at certain U.S. commercial service airports to the UST regulations proposed in this NPRM.

NATA is very concerned with the EPA’s proposed removal of the deferral of AHFDSs. This concern arises from the fact that, while the EPA appears to believe that this rulemaking will have little effect on commercial service airports, industry evaluations of the scope of this rulemaking indicate that the universe of affected commercial service airports could be 300-400 percent larger than estimated by the EPA. Due to the nature of operations at commercial service airports, as well as their role in the national airspace system, such a “grey area” in scope of applicability and impact is intolerable.

Scope of Affected Commercial Service Airports

This rulemaking contains virtually no information on the EPA’s processes for determining the number of commercial service airports that would be affected by the removal of the deferral for AHDFs. The Assessment of the Potential Costs, Benefits, and Other Impacts of the Proposed Revisions to EPA's Underground Storage Tank Regulations[1] contradicts itself by indicating that there only two commercial service airport hydrant systems meeting the definition of a covered AHFDS and also stating that military hydrant systems represent 100 percent of the possibly regulated AHFDS. No information is provided on the methodology by which the EPA reached either of these contradictory assertions. In the case of the assertion that two commercial service airports would be regulated, no information is provided regarding even to which airports the agency is referring.

The unsupported conclusion, that commercial service airports would not be affected by this rulemaking, permeates this rulemaking as the EPA assumes that virtually all regulated AHFDS will be at military facilities and thus tailors its discussion of the rule to those facilities. The EPA’s assumption is also illustrated by the statement that “Nearly all airport hydrant systems are owned by the federal government.”[2] This statement represents another contradiction as the aforementioned regulatory analysis documents indicate that roughly 20 percent of all hydrant systems are located at commercial service airports, which are not owned by the federal government.

While the EPA’s reliance upon an undocumented critical assumption combined with what appears to be a general lack of understanding of commercial service airport hydrant systems calls into question the decision to include removal of the deferral for AHFDSs in this rulemaking, the decision appears even more ill-considered in the light of industry evaluations that assert many more commercial service airports may be regulated.

In its comments to the docket, Airlines for America (A4A) concludes that at least seven other commercial service airport hydrants systems may be regulated once the deferral is removed. The difference between A4A’s assessment and the EPA’s own assessment of the number of commercial service airports affected is directly related to the lack of information and interpretation available in this rulemaking and the associated docket. In addition to the information available in this rulemaking being unhelpful in assessing the scope of applicability, the EPA’s actions have added to the uncertainty. In February 28, 2012, more than three months after the NPRM’s publication in the Federal Register, the EPA posted a revised schematic to the docket that attempted to address how the layouts of various hydrant systems would be regulated. In addition to demonstrating the EPA’s lack of forethought regarding airport hydrant systems at commercial service airports, the revised schematic also still leaves uncertain how the EPA would regulate certain other existing hydrant system layouts.

NATA believes that the EPA’s failure to support its assumption that commercial service airports would be largely unaffected by this rulemaking along with the existing ambiguities in how the definition of an AHFDS would be applied to those airports are sufficient to advise against removing the deferral for AHFDS. Furthermore, when that failure and the existing ambiguities are paired with the vital role that commercial service airports play in our integrated NAS the decision to remove the deferral at this point is unsupportable.

Impacts of Removing the Deferral for AHFDS

The EPA has, based upon its unsupported assertion that commercial service airports would be largely unaffected by this rulemaking, provided no analysis of how the removal of the deferral for AHFDS could affect commercial service airport operations. In light of the issues raised in these and other industry comments NATA believes that the EPA must assess the impact of removing the deferral for AHFDs on commercial service airports.

The impact of removing the deferral for AHFDs on commercial service airports, unlike that at other facilities regulated by the EPA underground storage tank (UST) rules, is defined as much by effect on operations as by cost of complying with rule components. Commercial service operations revolve around the ability to handle traffic flow efficiently, a significant component of which is fuel delivery. Disruptions to hydrant system operations resulting from compliance with the UST rules would lead to flight delays and possible cancellations. The integrated nature of our NAS means that disruptions occurring at a single airport can quickly cascade through the entire system.

According to the FAA, commercial operations represent more than 5 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product and 10 million jobs[3]. In 2011, over 700 million individuals utilized air travel from commercial service airports[4]. Basing its rationale upon the undocumented assumption that commercial airports would be largely unaffected by this rulemaking, the EPA has not made any attempt to gain even the most basic understanding of how the proposed rules could affect airport operations and the NAS.

Recommendation

In this rulemaking, the EPA has relied upon unsupported conclusions contradicted by recent industry analysis that commercial service airports would be largely unaffected by the removal the deferral for AHFDs as reasoning not to investigate fully the feasibility and impact of compliance for these airports. The ambiguities inherent in this rulemaking combined with lack of in-depth assessment of impact on commercial service airports present significant dangers to these airports.

NATA does not believe that the EPA can proceed on sound footing with removing the deferral for AHFDS. NATA further believes that the investigation and documentation required to determine adequately the scope of commercial service airports affected by the removal of the deferral along with the impacts (including airport and NAS operations) of complying with the UST rules necessitate a separate rulemaking process.

NATA respectfully requests that the EPA withdraw the proposal for removing the deferral for AHFDS from this rulemaking. NATA would be pleased to work closely with the EPA in a separate rulemaking process that evaluates the effectiveness and need for withdrawing the AHFDS deferral while accounting for the unique and diverse nature of airports and their operations.

Sincerely,

Michael E. France

Director, Regulatory Affairs

[1] Docket # EPA-HQ-UST–2011–0301-0191

[2] 76 Fed. Reg. at 71730

[3] http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/media/FAA_Economic_Impact_Rpt_2011.pdf

[4] http://www.transtats.bts.gov/data_elements.aspx?data=3

Click here for more information.

Request Your Member of Congress Sign a Support Letter to Repeal Fuel Fraud Provision in the Highway Bill

Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:22:00 GMT

Action Call

REQUEST YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS SIGN A SUPPORT LETTER TO REPEAL FUEL FRAUD PROVISION IN THE HIGHWAY BILL

April 17, 2012

What's at Issue
NATA is urging members to contact their Members of Congress in the U.S. House of Representatives immediately with a request to sign a letter in support of a provision in H.R. 7, the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act "the Highway Bill of 2012" that would repeal the "fuel fraud" provision.

Why It's Important
U.S. Representatives Sam Graves (R-MO) and John Barrow (D-GA), General Aviation Caucus Co-Chairmen, have sponsored a letter to Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI), and it is essential that we obtain as many signatures as possible.

What to Do
Contact your Members of Congress in the U.S. House of Representatives today. NATA's Legislative Action Center provides association members a quick, easy way to email a letter directly to their Members of Congress.

Status
H.R. 7 is scheduled to be on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives early next week.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

NATA Names Greenberg Business Management Committee Chair

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:50:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA NAMES GREENBERG BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHAIR

Alexandria, VA, April 11, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that Brett A. Greenberg, officer, director and executive management committee member, Galaxy Aviation, and president, Aura Jets, LLC, has been named the chairman of the NATA Business Management Committee. As chairman, Greenberg will coordinate with NATA staff and the association's membership in developing a strategic direction for the Business Management Committee. The committee was formed to develop programs and services that achieve both the committee's purpose and provide on-going oversight of NATA member-service programs.

In his current position, Greenberg's duties fall within the scope of general oversight of Galaxy Aviation's chain of FBOs. Greenberg has a Bachelor of Business Administration from Mercer University and Master of Business Administration from Georgia State University and is a private, instrument, multi-engine commercial pilot.

"We are very pleased to have Brett as chairman for the NATA Business Management Committee," said NATA Director of Membership and Business Development Daniel Gurley. "His vast experience in FBOs and the general aviation industry will bring a unique perspective for leading this committee."

More information on the NATA Business Management Committee is available by clicking here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Names Moylan As Environmental Committee Chair

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:20:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA NAMES MOYLAN AS ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE CHAIR

Alexandria, VA, April 6, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that Patrick Moylan, director of health, safety, environment and security for Signature Flight Support, has been named the chairman of the NATA Environmental Committee. As chairman, Moylan will coordinate with NATA staff and the association's membership in developing a strategic direction for the Environmental Committee. The committee was formed to monitor environmental issues affecting the association membership as well as develop programs that assist member companies in minimizing their impact on the environment.

In his current position, Moylan is responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable regulations and implementing Safety Management Systems across Signature's global network. Previously, he held positions in FBO and airline management, aviation education and air traffic control and as an aviation safety consultant for the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of System Safety. Moylan has a Bachelor of Arts and Master of Business Administration from Michigan State University, holds several safety and training certifications, and is an accredited auditor for the NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit Program.

"We are very pleased to have Patrick as chairman for the NATA Environmental Committee" said NATA Director of Regulatory Affairs Michael France. "His experience in practical environmental issues affecting aviation businesses makes him a perfect fit for leading this committee."

More information on the NATA Environmental Committee is available at www.nata.aero or by clicking here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATF Announces Scholarship Recipients

Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:19:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATF ANNOUNCES SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS

Alexandria, VA, April 4, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Foundation (NATF) is proud to announce the winners of its Dan L. Meisinger Sr. Memorial Learn to Fly Scholarship, Pioneers of Flight Scholarship and NATA Business Scholarship.

"NATA is dedicated to promoting general aviation careers with the many scholarships we offer. Through the NATF, we annually recognize aviation enthusiasts and encourage their development in the general aviation industry," said National Air Transportation Association (NATA) Director of Safety & Training Amy B. Koranda.

The 2011 Dan L. Meisinger Sr. Memorial Learn to Fly Scholarship has been awarded to Benjamin Cavin Skidmore, a sophomore at Hinds Community College in Raymond, MS. Benjamin is currently pursuing a dual degree in Aviation Maintenance and Technology and Commercial Aviation and hopes to complete his private pilot license training by the end of 2012. According to Benjamin, he doesn't want to be just a pilot; he wants to be a top-notch pilot who can also work on airplanes. The Dan L. Meisinger Sr. Memorial Learn to Fly Scholarship was established in the honor and memory of Dan L. Meisinger, Sr., founder of Executive Beechcraft, whose career in aviation spanned 63 years and who was twice named Beech Aircraft's Man of the Year. The Learn to Fly Scholarship is given annually to deserving college students enrolled in aviation programs to be used to pursue their academic goals.

The 2011 Pioneers of Flight Scholarship has been awarded to Pauline Marie Brothers, a junior at the Moody Bible Institute in Spokane, WA, and Celeste Diana Hadley, a sophomore at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, AZ. Pauline has just received her private pilot's license and is now learning to fly high performance, complex and tail wheel aircraft. Her future goal is to serve with a Mission Agency overseas/cross culturally as a pilot and mechanic delivering supplies and people into and performing medical evacuations out of small remote villages. Celeste is majoring in "Aeronautical Science with a specialty in Helicopter Flight" and is also planning on becoming a Certified Flight Instructor. She aspires to become a fire suppression aviator, eventually working for a local, state, or federal fire service agency as a helicopter pilot providing air support. The Pioneers of Flight Scholarship was established in 1989 to offer financial assistance and encouragement to young people in the pursuit of academic excellence to fulfill the NATF's ultimate goal of fostering and promoting careers in the aviation industry.

The 2011 NATA Business Scholarship has been awarded to Jodie D. Kaluza, currently employed at Sugar Land Regional Airport (SGR) / GlobalSelect as the airport services manager for SGR and marketing manager for the FBO. Jodie is currently enrolled at Embry Riddle Aeronautical University and is working towards her degree in Aviation Business Management with a minor in Airport Management. Her future goal is to gain her private pilot's license and become the next airport director at Sugar Land Regional Airport. The annual NATA Business Scholarship was established for the continuing education of employees of NATA member companies. The applicants' studies may be used to further their skills to work at an FBO, charter company, maintenance facility or flight school.

"This year we received more scholarship applications than previous years; it was very challenging for our judges. It is great to see so many bright and dedicated students in the aviation industry. This year's winners were indeed deserving of recognition, and we truly wish them the best of luck in pursuing their dreams," said NATA Manager of Safety 1st Programs Elizabeth Nicholson.

For more information on the NATF scholarship, click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Spring Training Week Scores Another Victory

Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:20:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Amy Koranda
Director, Safety & Training
800-808-6282
akoranda@nata.aero

NATA SPRING TRAINING WEEK SCORES ANOTHER VICTORY

Alexandria, VA, March 9, 2012 — The 2012 NATA Spring Training Week at the Cygnus Aviation Expo in Las Vegas started strong on March 5 with increased attendance. The 2012 Spring Training Week lineup included National Air Transportation Association's (NATA) Line Service Supervisor Training, Environmental Compliance, FBO Finance Fundamentals and Safety 1st Trainer seminars. From top-notch training and quality speakers to friendly competition and a fun locale, the 2012 NATA Spring Training Week had something for everyone.

NATA Director of Safety and Training Amy Koranda said, “We covered a lot of bases this year from supervisory and Safety 1st training to environmental compliance and FBO finance fundamentals. Through NATA’s annual events and extensive online programs, we strive to meet the educational and safety training needs of members from the front line to those who aspire to the executive suite.”

Each seminar featured knowledgeable speakers who came to share their unique expertise and industry experience. NATA’s renowned LSST offers a variety of technical, supervisory, coaching, mentoring, leadership skills by talented speakers. NATA’s Safety 1st Trainer gives participants many trainer tools and techniques to be better, happier trainers, not to mention the contented trainees that will result. Attendees from NATA’s FBO Finance Fundamentals seminar come out knowing how to talk intelligently in a management meeting and how to use the numbers in a financial statement to move the business forward. And last, but not least, NATA’s Environmental seminar will indeed ensure your compliance on the varying issues that require your company’s time and attention.

On the morning of March 8, NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne participated in a lively panel discussion at a Cygnus Aviation Expo session on best practices when it comes to negotiating leases between airports and their tenant companies.

"This event has been increasingly successful for NATA and our members and we plan to continue the Spring Training tradition well into the future," added Koranda.

To get participants in the spirit, NATA hosted a “Spring Training Week Prize Drawing” at the NATA registration desk. Congratulations go out to the following MVPs:
Carlos Rodriguez with Meridian in Teterboro, NJ
Shelley Cole with Minot Aero Center

For more information on NATA’s Spring Training Week and other seminars and events, visit www.nata.aero.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies
Click here for more information.

NATA Elects Four New Board Of Directors Members And Announces New Leadership

Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:44:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA ELECTS FOUR NEW BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERS AND ANNOUNCES NEW LEADERSHIP

Alexandria, VA, March 29, 2012 - Today at its annual membership meeting, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) announced the selection of James Sweeney, president of Fargo Jet Center, as chairman of the NATA Board of Directors and Marian H. Epps, chief financial officer of Epps Aviation, as treasurer effective immediately. Sweeney replaces Todd Duncan, chairman, Duncan Aviation, and Epps replaces Robert "Buddy" Stallings, president, Eastern Aviation Fuels, Inc.

"NATA greatly appreciates Todd Duncan's leadership as board chairman over the past year," said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "We now welcome Jim Sweeney as he takes over the reins in this year of change and opportunity for the association."

NATA also elected four new members to its board of directors: Gary Dempsey, president, flight services - The Americas, Jet Aviation Holdings USA, Inc.; Marty Hiller, executive vice president, business aviation, World Fuel Services; Robert Olislagers, executive director, Centennial Airport; and Steve Loyd, president and owner, Loyd's Aviation.

Gary Dempsey joined Jet Aviation in 2003 and was appointed president of Jet Aviation Holdings USA, Inc., in July 2006. Based in Teterboro, New Jersey, Dempsey oversees the daily operations of Jet Aviation's North American network of high-quality fueling bases, its aircraft management services, satellite line maintenance centers, air carrier charter division, South and Central American operations and aviation staffing company Jet Professionals.

Prior to this appointment, Dempsey held the position of senior vice president, aircraft maintenance and OEM development where he was responsible for growing the aircraft maintenance business within the North American Jet Aviation facilities. This involved managing relations with aircraft OEM companies and developing new agreements for the worldwide organization.

Dempsey has led some of the top-rated FBOs and service centers in the U.S. and is dedicated to serving the general aviation transportation industry. He graduated from Wilmington College, earning a Bachelor of Business Administration. He is a licensed A&P mechanic with FAA inspection authorization and is also a multi-engine pilot with instrument rating.

Marty Hiller is executive vice president, business aviation of World Fuel Services. From 1975 until 1982, the Hiller family operated coal-mining operations in eastern Kentucky. In 1983, Pacific Power and Light purchased and merged Hiller Fuels, Inc. into Nerco-Hiller Coal Company. The Hiller family operated this entity until 1985. The Hiller Group, Inc. was founded in 1985, and grew into one of the largest aviation fuel distributors in the United States. In 2011, World Fuel Services purchased The Hiller Group, Inc., with Hiller assuming management of domestic and global business aviation as executive vice president, business aviation.

Hiller is a member of the NATA Presidents Council, Presidents Council University of Notre Dame, and a member of the NBAA. He graduated from Trine State University, with a Bachelor of Arts in Marketing and a Minor in Finance.

Robert Olislagers has been the executive director and CEO of Centennial Airport in Denver, Colorado, since September 2000. He has been working in aviation for more than 25 years, serving as airport manager for a number of airports throughout California and New York.

He serves as a member of the board of directors for the International Association of Airport Executives, South East Business Partnership, HSS Security, Inc., and Developmental Pathways. He is a Lifetime Member of the Air Force Association. His notable honors include the Leadership Award from the American Association of Airport Executives, Airport Executive of the Year from SW Chapter of the American Association of Airport Executives, Airport Operator of the Year from N.O.I.S.E, among many others. Olislagers has written numerous publications on airport security, aviation and aviation history, airport noise, airport management, and airport land use issues, as well as one book on the history of airports.

Steve Loyd has been the president of Loyd's Aviation since 1986. He joined the company in 1973, working alongside his father, Byron Loyd, who established the company in 1958. Prior to joining the family business, Steve received his degree in Business from the California Polytechnic University at San Luis Obispo.

Loyd's Aviation, celebrating its 53rd anniversary, is the only full-service FBO on Meadows Field in Bakersfield, California. Loyd's started out of one hangar and now encompasses 33 acres of land and accommodates 90 aircraft. This growth led to the addition of many new businesses: fuel sales and line service, maintenance and parts, aircraft management, charter service, hangar and storage rental, and aircraft sales.

"The NATA Board of Directors comprises the finest leaders representing all areas of general aviation," said NATA's Coyne. "The association will benefit tremendously from the vast experience of Gary, Marty, Robert and Steve. We appreciate their support and commitment in joining the NATA Board of Directors."

Click here to view the full list of the NATA Board of Directors.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Capital Week For Aviation Business Huge Success

Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:28:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

CAPITAL WEEK FOR AVIATION BUSINESS HUGE SUCCESS

Alexandria, VA, March 30, 2012 — More than 200 National Air Transportation Association (NATA) members convened in Washington, D.C. for A Capital Week for Aviation Business events, including the association’s FBO Leadership Conference, new FBO Managers Workshop, Industry Excellence Awards dinner and presentation, Day on the Hill congressional visits, Annual Meeting of the Membership and Spring Committee Meetings.

The week’s events kicked off on Tuesday with a luncheon for the FBO Managers Workshop. This two-day event dealt with issues faced by the general manager running an FBO, and included an airport manager perspective on airport/FBO relations workshop, nationwide trends affecting FBOs and airport relationships workshop, communicating the value of aviation businesses and the communities they support workshop and a panel discussion led by GA Infrastructure and Investment Coalition Strategy CEOs.

The FBO Leadership Conference began Wednesday with a welcome lunch and keynote speech by Congressman John J. “Jimmy” Duncan, Jr. (R-TN). Congressman Duncan praised NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne’s leadership of the association and his efforts over the years on Capitol Hill. He also urged NATA’s members to promote the legislation he sponsored to reduce unfair government competition with the private sector, including small businesses.

One of the highlights of the FBO Leadership Conference was the announcement of the release of new best practice standards for airport leases with Aeronautical Service Providers. These best practices, developed in conjunction with Airports Council International – North America (ACI-NA), serve to facilitate long-term private investment in on-airport facilities. Click here to read the press release. The leadership conference also included a panel on the future of avgas, a leadership breakfast and oil company perspective session and an inspiring presentation by Disney Institute.

Wednesday evening, attendees toasted the industry's best at NATA's annual Industry Excellence Awards dinner and presentation. Click here to view a press release on the winners. Top honors went to Mary M. Miller, vice president, industry and government affairs, Signature Flight Support and BBA Aviation, and Kenneth C. Ricci, chairman of the board of Flight Options and chief executive officer of Nextant Aerospace.

On Thursday, NATA members blanketed Capitol Hill to promote the association’s legislative agenda. Nearly 100 NATA member company representatives met with more than 150 Members of Congress and staff to discuss a wide array of federal, state and local issues.

Day on the Hill talking points included:

A Capital Week for Aviation Business also included NATA's spring committee meetings as well as the annual member meeting in which four new members of the NATA Board of Directors were elected. Click here to view the press release of the appointment of Gary Dempsey, president, flight services – The Americas, Jet Aviation Holdings USA, Inc., Marty Hiller, executive vice president, business aviation, World Fuel Services, Robert Olislagers, executive director, Centennial Airport, and Steve Loyd, president and owner, Loyd’s Aviation.

“This week was replete with opportunities for our members to gain knowledge and information about the industry as well as to bring awareness of the vital importance of their business and general aviation to Capitol Hill,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “With the increased participation across all the week’s events, it truly was a capital week for aviation business.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

2012 NATA AMT Employer Recognition Award Winners Announced

Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:01:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

2012 NATA AMT Employer Recognition Award Winners Announced

Alexandria, VA, March 29, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association is pleased to announce the 2012 award winners in its Aviation Maintenance Technician (AMT) Employer Recognition Award Program. The AMT Employer Recognition Award Program acknowledges employers that share the association’s belief that high quality AMT training has a positive impact on aviation safety, employee morale and customer satisfaction and have demonstrated this belief by providing that training to their employees. The following companies have received either one, three or five star recognition in the program for their dedication to AMT training:

AirFlite	Central Flying Service, Inc. – Prop. Maint. Group	Honeywell Aerospace Flight Test Operations	NetJets Aviation - DXTA
AirResource Group	Duncan Aviation - Battle Creek	Intercontinental Jet Service Corporation	NetJets Sales - DXTR
Aitheras Aviation Group, LLC	Duncan Aviation - Lincoln	Jet Aviation Teterboro	Northrop Grumman Corporation
Banyan Air Service - Avionic Division	Duncan Aviation - Provo	Kansas City Aviation Center	Presidential Aviation, Inc.
Bombardier FlexJet	Executive Jet Management - Cincinnati	MassMutual Financial Group - Maintenance	Prior Aviation Services
Broadie's Aircraft	Executive Jet Management - White Plains	Mayo Aviation	SpiritJets, LLC
Business Jet Access	Flight Options, LLC	Million Air - Houston	Stevens Aviation, Inc. – Broomfield, Colorado
Central Flying Service, Inc. - Jet Maint. Group	Heritage Aviation	Million Air SLC	The Home Depot Aviation

The AMT Employer Recognition Program requires participates to provide and document a minimum level of training to employed AMTs. Status levels within the program provide one, three or five star awards depending on the percentage of employed AMTs meeting this threshold. This 2012 award recognizes a company’s efforts in calendar year 2011.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Names Mary Miller And Kenn Ricci Recipients Of Association's Top Honors

Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:15:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA NAMES MARY MILLER AND KENN RICCI RECIPIENTS OF ASSOCIATION’S TOP HONORS

Alexandria, VA, March 28, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) annually recognizes individuals, offices, and organizations demonstrating excellence in their field and the highest level of customer service. NATA's Industry Excellence Awards are given to exceptional individuals and organizations that have helped improve the general aviation community. This year's winners were honored during the NATA Industry Excellence Awards Dinner on March 28 at the Hyatt Regency in Washington, D.C. The dinner was held in conjunction with the association's FBO Leadership Conference, Day on the Hill, Annual Meeting and Election of Officers, and Spring Committee Meetings − collectively called NATA's A Capital Week for Aviation Business. Top honors went to Mary M. Miller, vice president, industry and government affairs, Signature Flight Support and BBA Aviation, as recipient of NATA’s Distinguished Service Award and Kenneth C. Ricci, chairman of the board of Flight Options and chief executive officer of Nextant Aerospace, as recipient of NATA’s William A. “Bill” Ong Memorial Award.

The William A. “Bill” Ong Memorial Award is named in honor and memory of the association’s co-founder and first president and is given for extraordinary achievement and extended meritorious service to the general aviation industry. The 2011 award recipient, Kenneth C. Ricci, founded Flight Options in 1998 and currently serves as its chairman. His marketing and strategic leadership took Flight Options from inception to annual sales of more than $600 million, operating more than 200 aircraft, in a period of four years. He is a principal at Directional Aviation Capital, which invests in and owns various aviation enterprises, including Flight Options, Nextant Aerospace, Sojourn Aviation and Constant Aviation. He is a 28-year aviation veteran and is among the industry’s most dynamic leaders.

In 2005, Ricci, as chief executive officer of Mercury Air Centers, realigned its operating divisions, deployed $245 million of invested capital and sold it to Macquarie Infrastructure Trust in 2007 in a deal valued at $615 million. He began his career in 1980 with the founding of Corporate Wings. Under his leadership, Corporate Wings was named to the Inc. 500. For nine consecutive years, Corporate Wings was included in the Weatherhead 100.

Ricci is a four-time recipient of the NEO success award for business growth. He was honored as an Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year in 2000 and has been named one the most influential people in aviation by Aviation International News. In 2010, Ricci received the Harvard Business School’s Dively Entrepreneurship Award.

NATA’s Distinguished Service Award is awarded to an individual or organization still active in general aviation on a regular, day-to-day basis and recognizes outstanding service and ongoing contributions to the industry. In a change from past years’ awards programs, Mary M. Miller was not named as the recipient until the evening of the awards presentation.

Miller began her aviation career at Butler Aviation in 1981 as a customer service manager at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). She was promoted in 1987 to director of customer service for the Butler Aviation network and later to director of sales and customer relations. When Butler and Page Avjet were merged to form Signature Flight Support, Miller was promoted to vice president of customer relations. In 2010, she was promoted to vice president industry and government affairs for both Signature Flight Support and parent company BBA Aviation.

Miller has played a pivotal role in the Transportation Security Administration’s DCA Access Standard Safety Protocol program (DASSP) for DCA and has assisted business and general aviation to utilize the 48 authorized daily operations at the airport. The airport was closed to general aviation following the September 11 attacks, and Ms. Miller was an integral part of the process to reopen the airport. She has also defined a process to assist operators in navigating the DASSP application process, which has increased traffic at the airport to numbers approaching the approved daily limit. Her efforts on Capitol Hill and with government agencies and officials have brought much needed positive attention to the integral role of business and general aviation in the economy of the United States and the world.

“We are thrilled to present these awards to two outstanding individuals within our industry,” stated NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “Both Kenn and Mary represent the very best of what the general aviation industry has to offer when it comes to innovation and customer service. NATA and its members congratulate them both on these prestigious honors and thank them for their tireless efforts in making the general aviation industry all that it is today.”

NATA released the names of the following Industry Excellence Award winners in a press release on March 21:

Ronald Donner, editor of Aircraft Maintenance Technology (AMT) magazine, received the Aviation Journalism Award that identifies a journalist, writer, or publication excelling in consumer education or editorial support that is beneficial to the FBO/Air Charter industry.
The Richmond Flight Standards District Office was the recipient of NATA's FAA Customer Service Excellence Award and was recognized as an FAA facility that has represented the highest degree of customer service and elevated the quality of interaction between the FAA and aircraft maintenance and repair facilities, Part 135 certificate holders, airport service organizations, and flight schools.
The ATP/NATA General Aviation Service Technician Award (sponsored by Aircraft Technical Publishers) acknowledges the exceptional performance of a licensed airframe and power plant mechanic or radio repairman who has practiced his or her craft for a period of 20 or more years. The award was given posthumously to John (Ray) Hartley for his long-time career at StandardAero and work as manager and chief inspector - QA inspection at StandardAero's facility at LAX.
David Edwards, Jr., president and CEO of Greenville-Spartanburg Airport, was this year's recipient of the NATA Airport Executive Partnership Award. The Airport Executive Partnership Award recognizes an airport manager for his or her outstanding efforts to foster relationships between aviation businesses and airport operators.
Joseph Gravalec and Robert Kintner, Jr., owners of Superior Flight School, received the Excellence In Pilot Training Award for their outstanding contributions in safety, professionalism, leadership, and excellence in the field of pilot training.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Educates Membership On Ground Breaking Agreement To Encourage Infrastructure Investment By FBO Industry

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:01:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA EDUCATES MEMBERSHIP ON GROUND BREAKING AGREEMENT TO ENCOURAGE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BY FBO INDUSTRY

Alexandria, VA, March 28, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) and the General Aviation Infrastructure and Investment Coalition (GAIIC) are pleased to announce the release of new best practice standards for airport leases with Aeronautical Service Providers. These best practices, developed in conjunction with Airports Council International – North America (ACI-NA), serve to facilitate long-term private investment in on-airport facilities.

The GAIIC was founded early last year by a number of leading FBO companies to assist the general aviation community in driving private on-airport investment and job creation. The chief objective of the coalition was to address the factors inhibiting private investment in general aviation facilities. At some airports, short-term leases may prohibit FBOs from taking advantage of normal commercial tax rules and lending practices regarding depreciation and amortization that would otherwise act to incentivize investment and economic growth.

“On behalf of the more than 250 FBOs operated by more than 27 owners represented by the GAIIC, I want to thank both ACI and NATA for working towards a best practices document that did not require a legislated mandate for lease term,” said Sam Whitethorn, executive vice president, McBee Strategic Consulting. McBee Strategic Consulting represented the GAIIC in the negotiations with ACI, NATA and others. “The best practices guidance for long-term infrastructure investment provides a consistent framework for private industry to work with local municipalities to develop general aviation infrastructure,” Whitehorn explained.

According to the best practices agreement, the following points allow the needs of both the Airport Sponsor and the Aeronautical Service Provider (ASP) to be met:

The length of lease terms and other lease provisions should remain a business transaction between the ASP and the Airport Sponsor;
Amortization schedules that are based on the amount of the airport infrastructure investment, typical commercial amortization and depreciation practices for similar airport development projects, and the particular market environment will allow ASPs greater access to financing and the ability to generate a return on capital expenditure;
A short lease term negatively impacts the capacity to amortize large investments and the ability to obtain financing for projects and develop a sufficient return on capital; and
If the term of the lease is shorter than the mutually agreed-to amortization schedule, the lease should include a “buy out” of the unamortized capital investment made by the incumbent ASP at the end of the specified term.

“NATA applauds the cooperative efforts of the GAIIC and ACI-NA that resulted in these best practices,” stated NATA Vice President of Government & Industry Affairs Eric R. Byer. “This process proved the value of open communication between industry stakeholders. These best practices recognize the unique relationship that the FBOs have with our nation’s airports and the value of the private investments made by FBOs in on-airport facilities. NATA believes that airport sponsors and FBOs are great partners in making airports economic drivers for local communities and our nation.”

To read the GAIIC summary of the best practices agreement with the airport community, please click here.

To read the best practices agreement in its entirety, please click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Announces Industry Excellence Award Recipients To Be Honored March 28

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:17:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA ANNOUNCES INDUSTRY EXCELLENCE AWARD RECIPIENTS TO BE HONORED MARCH 28

Alexandria, VA, March 21, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) annually recognizes individuals, offices, and organizations demonstrating excellence in their field and the highest level of customer service. NATA's Industry Excellence Awards are given to exceptional individuals and organizations that have helped improve the general aviation community. This year's winners will be honored during the NATA Industry Excellence Awards Dinner on March 28 at the Hyatt Regency in Washington, D.C. The dinner will be held in conjunction with the association's FBO Leadership Conference, Day on the Hill, Annual Meeting and Election of Officers, and Spring Committee Meetings - collectively called NATA's A Capital Week for Aviation Business.

"This year's presentation holds a few surprises, namely the winners of the association's two highest honors, the William A. "Bill" Ong Memorial Award and the NATA Award for Distinguished Service," said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "The award winners may now be a secret, but once they have been named, no one will be surprised that these two well respected and highly admired individuals in our industry are being honored."

NATA will also present five awards to the following recipients:

Ronald Donner, editor of Aircraft Maintenance Technology (AMT) magazine, will receive the Aviation Journalism Award that identifies a journalist, writer, or publication excelling in consumer education or editorial support that is beneficial to the FBO/Air Charter industry. After working in aviation, in particular aircraft maintenance for more than 35 years, Donner now successfully uses his vast aviation experience to relate closely to the aircraft maintenance community and AMT readership. In the two years under Donner's editorial leadership, AMT has expanded editorial content to include aircraft maintenance topics in all segments of aviation: airline, business aviation, helicopters, and military aviation; yet has maintained regular focus on general aviation maintenance. His proudest achievement has been the successful introduction of the popular "MRO Operations" feature in AMT, which highlights the expanding FAR Part 145 repair station maintenance activity, in all aviation segments including general and business aviation.

The Richmond Flight Standards District Office will be the recipient of NATA's FAA Customer Service Excellence Award and will be recognized as an FAA facility that has represented the highest degree of customer service and elevated the quality of interaction between the FAA and aircraft maintenance and repair facilities, Part 135 certificate holders, airport service organizations, and flight schools. They were nominated for their dedication and swiftness in working with Orion Air Group during its establishment of Tempus Jet Centers and the company's Part 145 certification process. Darren A. American, principal maintenance inspector, and his certification team, Principal Avionics Inspector Dale Herner and Aviation Safety Inspector Elizabeth Davidson, were named in the nomination as having demonstrated the highest degree of professionalism by providing assistance above and beyond what is required in the performance of their duties as aviation safety inspectors.

The ATP/NATA General Aviation Service Technician Award (sponsored by Aircraft Technical Publishers) acknowledges the exceptional performance of a licensed airframe and power plant mechanic or radio repairman who has practiced his or her craft for a period of 20 or more years. The award will be given posthumously to John (Ray) Hartley for his long-time career at StandardAero and work as manager and chief inspector - QA inspection at StandardAero's facility at LAX. Hartley's talents, knowledge and experience as well as his enthusiasm, commitment to the industry and willingness to lend a hand are but just a few of the attributes that qualify him for this honor. His family and colleagues will be on hand to celebrate Hartley's professionalism, knowledge, humor, kindness, and friendship.

David Edwards, Jr., president and CEO of Greenville-Spartanburg Airport, is this year's recipient of the NATA Airport Executive Partnership Award. The Airport Executive Partnership Award recognizes an airport manager for his or her outstanding efforts to foster relationships between aviation businesses and airport operators. Recipients of the award must illustrate leadership in the "partnership" between airport operators and airport tenants. With more than 20 years of airport management experience, Edwards has strong credentials in the areas of business development, properties, government affairs, operations and international marketing. He has been an instrumental player in working with the General Aviation Infrastructure Investment Coalition (GAIIC), a group formed by FBOs to increase positive economic growth in long-term investments at airports by encouraging private sector investments. Direct results of this growth will be upgraded facilities, job creation, and essential services to the aviation community.

Joseph Gravalec and Robert Kintner, Jr., owners of Superior Flight School, will receive the Excellence In Pilot Training Award for their outstanding contributions in safety, professionalism, leadership, and excellence in the field of pilot training. Gravalec and Kintner have helped countless new pilots understand the meaning of being a professional pilot, regardless of whether their goal was to pursue a career as a professional pilot, use the flying skills as a tool for their business or just use the skills for a recreational hobby. They teach their students and renters how to have fun with their new skill as well as the importance of always looking for ways to improve. Superior Flight School is described by many as a well-managed organization with a knowledgeable staff connected and responsive to the needs of their clients.

"We look forward to honoring the best in the industry and ask that you join us," added Coyne. "The awards dinner and presentation is included in day one of the FBO Leadership Conference, but tickets are also available separately for those only able to attend the evening's festivities."

Contact Elizabeth Nicholson at enicholson@nata.aero for more information on NATA's Industry Excellence Awards Dinner and Presentation and to secure tickets.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA's Workers' Compensation Insurance Program Exceeds $80 Million Returned to Participating Members

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:03:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA'S WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE PROGRAM EXCEEDS
$80 MILLION RETURNED TO PARTICIPATING MEMBERS

Alexandria, VA, March 20, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that the NATA/USAIG Workers' Compensation Program continues its strong presence within the marketplace by recently topping $80 million in good experience returns to its members.

Since its inception, the program has annually distributed a good experience return to participating members. Historically, program participants have received returns equal to or often greater than their annual NATA membership dues. The number of participants has continued to grow - from 76 original members in 1975 to more than 800 in 2012.

The NATA/USAIG Workers' Compensation Program was created with three specific goals in mind:

Provide NATA members with a dependable long-term market for Workers' Compensation Insurance;
Structure the program in such a way that, if the overall loss experience of the participating members is favorable, participants would share in the return of a portion of the premium at the end of the policy year (good experience return); and
Make joining the program as easy as possible.

Today, after 37 years of continuous operation, the program has attained or exceeded every goal established by its founders. The NATA program is not only the strongest Workers Compensation Insurance plan on the market after 37 years, it is also one of NATA's most valuable member benefits.

Here is what some members have said about the program:

"Fostaire Helicopters has enjoyed the benefits of the NATA/USAIG Workers' Compensation Program for decades. We have seen the market tighten up after years of elevated losses, and open up when insureds' losses are at lower levels. We have found the rates always to be competitive, of course, USAIG is one of the premier global underwriters of aviation risks," said Fostaire Helicopters President Clarke Thomas.

"At our three Indiana locations, Montgomery Aviation Inc is a proud partner with the NATA/USAIG Workers Compensation Program. As an independent FBO, we can be challenged to find the solid coverage we need at a price we can afford, and the added benefit is we know that the percentage contribution to NATA is being used for all of us who care and work for the benefit of general aviation across the United States," said Montgomery Aviation Inc Owner and Vice President Andrea Montgomery. "It is a good program and we will continue to support the program for our future."

"Airgo has consistently been a participant of the NATA/USAIG Workers' Compensation Program since 1977," said Airgo Inc President Leslie Erb. "We find that the program serves our needs and supplies us with a level of coverage we would not be able to obtain on our own. Airgo appreciates the efforts of NATA to create a program like this for its members. I have found the Workers' Compensation Program to be one of NATA's more valuable benefits."

Contact your insurance broker and ask him or her to look into the NATA/USAIG Workers' Compensation Program. Make sure to take advantage of all of the benefits that NATA membership has to offer. A full list of benefits can be viewed at www.nata.aero.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Defeat Amendment To Highway Bill Seeking To Limit Air Tour Operations Over National Parks

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:33:00 GMT

ACTION CALL

DEFEAT AMENDMENT TO HIGHWAY BILL SEEKING TO LIMIT AIR TOUR OPERATIONS OVER NATIONAL PARKS

March 12, 2012

What’s at Issue
U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) has offered an amendment to S. 1813, the highway bill, which will likely further limit helicopter tours over national parks. The amendment is scheduled for a vote on Tuesday, March 13, 2012.

Why It’s Important
Alexander amendment #1779 would significantly affect air tour operators conducting commercial air tours over national parks by giving the National Park Service (NPS) sole authority to authorize, limit or eliminate air tours. Today, the NPS and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are equal partners in the process for establishing air tour management plans over national parks. This amendment would make the FAA subordinate to the NPS, thus upsetting the intentional balance between the interests of the environmental community and the air tour operators.

What to Do
Contact your U.S. Senators today or tomorrow morning in opposition to Alexander Amendment #1779. The Senate is scheduled to vote on the amendment tomorrow, March 13. NATA’s Legislative Action Center provides association members a quick, easy way to contact your Senators.

NATA Position
NATA is concerned and disappointed that Senator Alexander offered the amendment without any consultation with air tour operators. The amendment marginalizes the role of the FAA in air tour operations over national parks and tribal lands. If the amendment passes, it could mean the loss of hundreds of jobs and tens of millions of dollars in revenues. It will also limit access for visitors to our national parks, especially the elderly and the disabled.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

Click here to view as pdf.

Click here for more information.

Lawsuit Against EPA On Aircraft Lead Emissions Fails To Consider Actions Already Underway

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:45:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

LAWSUIT AGAINST EPA ON AIRCRAFT LEAD EMISSIONS FAILS TO CONSIDER ACTIONS ALREADY UNDERWAY

Alexandria, VA, March 12, 2012 — Members of the General Aviation (GA) Avgas Coalition say that a lawsuit filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the environmental group Friends of the Earth (FOE) over piston-engine aircraft’s use of leaded aviation gasoline (avgas) is not taking into consideration the considerable work already completed toward the development and deployment of an unleaded fuel solution.

The FOE lawsuit alleges that the EPA has unreasonably delayed its response to a 2006 petition asking the agency to make an endangerment finding and propose standards for lead emissions of aircraft. If successful, the lawsuit will force the EPA’s process for a potential endangerment finding onto a court-ordered timeline.

GA groups deeply involved in mapping out the transition to an unleaded fuel pointed to multiple actions the EPA has already taken, in conjunction with industry, to assess and minimize the impact of leaded avgas as it moves to an unleaded alternative.

Since the FOE’s 2006 petition was filed, the EPA has issued new rules that increase the stringency of the national ambient air quality standards for lead by tenfold. The new EPA rules also mandate monitoring of lead measurements near selected sources, even though the vast majority of areas with general aviation airports do not exceed the new stringent air quality standards for lead.

Additionally, at the urging of the GA Avgas Coalition, the EPA has been an active participant in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee. That committee is charged with producing recommendations to further the development and deployment of unleaded avgas. In 2010, the EPA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking, acknowledging the need to collect more information about the issue and asking for input from the public and industry.

The GA Avgas Coalition points out that ultimately the FAA, not the EPA, has final regulatory authority over all changes in aviation fuel due to critical safety of flight considerations. Although the EPA is charged with establishing aircraft emissions standards, it must consult with the FAA and cannot establish standards that would adversely affect safety. If the EPA does set new lead emissions standards for aircraft, the FAA would have responsibility for implementation and would have to explore the establishment of new fuel specifications.

The coalition maintains that the EPA’s efforts represent a reasonable approach to a multi-faceted problem. The agency’s actions thus far have already led to significant decreases in lead emissions – as much as 93 percent since 1980, according to the EPA’s data.

“Despite the lawsuit, the near-term availability of leaded aviation fuel is not threatened in any way,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “Members of industry, along with the FAA and EPA, will continue our diligent efforts toward a high-octane unleaded alternative to leaded avgas, with safety of flight as our foremost consideration.”

The aviation associations of the GA Avgas Coalition include the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, Experimental Aircraft Association, General Aviation Manufacturers Association, National Air Transportation Association, and the National Business Aviation Association.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Change is in the wind!

Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:40:00 GMT

To all NATA members….

As strong weather fronts sweep across the country this week, it is a good time to remember that in our business change is always just around the corner. Today, change is in the wind here at NATA.

The NATA Board of Directors and I have decided that 2012 will be my last year as president of NATA. Since 1994, it has been my honor to represent you here in Washington and in various public forums across the country. This job hasn’t always been easy, but together with an outstanding NATA staff we’ve been a consistent proponent for the interests of aviation businesses like yours.

I will continue to lead your association until January 1, 2013, when someone new will move into the NATA cockpit. Until then, I will support the board in the transition process and work to hand over to the new pilot of NATA an airworthy association, prepared for the challenges that our industry will face in 2013 and beyond. I’m sure that he or she will take NATA to new heights and continue our long tradition of being the voice of aviation business – strong, articulate, and undaunted.

As I told the NATA board and staff last week, pilots always have various waypoints in their flight plans and this upcoming waypoint is something that we all knew I would eventually reach. For Holly and me, it will mean a chance to refuel, change our heading a bit, and perhaps even move to a different flight level, but I sincerely hope that my association with you and thousands of other NATA members will continue, though in a different form or venue.

Long before I came to Washington as a freshman congressman in 1980, I was an aviation advocate. For nearly 40 years, I’ve been flying into FBOs, getting to know many NATA members even before I knew what NATA was. Now after visits to more than a thousand FBOs, repair stations, flight schools, charter operators, and airline services companies around the world, I continue to be amazed by the outstanding class of citizens who run businesses like yours. Meeting these men and women, whom I call the backbone of our national air transportation system, has been something that Holly and I will cherish forever.

When I was just a little tyke, my grandfather gave me the nickname “small change,” while tossing me a dime to remind me eponymously of our common surname. Looking back over these eighteen years, there are many changes at NATA and across the landscape of our industry, some small but some rather big, that give me great satisfaction, even if my role was only as a catalyst to help good ideas flourish. But it is your support of NATA and these various initiatives, from our Safety 1st training revolution to the good work of the Air Charter Safety Foundation to the continuing growth of our Workers’ Compensation Program to the scores of legislative and regulatory recommendations that became official policy or programs that insured that these ideas became a reality. Your continued support of NATA and our new leadership team means that our future flight plan will help us overcome the headwinds that lie ahead with the same energy, expertise, and enthusiasm that NATA has always had.

In closing, let me invite you to attend one of the many scheduled NATA events this year, if only to give Holly and me a chance to express personally our gratitude for your support and friendship over the past eighteen years. You have helped build the finest transportation system the world has ever known, and I know that NATA’s future will be even bigger and brighter. The winds are always changing – but for you, me, and every other NATA member, that change means opportunity.

Sincerely,

James K. Coyne

Click here for more information.

FAA Issues Proposed Rule Affecting Airline Transport Pilot Certificates And Training

Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:52:00 GMT

FAA ISSUES PROPOSED RULE AFFECTING AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOT CERTIFICATES AND TRAINING

March 5, 2012

What’s at Issue
Yesterday, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) titled Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations.

Why It’s Important
This proposed rule would amend federal regulations to increase the certification and experience requirements for eligibility to act as second-in-command (SIC) in Part 121 operations. This proposed rule also includes significant changes in the training that is required for issuance of an Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate. This rule change will dramatically alter the current training path and practices for all individuals seeking to obtain an ATP.

Major Provisions
New Requirements for Part 121 SICs
As required by the Airline Safety & FAA Extension Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-216), the FAA is proposing that all airline pilots hold an ATP certificate. Currently, serving as a SIC in Part 121 requires a commercial pilot certificate. The FAA is also proposing that all pilots operating in a Part 121 environment must hold a type rating (if the aircraft requires a type rating) for the type of aircraft flown. Currently, only the PIC would be required to hold a type rating.

Changes to the Experience and Training Requirements for ATP issuances
The FAA also has proposed significant changes to the experience and training necessary to obtain an ATP. These changes will impact any pilot seeking to obtain an ATP certificate.

Proposed requirement for a minimum of 50 hours of multi-engine experience for ATP/ multi-engine applicants
Establishment of a new ATP Certification Training program that would require pilots seeking an ATP rating to complete significant classroom and simulator training on topics relating to air carrier operations and transport category aircraft operations. This requirement is placed upon the student pilot, not necessarily the Part 121 or Part 135 operators. The proposed rule would allow Part 121 and 135 operators to reduce the amount of training they provide based upon the students’ prior completion of this program. Likewise, if a Part 135 carrier is upgrading an SIC to PIC (where the PIC position requires an ATP) the certification training program hours could reduce the hours of training otherwise required. Importantly, the FAA is mandating that this training be conducted in a flight simulator. No provisions for conducting this training in an aircraft are included.
Creation of a “restricted privileges ATP certificate.” Under this proposal, former military pilots and graduates of a four-year baccalaureate program with an affiliated Part 141 flight training program would be eligible to receive a restricted privileges ATP certificate with only 750 and 1000 hours total time respectively. The holder of a restricted privileges ATP certificate would be eligible to serve as an SIC in a Part 121 environment. Such a pilot would need to meet the standard ATP eligibility requirements prior to serving as a PIC (where an ATP is required for the operation/aircraft).

NATA Position
NATA understands that the FAA is under a statutory mandate to require ATP certification for all airline pilots; however, we strongly question the rationale and impact of requiring prospective pilots seeking an ATP certificate to shoulder the cost of both new and existing training requirements themselves. This shifting of the burden for providing airline and transport category specific training from the operator to the student pilot will have little positive impact and will reduce the overall supply of new airline pilots. NATA will fully evaluate this rulemaking and submit formal comments to the FAA.

Status
This notice of proposed rulemaking is open for public comment until April 30, 2012.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

Click to view as pdf.

Click here for more information.

Special Notice to Members

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:19:00 GMT

Alexandria, VA, February 29, 2012 - The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) issues the following Special Notice today.

Following the FBO Leadership Conference, and in accordance with Article VI, Section 3 of the NATA Bylaws, NATA will hold an election of officers at 11:30 a.m. on March 29, 2012, in Congressional Room A of the Washington Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill. The election is open to all NATA regular member company representatives.

The purpose of the meeting is for the election of association directors and for other issues to come before the members. The NATA Board of Directors, acting as a nominating committee of the whole, nominates as directors of NATA:

Gary L. Dempsey

President

Jet Aviation

         Teterboro, NJ

         Steven L. Loyd
         President
         Bakersfield Jet Center by Loyd's Aviation
         Bakersfield, CA

         Martin H. Hiller
         Executive Vice President - Business Aviation
         World Fuel Services
         Tampa, FL

         Robert Olislagers
         Executive Director
         Centennial Airport
         Englewood, CO

Members may submit other names for nomination by writing to President, NATA, 4226 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22302.

###

THICE OF AVIATION BUSINESS
NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.
Click here for more information.

NATA Comments to FAA on Clarification of Policy Regarding Approved Training Programs

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:16:00 GMT

February 27, 2012

Docket Operations, M-30
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor
Washington, DC 20590-0001

Delivered electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket No. FAA-2011-1397, Clarification of Policy Regarding Approved Training Programs

We commend the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for issuing this guidance in a draft format and accepting comments. Overall, while NATA believes that the proposed notice provides much needed clarity and is a good step toward ensuring consistency for training and evaluation of newly hired crewmembers at Part 135 on-demand operators, there are areas where further information and guidance is necessary.

Recognition of Prior Approval

The key issue the draft notice addresses is the appropriateness of training programs that include the ability for an air carrier hiring a new pilot to obtain "credit" for prior training and/or evaluations conducted by a different Part 135 certificate holder, thereby reducing the training and evaluations that must be conducted by the hiring carrier prior to placing a pilot into service. The agency establishes that provisions permitting such credit are contrary to the regulatory requirements. NATA appreciates that the FAA acknowledges that, despite the fact that programs providing for a transfer or credit for prior training and checking are now deemed inconsistent with current training program policy, numerous FAA Principal Operations Inspectors (POI) have authorized programs with these elements for hundreds of operators.

Timeline

The efforts and timeline described in the notice to rectify the situation appear to be reasonable. Specifically, following a POI’s review of an operator’s program if the POI determines revisions are necessary, the FAA intends to permit operators up to 12 months to revise and re-submit the training programs for approval. NATA believes this is a fair amount of time for operators to respond.

Retraining Not Required

NATA appreciates the FAA affirmatively stating that retraining of affected crewmembers is not generally required. Given that the training programs now in question were specifically approved by inspectors nationwide and were used for the training of hundreds or perhaps thousands of pilots, many of who have subsequently received other training (e.g. recurrent) with the certificate holder, it would be inappropriate to call into question their legal status as crewmembers.

Planned v. Programmed

Another point of emphasis in the draft notice is the distinction between "planned" and "programmed" hours. NATA believes the reiteration that Part 135 training programs are based upon planned hours (not the Part 121 fixed "programmed" hours standard) is key to understanding the flexibility not only for the reduced hour training program outlined by the agency notice, but is also an important point for inspectors and Part 135 operators in general. Operators often have reported to NATA that their POI is demanding certain minimum hours of training be completed. As stated in the notice, the Part 135 training standard is that the proficiency and knowledge of a crewmember is certified (by the instructor/supervisor/check airman) upon completion of the required training or evaluation.

Reduced Hour Training Curriculum

The Reduced Training Hour Curriculum (RTHC) articulated in the notice is an important element for the industry and, while other guidance has alluded to the potential for such programs, having this ability specifically articulated is welcome. In developing a reduced training hour program, NATA believes it will benefit both industry and inspectors for there to be a clear understanding of what potential maximum reduction in training hours could be achieved, given the appropriate entry prerequisites.

NATA believes that the minimum baseline for a new hire crewmember should be defined within the guidance to ensure that approval of RTHCs is consistent nationwide. It would be a disservice to the industry for operators to devote the time and resources to creating a RTHC consistent with programs approved for similar carriers only to have their POI reject the program over a personal belief that the reduction is "too much." A lack of a clear maximum reduction policy could easily lead the agency and industry to the point we are at now – inconsistent application of training program requirements that necessitates yet another national level review and new guidance.

NATA suggests that for a well-qualified crewmember (e.g., current and qualified in the aircraft, in the duty position desired, with current comparable Part 135 experience) the RTHC would include training in all the certificate holder-specific modules (i.e., basic indoctrination, HAZMAT, etc.) all written tests and performance of the required evaluation/checks, but that additional hours of instruction (ground or flight) would not be a required element for the RTHC. In the event of a failure of a test/evaluation the operator’s existing program requirements for requalification would be followed.

Further, NATA recommends that the FAA indicate that there is no maximum number of RTHCs that an operator could have approved. NATA anticipates that many operators may have three to four RTHC’s. To ensure this is clear and to help POIs anticipate potential programs they may be asked to approve, NATA suggests that the FAA include a list of "possible" curriculums that an operator may submit. This list could include, among other examples:

1. New crewmember with previous Part 135/Part 91K experience in the same duty position, without previous aircraft experience

2. New crewmember without previous Part 135/Part 91K experience, with previous experience in the aircraft to which the crewmember will be assigned

3. New crewmember with previous Part 135/91K experience, without previous experience in the aircraft to which the crewmember will be assigned.

For the purposes of establishing eligibility prerequisites for entry to a particular RTHC, NATA believes that the similarities in operational regulations between Part 135 and Part 91K are sufficient to allow either to serve as suitable experience for entry to an RTHC and requests that the FAA so state in the final notice.

Gap Analysis Based Option

NATA also recommends that the FAA include provisions for a "gap analysis"-based program for operators. A letter to a Part 135 operator dated January 28, 2010, and signed by Director, Flight Standards Service John Allen, states that a side-by-side comparison between two programs, could allow for some prior training to be accepted by a new employer.

Under certain controlled conditions we do, however, believe that some training, specifically systems training … may be creditable.

For one operator to accept the training conducted under another operator’s approved curriculum, without first conducting a side-by-side comparison designed to identify the differences between curriculums, is not consistent with sound operating practices.

The statements in that letter, attached herewith, establish that, in circumstances where a true side-by-side gap analysis can occur, indeed there could be additional leeway granted to the hiring carrier with regard to what specific training, testing and evaluations are required for a new hire pilot.

If a current or prior carrier provides its training program to the hiring carrier, a gap analysis could be performed that would permit the meaningful comparison described in Mr. Allen’s letter to occur. In such a program, the necessary differences training could be determined and provided to the crewmember. The hiring air carrier would still need to complete the required training that is not eligible for reduction as well as flight evaluations/checks with the crewmember.

One of the biggest potential economic impacts posed by this action is on the so-called contract pilot who may work for multiple air carriers on an ad hoc basis. Utilization of a contract pilot by a Part 135 operator requires substantial coordination with other carriers for whom the pilot works to ensure compliance with numerous regulations, such as total commercial flight hour limits among others. In these work arrangements, the carriers are already engaged in communications, and it is not unreasonable to believe that they would be willing to share their training programs with each other to ensure that the contract pilot is properly training and able to continue working for each operator. The benefit of such a program was acknowledged by Mr. Allen in his 2010 letter and should be incorporated into the final notice. This approach to analyzing training between operators could, and should, also be extended to other training events (i.e., recurrent) to continue to permit what has been a successful and safe employment choice for some pilots.

Negative Consequence Possible

An area of concern for NATA is that the FAA may not have fully considered a significant, and likely unintended, consequence of the training program changes required by the notice. From a regulatory standpoint, simulator-based training for Part 135 is optional. It is highly likely that some number of operators will conduct training and/or evaluations in the aircraft rather than in a simulator as a result of this FAA notice. For economic reasons or because a training center may not elect to provide a particular service, there may well be some movement away from simulator-based training and checking. This would be unfortunate and certainly not the agency’s goal.

The value of simulation-based training is well-known and the FAA must use caution as it proceeds in this area. Part 135 pilots will likely work for several air carriers, far more than their Part 121 counterparts, during their career. This movement within the industry means that a Part 135 pilot will be subject to many initial new hire training courses, theoretically all but the first reduced in some way, but nonetheless multiple training events will occur where prior to this notice some credit for prior experience may have been awarded. The potential economic impact on operators is significant, and for some operators in certain hiring situations it may make more sense to provide all the training "in house" using the aircraft, forgoing simulation altogether until perhaps the pilot is due for recurrent. NATA urges caution and careful consideration when the FAA imposes new mandates on the industry that could have the consequence of driving operators away from simulation for training and checking events.

The relationship between operator, POI, training centers and their TCPMs is elaborate and at times unnecessarily burdensome for all involved. In 2011, NATA participated in an FAA-chartered Aviation Rulemaking Committee that recommended the FAA review the relationship between Part 135 carriers and the Part 142 training centers. NATA reiterates its support of that recommendation and encourages the FAA to dedicate the resources necessary to pursue a meaningful review, with industry participation, that would allow for improvement of these complex relationships while enhancing the training ultimately provided to crewmembers.

Sincerely,
Jacqueline E. Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs

1. The Flightcrew Member Training Hours Requirement Review ARC submitted its final recommendations to the FAA in May 2011

Click here to view as a pdf.

Click here for more information.

NATA Raises Funds For Combat Wounded

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:41:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA RAISES FUNDS FOR COMBAT WOUNDED

Alexandria, VA, January 11, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) has partnered once again with the Veterans Airlift Command (VAC) to raise funds for their mission supporting our combat wounded. The VAC is a charitable organization that provides free air transportation to wounded warriors, veterans, and their families for medical and other compassionate purposes. NATA and VAC established a special fund last year, NATA Wings for Warriors, for NATA members and friends to contribute to the organization. This year, NATA’s support of VAC has been expanded throughout all of the association’s major 2012 events.

VAC was founded by retired U.S. Army helicopter pilot Walt Fricke, who grew the VAC mission from a single volunteer aircraft owner and pilot, himself, into a national network consisting of over 1700 volunteer aircraft owners and pilots.

When wounded warriors return from the battlefield, they are often in need of ongoing medical treatment far from their homes, loved ones, and comrades. VAC coordinates the transportation of wounded veterans and their families all over the country, utilizing a network of volunteer aircraft owners and pilots who have generously donated their time and equipment to support the activities of the VAC. In fact, these flights are now recognized under the official Federal Aviation Administration call sign “Hero Flight,” which air traffic control grants priority handling whenever possible.

“The VAC is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization,” said VAC CEO and Founder Walt Fricke. “Donations are absolutely crucial to maintaining our national network of pilots and aircraft owners, in order to facilitate their missions. And, with our target of doubling the size of our turbine/jet volunteer fleet over the next 18 months, we look forward to partnering with organizations such as NATA to help us in accomplishing this vital goal,”

What can you do to help?

Make a personal or corporate contribution to the NATA Wings for Warriors fund by visiting http://www.veteransairlift.org/m/donate.aspx?campaign=NATAWFW2012
Share the VAC mission with fractional share owners and card program members. Ask them to donate unused flight hours to the VAC.
Give a corporate gift of flight hours to the VAC.

“We are honored to bring awareness to the Veterans Airlift Command and its important mission,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “We encourage our members to consider not only making financial donations, but also offering aircraft and pilots for VAC flights; even a few hours a year would be a gracious contribution to VAC.”

VAC will also have a booth at the NATA FBO Leadership Conference to be held March 28-29 in Washington, D.C. and the NATA Air Charter Summit to be held June 11-13 in Dulles, VA. Visit www.nata.aero/events for more information on these events.

Visit http://www.veteransairlift.blogspot.com/ for the latest news on the VAC and to read stories from veterans and their families regarding the critical work of the VAC.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

President Unveils His Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Request

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:15:00 GMT

Untitled Document

LEGISLATIVE REPORT

PRESIDENT UNVEILS HIS FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET REQUEST

February 20, 2012

What’s at Issue
On February 13, 2012, President Obama released his $3.8 trillion dullar federal budget proposal for fiscal year 2013 (FY13).

Why It’s Important
The budget plan includes a $100-per flight user fee on aviation and reduces the bonus depreciation schedule for general aviation aircraft from five to seven years, to align with the depreciation schedule for commercial aircraft.

Major Provisions
Revenue Raising Provisions:

User Fee: The President proposes to impose a $100-per-flight user fee, payable to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), on aviation operators who fly in contrulled airspace. All piston aircraft, military aircraft, public aircraft, air ambulances, aircraft operating outside of contrulled airspace, and Canada-to-Canada flights would be exempted. The administration estimates this fee would generate an estimated $7.4 billion over 10 years and this revenue would finance roughly three-fourths of airport investments and air traffic contrul system costs.

Eliminate Special Depreciation Rules for Purchases of Aircraft: Reduces the depreciation schedule of general aviation aircraft from five years to seven year, to match the depreciation schedule of commercial aircraft. The administration claims this provision would reduce the deficit by $2 billion over 10 years.

Department of Transportation:

President Obama has requested $74 billion for the U.S. Department of Transportation for FY13, a $1.4 billion increase from the amount Congress appropriated for 2012. In addition, the President has requested another $50 billion to be obligated to transportation projects in the current fiscal year. Of the $50 billion proposed, $2 billion would be directed to the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and $1 billion for FAA’s facilities and equipment account.

National Infrastructure Bank: Once again, President Obama has called for the creation of an independent, non-partisan National Infrastructure Bank (NIB), led by infrastructure and financial experts to issue loans and loan guarantees to eligible projects. Loans issued by the NIB could be extended up to 35 years, giving the NIB the ability to be a partner with state, local, and private co-investors. To maximize leverage from federal investments, the NIB would finance no more than 50 percent of the total cost of any project.

Federal Aviation Administration:

The President provides $15.172 billion for the FAA, a $728 million decrease in funding for the agency over the 2012 enacted level of $15.9 billion. This reduction is due to a proposed cut to AIP grants for large and medium hub airports. The administration proposes to offset this cut by asking Congress to grant these airports the authority to increase Passenger Facility Charges to pay for new airport projects.

The FAA Operations, Facilities and Equipment, and Research and Development accounts received a slight increase, $1 billion in additional funding for NextGen, which is $99 million more than was appropriated for 2012.

The FAA’s operations budget is decreased from the Treasury’s General Fund by more than $1.5 billion, and the difference is made up by increasing the share provided from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. This is a departure from recent FAA budgets, which have included significant General Fund contributions, and reflects the administration’s desire to cut spending derived from general government revenue to help reduce the federal budget deficit.

Department of Homeland Security:

The budget proposal provides $39.5 billion for the Department of Homeland Security, a decrease of $191 million or 5% below the amount enacted in 2012.

NATA Position
NATA is opposed to the proposed $100-per-flight user fee on general aviation. Over the past few years, the U.S. Congress has opposed any type of user fees on aviation to supplement the aviation trust fund. NATA understands the importance of sustaining the trust fund to ensure the safety and modernization of our national airspace system and, for this reason, we have supported a sensible tax increase on general aviation fuels. NATA will remain opposed to any user fee on general aviation that threatens the economic stability of our industry. In addition, the association will support the extension of bonus depreciation for general aviation aircraft, which is an important job-creating incentive for the industry and our country.

Status
The U.S. Congress will review and consider the proposal provided by President Obama, but it is the authority of Congress to make funding decisions on the FY13 budget.

Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

Click here to view as pdf.

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments to FAA on Authorization to Use Lower Than Standard Takeoff, Approach and Landing Minimums at Military and Foreign Airports

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:00 GMT

February 10, 2012

Docket Operations, M-30
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor
Washington, DC 20590-0001

Delivered electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket No. FAA-2012-0007, Authorization To Use Lower Than Standard Takeoff, Approach and Landing Minimums at Military and Foreign Airports

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA’s 2,000 member companies own, operate, and service aircraft. These companies provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation, and the military.

NATA represents more than 800 on-demand air charter carriers operating under Part 135 regulations. The association supports this direct final rule to permit eligible carriers to utilize lower than standard minimums at military and foreign airports.

The rule change will permit those operators that obtain authority for lower than standard minimums operations at U.S. airports to have the same authority at foreign and military airports. As noted by the agency in the rule discussion, similar authority already exists for Part 121 air carriers and Part 91 operators. Permitting Part 135 carriers this same ability, subject to issuance of the proper Operations Specification, will not have an adverse impact on safety and should pose positive economic benefits due to the elimination of delays experienced when an aircraft must delay departure until weather conditions improve to at least “standard” conditions.

NATA appreciates the Federal Aviation Administration’s timely response to this issue and welcomes the implementation of this regulatory change.

Sincerely,

Jacqueline E. Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs

Click here to view as pdf.
Click here for more information.

Letter to the Editor of the Star Tribune

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:57:00 GMT

NATA submitted the following commentary on the February 4th article written by Susan Feyder titled “3M Execs are Cutting Costs, But Flying High” in the Star Tribune of Minnesota. Click here to read Feyder’s article.

The February 4th article written by Susan Feyder titled “3M Execs are Cutting Costs, But Flying High” again highlights the Star Tribune’s apparent unwillingness to recognize the importance of general aviation to Minnesota as well as to the U.S. and global economies. Ms. Feyder’s article maligns an industry that is an enormous economic driver for Minnesota. The aviation industry:

Contributes $2.9 billion, $595 per capita, to Minnesota’s economy, making the state number nine on the list of leading states in terms of general aviation contribution per capita
Provides 37,600 jobs to Minnesota, totaling $1.86 billion in payroll, and the state is home to aircraft manufacturer Cirrus Design
Calls Minnesota home for the following aviation businesses that support the more than 7,700 aircraft in the state, including 3M’s fleet:
- 31 charter flight companies
- 55 repair stations
- 13 flight schools operating
- 102 fixed-based operators in the state.

There are 154 commercial and general aviation airports in the state serving 13,132 pilots.

The only part of this article that is accurate is that portion reporting that because of bad publicity, which would include Ms. Feyder’s article, sales of new general aviation aircraft have dropped by one third since 2008.

I encourage the Star Tribune to take its blinders off and recognize the value and importance of the general aviation community before joining the league of corporate aircraft bashers that fail to recognize the immense economic driver and job creator general aviation is to Minnesota. Those corporate aircraft are supported by hundreds of businesses in the state that fuel, maintain and clean the aircraft and provide a host of other services that bolster the Minnesota economy.

Not long ago former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty recognized the importance of general aviation by declaring the month of October “General Aviation Appreciation Month.” And last fall, 77 mayors from 44 states, including the mayors of Blaine, Duluth, and Pequot Lakes, sent a letter to President Obama asking him to stop criticizing general aviation.

General aviation is an essential part of America, serving in one way or another almost every citizen. It is fundamental to our nation’s economic strength as are interstate highways, international trade, and the Internet. I hope going forward the Star Tribune recognizes these facts and changes its outlook on a key economic driver for Minnesota.

Click here for more information.

Encourage Your Members of Congress To Support Repeal of Onerous Fuel Fraud Tax

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:01:00 GMT

ACTION CALL

ENCOURAGE YOUR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO SUPPORT REPEAL OF ONEROUS FUEL FRAUD TAX

February 8, 2012

What’s at Issue
NATA is seeking support for the inclusion of legislative language in H.R. 7, the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012 (the Highway Bill) to repeal the “fuel fraud” provision.

Why It’s Important
The fuel fraud provision, which was included in the 2005 Highway Bill, changed the collection of taxes for non-commercial aviation jet fuel and required the funds to be deposited into the Highway Trust Fund. This diversion of aviation fuel tax revenue has cost the Airport and Airway Trust Fund approximately $50 million annually since the bill’s enactment and is anticipated to cost another $500 million over the next ten years. This policy has increased Highway Trust Fund revenues at the expense of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. In addition, the burdensome process of filing for the 2.5-cent-per-gallon refund with the IRS has put an undue burden on aviation businesses although there is no substantial evidence to prove that fuel fraud is taking place.

What to Do
Contact your Members of Congress in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate today. NATA’s Legislative Action Center provides association members a quick, easy way to email letters directly to their Member of Congress.

Status
Much like the recently passed FAA Reauthorization Bill, H.R. 7 is moving quickly through both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate chambers. The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure approved the legislation and is awaiting the House Committee on Ways and Means to approve the tax title. It’s crucial that NATA members write their legislators today in support of a provision to repeal the fuel fraud tax provision.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

Click here to view in pdf.

Click here for more information.

Congress Approves FAA Reauthorization Bill

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:48:00 GMT

LEGISLATIVE REPORT

CONGRESS APPROVES FAA REAUTHORIZATION BILL

February 3, 2012

What’s at Issue
The U.S. House of Representatives voted on final passage of H.R. 658, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and related programs.

Why It’s Important
H.R. 658 includes a number of provisions that will impact the aviation community, including a comprehensive study of Part 135 operations along with the commissioning of a panel to review inconsistent interpretation and application of FAA regulations.

Major Provisions
Title I – Funding Authorizations

Authorizes programs for four years, Fiscal Year 2012 – 2015.
Allows the FAA to collect and administer registration and certification fees without detailing any fixed amounts.
AIP Definition
Allows general aviation airport sponsors to enter into a residential through-the-fence agreement without being in violation of federal grant assurances as long as the agreement meets specific conditions.

Title II - NextGen Air Transportation System and Air Traffic Control Modernization

Processes and funding for priority NextGen air traffic control modernization projects planned for the next four years are streamlined.
Deadlines and metrics are set for better measurement of NextGen progress as well as RNP/RNAV operations to ensure more effective cost management.
A public/private partnership will be developed to assist the FAA with expediting the equipage of general aviation and commercial aircraft with NextGen technologies.

Title III – Safety

Judicial Review of Denial of Airman Certificates – Any person significantly affected by a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) decision related to airman certificate action may obtain judicial review.
Helicopter Air Ambulance Operations - Part 135 certificate holders providing air ambulance operations are required to comply with Part 135 regulations for weather minimums and flight and duty time requirements. Requires the FAA to complete a prior rulemaking on air ambulances.
Inspection of Foreign Repair Stations – Requires the FAA to establish a system for assessing Part 145 foreign repair stations consistent with reporting requirements in the U.S.
Consistency of Regulatory Interpretations – Requires the FAA to establish an advisory panel consisting of government and industry representatives to review the October 2010 Government Accountability Office report on the certification and approval process and report recommendations on inconsistent FAA regulatory interpretations.
Maintenance Providers – Requires the FAA to establish regulation for work covered by employees of Part 145 repair stations.
Improved Voluntary Reporting System – Requires the FAA to ensure that corrective action is taken for voluntary disclosure.
Duty Periods and Flight Time Limitations for Flight Crewmembers - Rulemaking would be required to mandate that all other flight time flown by Part 121 flight crewmembers, including Part 91 flights for a certificate holder (i.e. repositioning flights) or Part 135 flights, apply toward the crewmember’s flight and duty time limitations. Requires the FAA to conduct separate rulemakings for Part 121 and Part 135.
Certain Flight Time Limitations for Flight Duty and Rest Requirements – Prohibits the FAA from finalizing a proposed change in how Part 135 flight, duty and rest regulations are interpreted.

Title IV – Air Service Improvements

Smoking Prohibition - Prohibits smoking on scheduled air carriers on domestic and foreign travel, including Part 135 flights with more than 20 seats.
Study of Part 135 Operations - Requires the FAA to analyze and report every three years Part 135 fleet data, including size and type of aircraft, equipment used, hours flown by each fleet, utilization rates and safety records.

Title V – Environmental Streamlining

Prohibition on operating certain aircraft weighing 75,000 pounds or less not complying with Stage 3 noise levels - The operation of a civil subsonic turbojet weighing 75,000 pounds or less to or from a U.S. airport is prohibited after December 31, 2015, unless the aircraft complies with Stage 3 noise levels, as certified by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (DOT).

Title VI – Aviation Insurance

This provision extends Authority to Limit Third-Party Liability of Air Carrier Arising From Acts of Terrorism to December 31, 2013.

Title VII – Miscellaneous

Study of Aviation Fuel Prices - A study on the impact aviation fuel price increases to bring additional revenue into the Airport and Airway Trust Fund would be commissioned. The study must include general aviation, piston aircraft purchase and use, the aviation services industry (including repair and maintenance services), aviation manufacturing, aviation exports, and the use of small airport installations.
Special Flight Rules for Washington Metropolitan Area - Requires the FAA and the Department of Homeland Security to submit a formal plan to the committee that outlines specific changes to decrease operational impact on general aviation aircraft in the national Capitol region.
Charitable Medical Flights - Allows volunteer aircraft operations to accept fuel reimbursement flown for medical purposes.
Lithium Batteries - Prohibits the DOT from enforcing any regulation on the transportation of lithium batteries in aircraft if the requirements are more stringent than the ICAO Technical Instructions.

Title VIII –Federal Aviation Research and Development

Aviation Fuel Research - Provides funds for the FAA and NASA to continue research and development into the qualifications for an unleaded aviation fuel and a safe transition for piston aircraft.

Title IX –Airport and Airways Trust Fund

Treatment of Fractional Ownership Programs - Determines IRS designation as non-commercial air transportation and taxation accordingly.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased that Congress was able to reach agreement on a number of differences, enabling a final agreement on legislation to reauthorization the FAA. NATA supports the provisions in the bill to study Part 135 operations as well as to continue to address inconsistent regulations within the FAA. In addition, the association supports the benchmarks included to ensure that NextGen proceeds in a consistent manner while the FAA attempts to accelerate and streamline the process for certification standards of NextGen technologies.

However, NATA remains concerned with the provision allowing residential through-the-fence agreements at public-use airports. Not only does this provision threaten the federal investment in our nation’s public-use airports, it also jeopardizes the businesses at those airports.

Status
The U.S. Senate is expected to vote on final passage of the conference report on Monday, February 6, 2012.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

View pdf format.

Click here for more information.

NATA Commends U.S. House Transportation Leaders For Approving Long-term FAA Reauthorization Bill

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:11:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer

Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA COMMENDS U.S. House Transportation Leaders For approving Long-term faa reauthorization bill

Alexandria, VA, February 3, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) today welcomed approval by the U.S. House of Representatives of a four-year, $63.6 billion bill to ensure continued aviation safety and infrastructure funding.

"I applaud House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Mica and Aviation Subcommittee Chairman Petri and Ranking Members Rahall and Costello, for their leadership in reaching an accord that will provide long-term funding and directional stability for the aviation industry that we simply did not have with the previous 23 short-term extensions," stated NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "While getting to this point has taken entirely too long, we appreciate the resolve that congressional transportation leaders had in finally making this bill become a reality."

It is expected that the U.S. Senate will approve the measure sometime next week.

"I hope the Senate approves this measure as quickly as possible so we can move past the legislative uncertainty that has been cast on our industry for the last five years and, instead, press forward with aviation safety, infrastructure and air traffic control improvements," concluded Coyne.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Letter to South Carolina Senator Phil Leventis in Opposition to Legislation Prohibiting Ramp Fees

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:15:00 GMT

January 30, 2012

The Honorable Phil P. Leventis
South Carolina Senate
608 Gressette Building
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Dear Senator Leventis:

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA's more than 2,000 member companies own, operate and service aircraft and provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation and the military.

On behalf of NATA’s member companies, I write in strong opposition to S. 1109, legislation that you recently introduced to prohibit fixed base operators (FBO) from charging a ramp fee to aircraft that use their facilities. As you are a former small business owner yourself, I am disappointed that you fail to realize the harm to small businesses at airports throughout the state your bill will cause. Additionally, I believe you have wrongly characterized aircraft that come to an FBO, park their plane, and use the FBO’s physical facilities as not using an FBO’s services. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

The services that FBOs provide, including aircraft parking, waiting areas, restrooms and security for both passengers and aircraft, are the reason that aircraft use these FBOs as opposed to dropping their passengers near any airport gate. FBOs are costly to build and maintain and recouping a reasonable return on investment is the goal of any business. In some locations, due to local market conditions, ramp fees play an important role in that business model. FBOs that do charge "ramp fees" are simply unbundling their services due to market conditions. Your bill would, in effect, prohibit a portion of this unbundling and force those aircraft operators who do purchase fuel, maintenance or other products to pay for those who use an FBO but choose not to purchase a product. This transfer of cost will allow aircraft operators who do not purchase a product to receive a "free ride" while those who do purchase products must pay the price for all users of the FBO. Using the power of the state legislature to treat FBOs as if they are a public accommodation is inappropriate.

It is not in the best interest of any business to have government control their pricing policies and procedures. While public airports receive public funding, most FBOs are private businesses built with an investment of private capital. This capital is put to use not only providing valuable aeronautical services at an airport but also relieving the taxpayers from having to provide these services.

According to the South Carolina Department of Commerce, general aviation supports 5,167 jobs and contributes more than $417 million to the state’s economy. In addition, general aviation generates $9.4 million in personal property taxes and $1.6 million in jet fuel taxes. South Carolina is home to 22 charter flight companies, 34 repair stations and 52 FBOs. FBOs are a valuable resource in both aeronautical services and airport development. Your bill, by allowing government to intervene in the management of these businesses, will reduce their ability to provide quality services and facilities at our nation’s airports.

I hope that you will withdraw S. 1109 to ensure that valuable aviation businesses in South Carolina are protected. To discuss this matter or any other issues related to general aviation, please contact me at (703) 845-9000.

Sincerely,

Eric R. Byer
Vice President for Government and Industry Affairs

To view in pdf, click here.

Click here for more information.

NATA Raises Funds For Combat Wounded

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:11:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA RAISES FUNDS FOR COMBAT WOUNDED

What can you do to help?

· Make a personal or corporate contribution to the NATA Wings for Warriors fund by visiting http://www.veteransairlift.org/m/(S(hsgfjc45s5us3s45igmsiyfi))/donate.aspx?campaign=NATAWFW2012
· Share the VAC mission with fractional share owners and card program members. Ask them to donate unused flight hours to the VAC.
· Give a corporate gift of flight hours to the VAC.

Visit http://www.veteransairlift.blogspot.com/ for the latest news on the VAC and to read stories from veterans and their families regarding the critical work of the VAC.

To view pdf version, click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

FAA Seeks Comments On Guidance For Part 135 New-Hire Training

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:31:00 GMT

FAA Seeks Comments On Guidance For Part 135 New-Hire Training

January 12, 2012

What’s at Issue
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published, and is accepting comments on, draft guidance explaining operator options for crafting Initial New Hire (INH) training programs for pilots who may have previous aircraft or air carrier experience.

Why It’s Important
The new guidance will trigger an inspector review of every Part 135 operator’s training program and could result in substantial program changes for many operators.

Major Provisions
For over a year, the requirements for training newly hired pilots who have prior experience has been unclear as some FAA inspectors were requiring a full INH program even for those pilots who are current and qualified on the aircraft and who have current Part 135 experience. In contrast, many operators were previously permitted to transfer some sort of “credit” for experienced pilots.

No Transfer or Credit for Prior Training
The guidance proposed by the FAA clearly reiterates the headquarters position that the training programs giving credit or allowing for a transfer for prior training or checking events is not consistent with the regulations and will not be permitting going forward. The agency does recognize that such programs were approved by the air carrier’s FAA-assigned inspector and directs the inspectors to conduct a review of all Part 135 training programs to remove such references.

Reduced Training Hours Curriculum
The FAA does stipulate that Part 135 air carriers may include in their training programs a “Reduced Training Hour Curriculum” that would be appropriate for pilots with prior experience in Part 135 operations and/or in the particular aircraft and duty position. Operators using a reduced training curriculum may not reduce training in the following areas:

Basic Indoctrination
Hazardous Materials
Emergency Training
Operator-specific approvals (i.e. OpSpec approvals or other inspector approvals)

Evaluations Are Operator Specific
The guidance also states that all testing and checks must be conducted by the hiring certificate holder and may not be “transferred” from one operator to another. Each pilot must complete the operator’s testing/evaluation and qualification modules.

Retraining Not Required
The notices states, “Retraining of affected crewmembers is not required unless the POI [Principal Operations Inspector] believes a proficiency or safety issue is involved.” As a result, while any program changes to the training program will impact pilots hired in the future, the status of crewmembers currently with a certificate holder does not seem to be in question.

Twelve-month Compliance Time
The FAA intends to give affected operators up to 12 months to revise and resubmit their training program once notification of the need to make changes is received.

NATA Position
The information contained in the draft notice may be a significant change for some operators. NATA is pleased the FAA is providing an opportunity for industry to comment on the notice and will coordinate with the association’s Air Charter Committee members in developing the NATA’s comments. All Part 135 operators should review the guidance and submit comments accordingly.

Status
The FAA published a notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance on December 27, 2012.

There is some confusion on the deadline for comment submission. The “Dates” section of the Federal Register notice and the online comment submission site Regulations.gov both state the comment deadline is February 27, 2012. However the text of the notice used the date of January 26, 2012. The FAA has clarified with NATA that the correct date for comments to be submitted is February 27, 2012.

Download the Federal Register notice.
Download the draft guidance notice.

Staff Contact: Jacqueline E. Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs
jrosser@nata.aero

Click here to download in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Oppose Senate Bill 1109 Prohibiting FBOs From Charging Ramp Fees

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:02:00 GMT

Oppose Senate Bill 1109 Prohibiting FBOs From Charging Ramp Fees

South Carolina State Senator Phil P. Leventis (D – Sumter and Lee Counties) introduced legislation, S. 1109, to prohibit fixed base operators (FBOs) in the state from charging a fee, including ramp fee, to aircraft that use their facility but do not purchase any services.

The bill was introduced on January 17th, and has been referred to the Senate Transportation Committee. It’s imperative that we act in opposition to defeat this bill. NATA members in the state of South Carolina are being asked to contact Senator Leventis as well as the Senators on the Transportation Committee in opposition to S. 1109.

Send an electronic message to Senator Leventis here.

Click here for a list of Senate Transportation Committee Members.

Click here for a sample opposition letter to S. 1109.

Contact the members of the Senate Transportation Committee and send an opposition letter on S. 1109 letter today!

Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

O'Toole Promoted To Comptroller

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:01:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
(800) 808-NATA
ebyer@nata.aero

O’TOOLE PROMOTED TO COMPTROLLER

Alexandria, VA, January 18, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) today announced the promotion of Johanna O’Toole to comptroller. O’Toole, who has been with NATA since 1998, previously served as director, administration & financial services.

“We are thrilled to promote Johanna to the position of comptroller,” stated NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “As comptroller, Johanna will lead an experienced team in the administrative/financial segment of NATA, overseeing the day-to-day operations of the association.”

Prior to NATA, O’Toole was an account manager at Degnon and Associates, an association management firm in McLean, VA. O’Toole also worked for the National Business Aviation Association as its manager of membership for more than 10 years. O’Toole holds several certificates and CPE credits in finance.

“Johanna has been an integral part of our senior management team for some time,” concluded Coyne. “Her hard work and dedication to the association is one of the reasons NATA has such a solid financial foundation.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

FAA Makes Positive Change To Takeoff Minimum Rule

Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:42:00 GMT

FAA MAKES POSITIVE CHANGE TO TAKEOFF MINIMUM RULE

January 12, 2012

What’s at Issue
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a direct final rule that will allow qualified Part 135 operators to conduct lower-than-standard takeoffs at military and foreign airports if they have received the proper Operations Specification (OpSpec).

Why It’s Important
This change would provide increased operational flexibility to Part 135 operators.

Major Provisions
Current Lower Than Standard Authority Limited to U.S.
Many operators have received lower than standard authority via OpSpec C079. However, that authority is limited to airports within the United States. The language currently at § 135.225 (f) limits operations to standard takeoff minimums at military airports and airports outside the United States. The authority of OpSpec C079 does not supersede the regulatory restriction of § 135.225 (f).

By making the change to § 135.225 (f), the FAA will be able to allow Part 135 operators who have obtained OpSpec C079 to use that authority at military and foreign airports. The direct final rule recognizes that changing § 135.225 (f) to allow the FAA to grant authority for lower than standard minimum takeoffs outside the United States would align Part 135 regulations with Parts 91 and 121, as both of those operating rules permit the activity when authorized by the agency.

The specific change to § 135.225 (f) is the inclusion of the phrase, “unless authorized by the certificate holder’s operations specifications.”

About a “Direct Final Rule”
Previously, the FAA granted an exemption that permitted operators holding OpSpec C079 to use that authority internationally. Because that exemption received no negative comment and because the FAA feels that there is no compromise in safety by making this change, they have issued the regulatory change as a direct final rule. If the FAA receives negative comments on this change, it would require the FAA then to conduct the traditional rulemaking with a notice and comment period prior to a final rule.

NATA Position
NATA applauds the FAA’s action on this matter and encourages members to submit comments supporting the change to the FAA. Such comments should be submitted on or before February 10, 2012.

Status
Assuming no negative comments to the rule are received, the revised rule will take effect on February 27, 2012.

Download the direct final rule as published in the Federal Register on January 11, 2012.

Staff Contact: Jacqueline E. Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs
jrosser@nata.aero

Click here to download in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA Releases 2012 Events Schedule

Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:21:00 GMT

NATA Releases 2012 Events Schedule

Alexandria, VA, January 6, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce its 2012 schedule of educational opportunities and events. NATA also recently released an events catalog, which can be accessed on the association’s homepage, www.nata.aero, or by clicking here.

"This coming year is shaping up to be one of the most pivotal years ever for our members,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “We're going to have an election, both in the White House and at the congressional level, which is very much going to determine the ability of our members to meet the needs of their customers. We also have a fiscal crisis across the country at the federal, state, and local levels that really puts many general aviation airports at risk. If any of our members have ever thought about participating in NATA events, this is the year to do it."

2012 Calendar Overview

Conferences, Events & Meetings
NATA Industry Excellence Awards Presentation and Dinner
March 28, Washington, D.C.

FBO Leadership Conference
March 28-29, Washington, D.C.

Day on the Hill Luncheon and Congressional Visits
March 29, Washington, D.C.

Spring Committee Meetings
March 30, Washington, D.C.

Air Charter Summit
June 11-13, Chantilly/Dulles, VA

Aviation Business Roundtable
November 12-13, Arlington, VA

Educational Seminars

NATA Safety 1st Ground Auditor Training Workshop
January 14-15, San Diego, CA

NATA Spring Training Week
March 5-8, Las Vegas, NV
(at the Cygnus Aviation Expo March 7-9)

Line Service Supervisor Training (LSST)
March 5-6, Las Vegas, NV
May 15-16, Windsor Locks, CT
Fall, TBD

FBO Finance Fundamentals
March 6-7, Las Vegas, NV

NATA Safety 1st Trainer
March 7, Las Vegas, NV
May 17, Windsor Locks, CT

Environmental Compliance Seminar
March 8, Las Vegas, NV

FBO Managers Workshop – Influencing Your Airport Commission
March 27-28, Washington, D.C.

Presidents Council
Visit www.nata.aero/presidentscouncil for an up-to-date schedule of Presidents Council activities and information on how to join.

Webinars
Visit www.nata.aero/webinars for an up-to-date schedule and a link to purchase archived webinars.

“To minimize time away from the office and help lessen the budgetary burden of travel, NATA is offering several comprehensive events starting with the Spring Training Week and A Capital Week for Business Aviation in March,” said NATA Vice President Eric R. Byer. “This year it’s all there so folks can come in for two or three nights to network and tackle some of the big, dicey issues together.”
For updates on conferences, events, seminars, webinars, and the Presidents Council activities, please visit the NATA Web site at www.nata.aero/events or www.nata.aero/presidentscouncil. Sponsorship Opportunities are available by clicking here or by contacting Diane Gleason, at dgleason@nata.aero or (703) 575-2050.

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Rolls Out Ground-Breaking FBO Audit Standard

Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:34:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA ROLLS OUT GROUND-BREAKING FBO AUDIT STANDARD

Alexandria, VA, January 5, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to present a ground-breaking audit standard specifically for FBOs. NATA established the NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit Standard to promote industry best practices and Safety Management Systems (SMS) development among ground handling providers in response to member requests for a safety standard and rating for FBOs. This audit standard is the first published audit for FBOs and other ground-handling service providers.

"NATA members expressed concern that their companies are subject to numerous audits by charter operators, fractional ownership program managers and many other consumers," said NATA Safety 1st Program Manager Elizabeth Nicholson. "The preparation and hosting of these audits drains both staff time and resources to accommodate the various audits, which range in complexity from completing and returning an electronic self-audit form to a multi-day on-site audit. The requirements of the auditing companies vary greatly, making preparation for the audits a year-round necessity."

NATA's Safety & Security Committee, which includes representatives from large and small FBOs, on-demand charter operators, fractional program managers, insurance brokers, fuel companies, and more, was instrumental in drafting this important new audit standard.

Objectives of the NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit Standard:

Achieve a standardized and consistent audit product acceptable to on-demand air charter operators, business aircraft operators, and other ground handling facility users
Develop a program similar in concept to that currently utilized by airline ground handling facilities
Follow an ISO-compliant format
Create one audit standard to satisfy operators, customers, and others by including:
- Best practices
- Safety Management Systems (FAA and ICAO standards
- Regulatory compliance (TSA, EPA, and OSHA)
Eliminate the need for multiple audits from numerous aircraft operators by providing consistent audits
Maintain online registry to confirm successful completion

"NATA Safety 1st is the industry-known leader in FBO safety and training programs. It became clear to us that a single standard for FBOs could eliminate the burden of multiple audits and raise the standard of safety throughout the FBO industry," said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne.

Find out more about NATA's Safety 1st Ground Audit by visiting www.nata.aero/groundaudit.

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Launches State Advocacy Network

Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:14:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT
Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA LAUNCHES STATE ADVOCACY NETWORK

Alexandria, VA, January 3, 2012 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) has launched a new State Advocacy Network (SAN) consisting of association members in every state who will serve as liaisons between member businesses, state legislatures, and the association.

"General aviation businesses are confronted with issues that require prompt attention, including airport and land use, security, taxation, aircraft noise and emissions," stated NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "Identifying pertinent legislation and regulations ahead of their implementation in every state throughout this county is one of the greatest challenges we face as an industry."

NATA’s SAN comprises volunteers who act as representatives to keep each other and the association informed of pressing issues in their states.

"NATA members are active participants in their states and local communities and as SAN volunteers their expertise and knowledge of issues affecting the industry are invaluable," concluded Coyne. "Staying informed of issues effecting aviation businesses throughout the country is vital to promoting the interests of our members as well as to defeating unwarranted policies."

For more information on the State Advocacy Network and how you can get involved, please visit www.nata.aero/SAN.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

GAMA, NATA Say DHS Inaction Hurts Security and U.S. Competitiveness

Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:25:00 GMT

WASHINGTON, DC, December 21, 2011 – Today, the U.S. aviation industry received notification from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that the final rule for aircraft repair station security will not be approved and published until the fourth quarter of 2012. This notification was prompted after 20 industry leaders sent a letter to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano asking that the rule, which has been under consideration for eight years, be finalized before the end of 2011.

TSA first held a public meeting on this rulemaking, mandated by the 2003 Vision 100 Century of Aviation Act, in 2004 and issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) five years later in November 2009. The aviation industry provided TSA with comprehensive comments on the nature and diversity of repair station operations and how to make this rule an effective, risk-based security regulation. The public comment period for this NPRM closed in February 2010 and work on a final rule has been ongoing for the past 21 months. As of August 2008, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been barred from issuing new certificates for repair stations outside the United States.

"Repair station security is clearly not a priority for DHS, despite Congressional direction requiring the agency to act on multiple occasions," said GAMA’s President and CEO, Pete Bunce. "The result of years of DHS inaction has unfairly punished the aviation industry by impeding exports and hampering manufacturers’ ability to capitalize on profitable emerging markets. It is astonishing that a federal department can procrastinate for more than eight years on an important security rule mandated by Congress. There are no excuses for such bureaucratic foot-dragging especially when it hurts our nation’s security and economic well-being."

"We are incredibly disappointed with the response offered by DHS," stated NATA President James K. Coyne. "The inability of DHS to offer a final rule stifles economic growth in a climate where aviation maintenance facilities big and small need all the help they can get."

Click here for more information.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Pilot Loading of Navigation and Terrain Awareness Database Updates

Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:15:00 GMT

December 19, 2011

Docket Operations
M-30
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Room W12-140
West Building Ground Floor
Washington, DC 20590

Delivered electronically via www.regulations.gov

RE: Docket No. FAA-2011-0763; Notice No. 11-05

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Pilot Loading of Navigation and Terrain Awareness Database Updates

NATA applauds the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for initiating this rulemaking to permit pilots, under specified conditions, to update databases for navigation and terrain awareness equipment and supports the concepts contained in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The FAA’s assertions that allowing pilots to perform these updates, in lieu of certificated mechanics or repair stations, will provide both operational and safety benefits. Part 135 on-demand operations frequently embark or disembark passengers at airports where the certificate holder does not have staff or facilities and where qualified maintenance services may not be reasonably available. Permitting database updates to be performed by properly trained pilots will reduce costs for operators and improve the safety of operations because flights will occur with the most current database information loaded.

Over the last few decades, technology advances have led us to the point where the regulations should be adapted to recognize the state of modern technology. In the past, database updates required special tools and, potentially, disassembly or removal of the system. Today, as noted by the FAA in the NPRM’s preamble, updating the databases is as simple as loading a memory card into a digital camera.

Therefore, in support of and to improve the proposed rules, NATA offers the following additional comments.

General Aviation and Part 135 Aircraft are Similarly Equipped

General aviation (i.e. Part 91) operators have had the ability for pilots to perform updates for several years without any known problems. Contrary to the FAA’s preamble statement that the navigational systems installed in general aviation (GA) aircraft are not similar to those installed on aircraft operated under Part 135 (see 76 FR 64861), the experience of our members is that the systems on GA and Part 135 on-demand aircraft are in fact largely the same.

Conditions and Limitations Imposed

Because pilots in the GA community have successfully completed these updates, NATA believes it is appropriate for Part 135 pilots to have this ability also. In recognition of the higher standards required of commercial operators, NATA believes that the proposed requirements for provision of specific written procedures and recordkeeping, in proposed § 43.3 (k) (2) and (4) respectively, are appropriate. Further, the restrictions proposed in § 43.3 (k) (1) and (5), specifically that updates that do not require disassembly of the unit and that the data uploads do not contain operating software revisions, are also appropriate at this time.

With regard to the requirements for the database medium, articulated at proposed § 43.3 (k)(3), NATA believes that it is the FAA’s intent that such medium be "in a field-loadable configuration that…[is] non-volatile…[and] non-corruptible upon loading…." However, the inclusion, in the regulatory text, of examples of current media types meeting the FAA’s intent may eventually be viewed as limiting as new media and data transfer technologies are developed. In order to allow this rule to retain the ability to apply to new technologies, NATA recommends that the FAA remove the examples from the proposed § 43.3 (k)(3) as indicated in the "Proposed Revision" section found later in these comments.

Location as a Defining Condition

In the changes proposed by FAA, the location of equipment is used as defining criteria for applicability of the rule. Under the language proposed by the FAA, pilots would only be allowed to perform updates on self-contained, front instrument panel-mounted and pedestal-mounted database systems. NATA believes this equipment location-based criteria is faulty as equipment location is not necessarily reflective of the ease with which updates are performed. Prohibiting a pilot from performing an update on a system where the update upload point is located in a pilot-accessible area other than the front panel or pedestal serves no safety purpose. NATA suggests that the FAA focus on the accessibility of the database upload point to the pilot as part of their normal duties rather than actual location of the database system.

NATA recommends striking "self-contained, front instrument panel-mounted and pedestal-mounted…" from the proposed 43.3(k)

Proposed Revisions (deletions ~~strikethrough~~, additions italicized)
(deletions , additions )
§ 43.3 Persons authorized to perform maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, and alterations.

* * * * *

(k) The holder of a pilot certificate issued under Part 61 of this chapter may perform updating of ~~self-contained, front-instrument panel-mounted and pedestal-mounted~~ air traffic control(ATC) navigational system databases(excluding those of automatic flight control systems, transponders, and microwave frequency distance measuring equipment (DME), and any updates that affect system operating software) provided—

(1) No disassembly of the unit is required;

(2) The pilot has written procedures available to perform and evaluate the accomplishment of the task; and

(3) The database is contained in a field-loadable configuration ~~and imaged on a medium, such as a Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD–ROM),Synchronous Dynamic Random-Access Memory (SDRAM), or other~~ that is nonvolatile ~~memory that~~ and contains database files that are non-corruptible upon loading, and where integrity of the load can be assured and verified by the pilot upon completing the loading sequences.

(4) Records of when such database uploads have occurred, the revision number of the software, and who performed the upload must be maintained.

(5) The data to be uploaded must not contain system operating software revisions.

Clarification on Applicability of §§ 91.1443 (b)(3) and 135.443(b)(3)

To date, the FAA has issued exemptions to several Part 135 on-demand operators that authorize pilots to perform navigational database updates. It has come to our attention that there may be some confusion as to whether these pilot-performed updates still require an airworthiness release executed by an authorized certificate mechanic or repairman as described in §§ 91.1443 (b)(3) and 135.443(b)(3).

As requiring such a signoff following an update and prior to flight would essentially negate the benefits intended by the FAA in those exemptions and this rulemaking, and in consideration of the fact that the proposed rule removes database updates from the "maintenance" category, NATA believes that the recordkeeping proposed by § 43.3 (k)(4) is sufficient and that §§ 91.1443 (b)(3) and 135.443(b)(3) as they apply to logbook entries do not apply in this instance. NATA requests that the FAA ensure this is clearly explained in the final rule to prevent any misunderstanding.

Economic Impact on Repair Stations

NATA is concerned that the NPRM’s preamble states that the rule, if adopted, could, "have a negative economic impact on certificated mechanics and repair stations that currently perform required updates for affected operations." (76 FR 64860) Shifting the classification of updates to navigational databases for air carrier aircraft from a function requiring authorized maintenance personnel to a pilot-performed function could indeed lead to air carriers no longer hiring authorized maintenance providers to perform navigational database updates. However, NATA fails to see the relevance to the analysis of this proposed rule change of that possibility. When the FAA proposes new regulations affecting air carrier aircraft that require actions by authorized maintenance personnel, the agency does not consider as a benefit the fact that certificated mechanics and repair stations will get more work. Therefore doing the opposite, considering, as a cost, the loss of business when the FAA deems a requirement is no longer applicable or necessary, should not occur either. Doing so would create a structural discouragement to modifying existing rules that have become out of date and no longer needed. For this reason, NATA believes that the FAA should not include this line of consideration in this rulemaking project.

Conclusion

As new aircraft and avionics technologies continue to be developed, the FAA will be challenged in many areas to ensure that its regulations do not become an outdated burden on aircraft operators. With this rulemaking, the FAA has acknowledged one of those situations and acted decisively to adapt to new, advanced technologies. NATA appreciates the opportunity to comment on this NPRM, and believes that the suggestions contained herein will enhance the agency’s objective of safely allowing the adoption and use of new technology.

Sincerely,

Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs

Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Letter To Secretary LaHood On DOT/FAA Diversion Forum

Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:07:00 GMT

December 8, 2011

The Honorable Ray LaHood
Secretary
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Dear Secretary LaHood:

A significant portion of our membership includes companies that provide services to scheduled air carriers as their primary business. These companies comprise NATA’s Airline Services Council (ASC). ASC member companies provide a wide range of services including aircraft fueling, ground handling, baggage service, catering, cleaning and security. Today, the ASC represents local, regional, state and international aviation service providers that account for approximately $5 billion in combined revenue, employ over 90,000 employees, and provide services at 425 airports in 67 countries. Airline services companies are a vital link in our nation’s air transportation system.

I wish to commend the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for holding the Diversion Forum to address issues that were highlighted during the early winter snowstorm this year so that future diversion events do not place an undue burden on the national airspace system. NATA staff attended the forum in the interest of furthering preparedness for weather and other emergency situations that require the diversion of aircraft. NATA and the ASC believe that preparation and communication are key elements in handling aircraft diversions.

NATA and the ASC would like to suggest that one component of preparation that is needed to effectively handle diversion events is an airport diversion plan. Such a plan would need to be completed by any Part 139 certificated airport and accepted by the FAA. Such a plan should be developed in coordination with airport ground service and fuel providers to ensure that needed equipment and manpower could be made available during a diversion event. The diversion plan would also cover airport specific operating plans that take into account security requirements and available space for additional passengers.

Ground service companies provide a critical role in an airports ability to properly manage a diversion event. NATA and its ASC members respectfully request to be a part of the process as the FAA works toward finalizing the best way to ensure that the airline industry works together in sharing information to better manage weather-related diversion in the future. In addition, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss the value of an airport diversion plan with you and your staff. We believe that with proper preparation future diversions, like the one that occurred in October of this year, these diversions can be handled more effectively and efficiently.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

With best regards,

James K. Coyne
President

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA President James K. Coyne Asks DOT and FAA to Intervene In CA Avgas Lawsuit

Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:36:00 GMT

November 30, 2011

Mr. Robert S. Rivkin
General Counsel
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Dear Mr. Rivkin:

As president and CEO of NATA and on behalf of our members located in the state of California, I am writing to you in response to your November 21^st letter to Congressman Flores and others regarding the ongoing Proposition 65 litigation in California regarding the use of leaded aviation gasoline (avgas). In the closing of that letter, you indicated that the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration would consider involvement in this matter in the event of ongoing Proposition 65 litigation involving avgas. As I am sure you are aware, the Center for Environmental Health (CEH) responded to the dismissal of our group’s federal lawsuit by filing its own suit, under Proposition 65, in state court the following day, October 20th.

In its state lawsuit, CEH contends that the sale of leaded aviation gasoline at airports represents a violation of the warning provision of Proposition 65 since aircraft that "take off and land" at airports where avgas is sold emit lead in the areas surrounding the airport. CEH asks the court to: (1) impose civil penalties of up to $2,500 per day per violation; (2) prohibit the sale of leaded aviation gasoline unless a warning, to be proposed by CEH, is provided to everyone residing near the federally obligated airports where the defendants operate; and (3) require the defendants to pay CEH’s legal fees.

As you indicated in your letter, and a position with which I concur, the preferable resolution to the issue of transitioning the general aviation industry to an unleaded fuel is through the completion of the ongoing federal rulemaking. However, the CEH suit in California poses a significant threat to that rulemaking. As I am sure you are also aware, many Proposition 65 lawsuits are resolved through settlement due to the very structure of Proposition 65 (where the burden of proof is on the accused) and the enormous potential penalties and other costs required in mounting a successful defense. Proposition 65 plaintiff’s attorneys have become deft at driving litigation into settlement rather than in-depth litigation. In this case, CEH has released many of the larger companies originally targeted in this suit and now has focused solely on a limited number of defendants, the FBOs that under airport minimum standards are required to sell avgas. Currently, other than one distributor, airport sponsors, aircraft operators, aviation fuel producers and distributors are not included in this lawsuit, despite their role in the industry and the use of avgas. Under the framework now established by CEH, with the leverage provided by California’s Proposition 65, these few FBOs are tasked with defending the use of an FAA-approved aviation fuel by federally certificated aircraft at federally funded airports and in federally controlled airspace. Without DOT and FAA intervention in this case, the future of aviation gasoline will be charted by the ability of these few small businesses to fight against a scheme that tilts the table in favor of the plaintiff’s narrow agenda and against orderly and thorough agency rulemaking that considers all the relevant public policy goals at stake.

For these reasons, NATA requests that the DOT and the FAA intervene in this case in a timely fashion to protect the national airspace system, federally funded airports, and the FAA’s authority to regulate the aviation industry. I would be happy to brief you and your staff further on the pending lawsuit and to discuss possible methods of DOT and FAA intervention in light of the current state of the case.

Sincerely,

James K. Coyne
President and CEO

Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

House Passes Transportation Funding Bill

Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:38:00 GMT

LEGISLATIVE REPORT

HOUSE PASSES TRANSPORTATION FUNDING BILL

December 2, 2011

What’s at Issue
The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation (H.R. 2112) that funds transportation programs, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), for fiscal year 2012.

Why It’s Important
The bill supports important aviation programs and services upon which the general aviation community relies.

Major Finding
The following are the major provisions within the bill:

Department of Transportation

$72.3 billion is provided for the Department of Transportation, 5.2% or $3.5 billion above the fiscal year 2011 bill.
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) – $15.9 billion is included for the funding and other provisions of the agency. This is an increase of $27 million over last year’s level and $746 million below the president’s budget request.
  - FAA Operations: $9.6 billion is included for operations, an increase of $139 million.
  - Facilities and Equipment (F&E): $2.7 billion is provided for F&E, the same amount was provided last year to modernize and improve air traffic control and airway facilities.
    - $8 million is included to hire 71 additional aviation safety inspectors.
  - Research, Engineering & Development: $167 million is provided, a $2 million decrease below last year’s level.
    - The bill provides $2 million in funding for research and testing of unleaded fuels and piston engine modification to seek a safe alternative to the currently utilized leaded aviation gasoline.
  - Airport Improvement Program (AIP): $3.515 is provided for AIP, the same funding level has been provided for AIP for the past seven years.
  - FAA Administrative Provision:
    - Prohibits funds from being used to change weight restrictions or prior permission rules at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey.
    - Prohibits funds from being used to limit the Block Aircraft Registration Request program.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased that the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate included transportation funding as one of the few appropriations bills approved for fiscal year 2012 so far this year. Funding for federal aviation programs is critical to the FAA’s mission of providing a safe national aviation system. Under the federal government’s tight budget constraints, the FAA received a fair funding allocation.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Applications for 2012 AMT Employer Award Program Now Available

Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:09:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

APPLICATIONS FOR 2012 AMT EMPLOYER AWARD PROGRAM NOW AVAILABLE

Alexandria, VA, December 1, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that applications for the 2012 Aviation Maintenance Technician Employer Award Program are now available.

This award program, now in its second year, is designed to recognize companies that employ aviation maintenance technicians (AMT) and encourage and support AMT training. The award is based on the percentage of AMTs employed (directly or indirectly) by a maintenance organization who participate in qualified training events.

In its first year, the AMT Employer Award Program recognized 28 companies for their dedication to maintenance training.

“We are very proud of this program, just as many aircraft maintenance providers are proud of their dedication to providing quality training to their AMTs,” said NATA Director of Regulatory Affairs Michael France. “The first year of this program was an overwhelming success and we look forward to even more participants this year.”

Applications for the 2012AMT Employer Award Program will be accepted through January 31, 2012. For more information on the program or to download an application packet, please contact Michael France at mfrance@nata.aero or visit NATA’s Web site at www.nata.aero/AMT.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Aviation Industry Seeks Final Rule on Repair Station Security

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:33:00 GMT

November 22, 2011

The Honorable Janet Napolitano

Secretary

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528

Dear Secretary Napolitano:

We the undersigned companies and associations are writing to express our concern with the lack of progress on the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) rulemaking regarding repair station security.

This rulemaking is the direct result of congressional mandates contained within the 2003 Vision 100 – Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act, and the 2007 Implementing the Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act. The former act required TSA to issue “final regulations to ensure the security of foreign and domestic aircraft repair stations” within 240 days while the latter act specifically prohibits the FAA from certifying any new non-domestic repair stations after August of 2008 if the TSA had not yet promulgated the required regulations.

TSA first held a public meeting on this rulemaking in 2004 and issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) five years later in November of 2009. The aviation industry provided TSA with comprehensive comments on the nature and diversity of repair station operations and how to make this rule an effective, risk-based security regulation. The public comment period for this NPRM closed in February of 2010 and work on a final rule has been ongoing for the past 21 months.

The United States has long been the world leader in aviation and American aircraft and parts remain one of our key exports with aerospace contributing positively to our nation’s balance of trade. The extensive delay in promulgation of a final rule regarding repair station security has a negative impact on our industry and the U.S. economy. American companies seeking to expand their markets overseas are hindered relative to foreign competitors due to the inability to get new repair stations certified.

We respectfully request that your department work with TSA and others in the federal government to finalize the rulemaking by Dec. 31, 2011. The publication of a final rule will enhance security and also remove a regulatory roadblock that is currently damaging American companies. We urge your department to move quickly on this rule.

View in PDF format

Click here for more information.

Call For Nominations - 2011 NATA Industry Excellence Awards

Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:42:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

CALL FOR NOMINATIONS – 2011 NATA INDUSTRY EXCELLENCE AWARDS

Alexandria, VA, November 18, 2011 ? The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) announces a call for nominations to acknowledge the individuals, offices, and organizations demonstrating excellence in their field and the highest level of customer service to the general aviation community.

Each year, NATA presents seven awards to the exceptional individuals and companies that have helped to improve the general aviation community. The recipients of five of these awards are chosen based upon NATA member-submitted nominations.

These awards cover five categories:

The Airport Executive Partnership Award recognizes an airport manager for outstanding efforts to nurture the relationships between aviation businesses and airport operators.

The Aviation Journalism Award identifies a journalist, writer, or publication that excels in consumer education or editorial support that is beneficial to the general aviation industry.

The Excellence In Pilot Training Award recognizes an individual or organization that has made outstanding contributions in safety, professionalism, leadership, and excellence in the field of pilot training.

The FAA Customer Service Excellence Award recognizes a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) facility or facility staff member who represents the highest degree of customer service and elevates the quality of interaction between the FAA and aircraft maintenance and repair facilities, Part 135 certificate holders, airport service organizations, and flight schools.

The ATP/NATA General Aviation Service Technician Award acknowledges the exceptional performance of a licensed airframe and power plant mechanic or radio repairman who has practiced his or her craft for a period of 20 or more years.

Last year’s winners were:

Airport Executive Partnership Award – John Bales, director of Spirit of St. Louis Airport in Chesterfield, Missouri
Aviation Journalism Award – Jeff Burger, Convention News Co.
Excellence In Pilot Training Award – William M. Hays, president and CEO, ATD Flight Systems LLC
FAA Customer Service Excellence Award – Columbus Flight Standards District Office
ATP/NATA General Aviation Service Technician Award – Eddie Stephen Taylor, Epps Aviation

All nominations for these five awards must be received by NATA no later than January 31, 2012. The nomination form is available by clicking here. Members may also obtain a nomination form by calling the NATA headquarters at 800-808-6282 or by e-mailing Celeste Clark.

The awards will be presented during the NATA Industry Excellence Awards Dinner on March 28, 2012, just preceding the NATA 2012 FBO Leadership Conference, 2012 NATA Day on the Hill, and Spring Committee Meetings to be held in the Washington, DC area on March 29-30.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Attention Charter Operators - New Customs User Fees Begin On November 5

Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:37:00 GMT

ATTENTION CHARTER OPERATORS -
NEW CUSTOMS USER FEES BEGIN ON NOVEMBER 5

October 25, 2011

What’s at Issue
Beginning on November 5, 2011, all commercial passengers arriving in the U.S. from another country are subject to the $5.50 Customs User Fee. Arrivals from Canada, Mexico and the adjacent islands are no longer exempt from this fee.

Please note that in an earlier announcement regarding this fee NATA incorrectly stated the effective date as November 15. The correct effective date is November 5. NATA regrets this error.

Why It’s Important
Currently, passengers arriving from Canada, Mexico, U.S. territories and possessions and the “adjacent islands” (defined below) are exempt from the $5.50 fee. The exemption for Canada, Mexico and the adjacent islands has been rescinded. Only the exemption for the U.S. territories and possessions remains.

Operators must begin collecting the per passenger fee on November 5, 2011.

Major Provisions
Since the 1980s, a fee has been imposed on the arrival of international commercial passengers by the United States Customs Service, now U.S. Customs and Border Protection. For many years, passengers from Canada, Mexico and the adjacent islands as well as passenger arrivals from any U.S. territory or possession were exempt from this fee.

Last week, the President signed legislation enacting a trade agreement between the U.S. and Columbia. A provision within that law (P.L. 112-42) removes many of the existing exemptions from the Customs User Fee.

The revised requirements are effective beginning on November 5, 2011. All air charter operators should prepare now to ensure that their invoicing and recordkeeping systems are updated to ensure the fee is properly collected and remitted. Operators that have not previously been required to collect this fee should act now to establish fee collection and remission procedures.

Information on the Customs User Fee is available on the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Web site at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/cargo_security/carriers/air_sea_fees/facthead.xml.

Please note that this page has not yet been updated to reflect the exemption changes imposed by the new law.

Adjacent Islands: The adjacent islands include St. Pierre, Miquelon, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Jamaica, the Windward and Leeward Islands, Trinidad, Martinique, and other British, French, and Netherlands territories or possessions in or bordering on the Caribbean Sea. Arrivals from these locations are now subject to the fee.

U.S. Territories/Possessions: Arrivals from U.S. territories and possessions remain exempt. Those locations are American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

NATA Position
NATA is disappointed that the Congress and President have chosen to impose new fees on commercial passengers and create new burdens on operators. The association strongly encourages operators to ensure that their business is prepared to implement this change.

Status
The imposition of the Customs User Fee on arrivals from Canada, Mexico and the adjacent islands begins on November 5, 2011.

Staff Contact: Jacqueline E. Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs
jrosser@nata.aero

View in PDF format

Click here for more information.

Cain, Mica Highlight Successful NATA Aviation Business Roundtable

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:19:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

CAIN, MICA HIGHLIGHT SUCCESSFUL NATA AVIATION BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE

Alexandria, VA, October 25, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA) annual Aviation Business Roundtable once again brought key executives in the industry together with some of the most influential decision makers in Washington, D.C. The two-day event (October 24-25) consisted of high-level meetings to discuss critical financial and political issues affecting the aviation business community.

“This time each year, NATA assembles panels and presenters to help us understand the most important issues that our industry faces. From the changing landscape at many airports to the uncertain prospects for regulatory and fiscal reform in Congress and within the administration, the discussions that unfold help all of us design our collective response to the chaos and complexity that is modern day Washington,” stated NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne.

The 2011 lineup of speakers was highlighted by a keynote speech by Republican Presidential Candidate Herman Cain, and also included:

A congressional aviation outlook session and breakfast with Congressman John Mica (R-FL), Chairman, U. S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

An opening session with J. Randolph Babbitt, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration.

Business perspective luncheon with Washington’s own Ted Leonsis, owner of multiple area sports teams, including the Washington Capitals.

OEM industry roundtable panel, including Joe Lombardo, Executive Vice President, Aerospace Group, General Dynamics, John G. Rosanvallon, President and CEO, Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation and Pete Bunce, President and CEO, General Aviation Manufacturers Association.

Aviation industry roundtable panel led by NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne with Marion C. Blakey, President and CEO, Aerospace Industries Association, Todd Hauptli, Senior Executive Vice President, American Association of Airport Executives and Edward M. Bolen, President and CEO, National Business Aviation Association.

An industry forecast by Michael Boyd, President, Boyd Group International, Inc.

General Aviation Infrastructure & Investment Coalition panel discussion with Michael Scheeringa, President, Signature Flight Support, Greg Arnold, President and CEO, Truman Arnold Companies, Clive Lowe, Vice President, Business Development, Atlantic Aviation and Jim Hopkins, Vice President, Sales & Charter, Landmark Aviation.

“The presence of NATA’s members at this event sends a message to the policymakers present at the roundtable. It gives us a forum to express our anger at radical new user fee proposals. It demonstrates our commitment to stand with others in the aviation community against misguided attacks against our industry, and especially against our customers. And it helps us declare that jobs in aviation are no less important than those in any other industry,” added Coyne.

Please click here to view the 2011 Aviation Business Roundtable program.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

FAA Issues Proposed Rule Allowing Pilots To Update Navigational Databases

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:05:00 GMT

Regulatory Report

FAA ISSUES PROPOSED RULE ALLOWING PILOTS TO UPDATE NAVIGATIONAL DATABASES

October 20, 2011

What’s at Issue
Yesterday, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking titled Pilot Loading of Navigation and Terrain Awareness Database Updates.

Why It’s Important
This proposed rule would amend federal regulations to allow all pilots to perform updates to aircraft navigational databases. Current regulations only allow pilots of aircraft operating under Part 91 to perform these updates.

Major Provisions
This rule would allow pilots to perform navigational database updates on “self-contained, front-instrument panel-mounted and pedestal-mounted air traffic control (ATC) navigational system database[s].” Presently, the updating of navigational databases is considered to be preventative maintenance, thereby allowing pilots to perform the updates only on aircraft operating under Part 91. Current regulations require that certificated maintenance personnel or a certificated repair station, not pilots, perform preventative maintenance on aircraft operated under Part 135.

The language of this rule change limits its actual applicability to Part 135 and fractional aircraft operators, as only navigational databases loaded directly into front instrument panel-mounted or pedestal-mounted systems would be affected. Avionics systems utilizing a data loader would not be covered by this proposed rule.

NATA Position
As technological advances simplify the operation of aircraft and their systems, it is imperative that the FAA respond accordingly to prevent outdated regulations from becoming burdensome upon the industry. The updating of navigational databases is one of those issues, and NATA is pleased that the FAA has begun this rulemaking project. However, NATA believes that the FAA has not fully addressed the issue. Numerous aircraft flight management systems that utilize a data loader to update their navigational databases are not included in this proposed rule. NATA will provide detailed comments to the FAA to help ensure that this proposed rulemaking project eliminates the burdens of outdated regulations on the industry.

Status
This notice of proposed rulemaking is open for public comment until December 19, 2011.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

View in PDF format

Click here for more information.

Urge Congress To Oppose Obama's User Fee Proposal

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:18:00 GMT

ACTION CALL

URGE CONGRESS TO OPPOSE OBAMA’S USER FEE PROPOSAL

October 17, 2011

What’s at Issue
President Obama has proposed, as part of the administration’s economic growth and deficit reduction plan, a $100 per-flight “user fee” for commercial and general aviation flights that use the air traffic control system.

Why It’s Important
The administration estimates that this user fee would raise roughly $11 billion over 10 years. Private aircraft are being targeted because the administration believes those aircraft’s share of the costs are not equal to that of commercial air carriers as users of the air traffic control system.

The aviation industry is united in opposing this proposal that would be detrimental to the general aviation industry, domestic manufacturing, small businesses, and our economic recovery. The aviation industry alone employs nearly 1.3 million workers and contributes more than $1.2 trillion to the U.S. economy.

What to Do
Contact your Members of Congress in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate today and request their opposition to this deficit reduction act proposal. NATA’s Legislative Action Center provides association members a quick, easy way to email letters directly to their Member of Congress.

NATA Position
General aviation user fees have been proposed by various administrations, both Republican and Democrat, and the U.S. House of Representatives have repeatedly and overwhelmingly opposed them. NATA has advocated for and Congress has supported the current system of aviation excise taxes, which are a stable, efficient, and equitable source of funding. Industry has even advocated for an increase in aviation fuel taxes as a means to support further the aviation trust fund. Per-flight user fees have crippled the general aviation industry in other countries, and the ramifications of such fees would be devastating in the U.S.

Status
The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction continually holds private meetings to discuss their proposal, which is to issue recommendations on how to cut the deficit by at least $1.5 trillion over 10 years. The recommendation must then receive an up-or-down vote in Congress before December 23, 2011.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA Announces New Membership Benefit With HD Supply Facilities Maintenance

Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:16:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Daniel B. Gurley III

Director, Membership & Business Development
800-808-6282
dgurley@nata.aero

NATA ANNOUNCES NEW MEMBERSHIP BENEFIT WITH HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE

Alexandria, VA, October 4, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce a new program with HD Supply Facilities Maintenance to provide association members access to discounted maintenance, repair and operational supplies. This membership benefit was recently negotiated to provide added value to NATA membership by saving time with HD Supply’s “one stop” approach and free delivery and by saving money with this consolidated purchasing program.

NATA members will receive the lowest checked price in HD Supply’s catalog − regardless of quantity. This represents a savings of up to 11 - 14% off of HD Supply’s core catalog prices.

HD Supply is the leading national wholesale distribution company that provides a broad range of products and services to professional customers in the infrastructure and energy, maintenance, repair and improvement, and specialty construction markets. With a diverse portfolio of industry-leading businesses, HD Supply is one of the largest diversified wholesale distributors in North America, with approximately 40 national distribution locations.

HD Supply offers a wide range of products including lighting, janitorial products, paint, HVAC, hardware, and window coverings, as well as hospitality supplies like linens, towels, soaps, shampoos and hair dryers. NATA members will particularly benefit from HD Supply’s offerings of hearing and knee protection, ramp cones, eye wash stations, and general safety and facility maintenance supplies.

“NATA is proud to offer its members a valuable savings program through HD Supply,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. “HD Supply not only saves our members money, but also time through direct order delivery.”

NATA members can learn more about the new HD Supply savings program by logging onto www.nata.aero and visiting the Member’s Resource area.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Standard Operating Procedure AIR-100-001 - Aircraft Certification Service Project Sequencing

Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:17:00 GMT

October 3, 2011

Mr. Renton S. P. Bean
Aircraft Certification Service, Aircraft Engineering Division (AIR-103)
Federal Aviation Administration
950 L’Enfant Plaza, 5th Floor, SW
Washington, DC 20024

RE: SOP#: AIR -100-001; Standard operating procedure – aircraft certification service project sequencing

Dear Mr. Bean:

In this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) explains the process used to sequence certification projects: “All applications for new certification and validation projects requiring more than 40 hours of dedicated FAA work effort are prioritized, on a national basis, based primarily on the project’s impact on safety and availability of resources.”

NATA Interest in this Standard Operating Procedure
While this SOP has been implemented to increase the efficiency of the Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) and alleviate the strain on the FAA’s limited resources, the project sequencing process still renders significant delays to applications for certification/validation. These delays will continue to affect economic growth and efficiency of the aviation industry. The AIR’s certification backlog not only affects the financial aspect of the industry but also impacts the improvement of safety as the industry’s utilization of new initiatives and advanced technology is delayed.

With regard to this SOP, NATA offers general comments and recommendations on the AIR’s project sequencing process.

It is important for the FAA to provide adequate, timely and consistent support to the aircraft certification process. NATA believes various factors have play in the delays of the aircraft certification process. There has been inconsistent interpretation of rules, standards, and policies between FAA offices, which at times creates a deadlock in the process as offices try to determine how to proceed. The project sequencing process gives inadequate access, especially to small business owners. Some methods used in project sequencing are wasteful.

NATA requests that the FAA form an advisory committee to conduct an analysis and evaluation of the AIR process to identify and eliminate waste and recommend effective changes to optimize the work flow of project certification. It’s recommended that the FAA develop and implement a system to track delays and wait-listing of applications and the reasons for delays in order to communicate submission status better to applicants. A timeline for response should also be developed for better communication with applicants when they are being delayed.

New aircraft technology and modifications that are being developed for aircraft improve the overall safety of the aviation industry and raise the standard of safety not only in the United States but also globally.

Aviation has been one of the country’s key contributors to the gross economy. The U.S. aviation/aerospace manufacturing industry has held a competitive edge across the globe. Delaying these projects will only put America at a competitive disadvantage in the future.

Closing
NATA is an advocate of the general aviation industry and its partners that aid in enhancing the safety and growth of the industry. The AIR plays a vital role in advancing new innovations, parts, and aircraft that propel the industry to greater heights. However, there are significant challenges within the project sequencing process that must be addressed. We believe that, with a detailed investigation and evaluation of the process, the FAA will be able to identify the bottlenecks and implement corrective actions to get the process flowing.

Sincerely,

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Bill Providing Relief To California Flight Training Industry Becomes Law

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:31:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

BILL PROVIDING RELIEF TO CALIFORNIA FLIGHT TRAINING INDUSTRY BECOMES LAW

Alexandria, VA, September 21, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is pleased to announce that California Governor Jerry Brown has signed Senate Bill 619 into law as Chapter 309. SB 619 was introduced by State Senator Jean Fuller, sponsored by NATA and supported by many in the industry. SB 619 provides relief to many of the flight training facilities that were facing burdensome regulation from the California Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE). With the signing of SB 619, flight training providers and flight training programs that pose no financial risk to students are exempted from the BPPE’s regulations.

The fight for relief began in early 2010 after the California legislature included flight training in the BPPE’s regulatory authority with the passage of Assembly Bill 48. Flight training providers were never included in the development and debate over this bill and the result was regulation that threatened to harm flight training severely in the state.

“While we wish this long process could have been avoided in the first place through inclusion of flight training providers in the legislative process, today’s signing of SB 619 speaks volumes about the power of our industry when we all stand up and work together,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne.

“Today’s signing of this bill marks the end of a long battle to ensure that California flight training remains a vibrant contributor to our state economy. I am proud to have worked alongside NATA and many others in the flight training industry in passing this legislation,” commented Senator Fuller, a pilot and author of the legislation.

Under the new law, flight training providers and programs that do not require upfront payment of fees in excess of $2500 and also do not require students to enter into contracts of indebtedness are exempted from regulation by the BPPE.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

General Aviation Groups Strongly Oppose User Fees in White House Proposal

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:26:00 GMT

For Immediate Release
September 19, 2011

General Aviation Groups Strongly Oppose User Fees in White House Proposal

Contacts:
Geoff Hill, AEA, (816) 347-8400
Chris Dancy, AOPA, (301) 695-2159
Dick Knapinski, EAA, (920) 426-6523
Katie Pribyl, GAMA, (202) 393-1500
Matt Zuccaro, HAI, (703) 683-4646
John Cudahy, ICAS, (703) 401-1719
Eric Byer, NATA, (703) 845-9000
Henry Ogrodzinski, NASAO, (703) 417-1800
Dan Hubbard, NBAA, (202) 783-9360

WASHINGTON, DC, SEPTEMBER 19, 2011 - The nation's leading general aviation (GA) associations today forcefully opposed user fees for GA flights proposed in President Barack Obama's proposal for addressing the nation's deficit and job crises.

The Aircraft Electronics Association, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, the Experimental Aircraft Association, the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, the Helicopter Association International, the International Council of Air Shows, the National Association of State Aviation Officials, the National Air Transportation Association and the National Business Aviation Association jointly issued the following statement.

"As primary representatives of the general aviation community, we are expressing our unified opposition to the new $100 per flight tax in your proposal. We believe this per-flight tax not only imposes a significant new administrative burden on general aviation operators who currently pay through an efficient per-gallon fuel charge at the pump, but it will also necessitate the creation of a costly new federal collection bureaucracy.

"As you know, the issue of how general aviation can best contribute revenue to the federal government has been the subject of significant study and debate as part of the FAA reauthorization process. After careful consideration, both chambers of Congress have passed bills that endorse the per-gallon fuel charges rather than adopt a per-flight tax similar to the one you propose. In fact, Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives felt so strongly about this issue that 116 members of that body sent you a letter earlier this year saying new aviation charges like the one you are now proposing would be ‘dead on arrival.’

"Mr. President, many foreign countries have imposed per-flight charges on general aviation and the results have been devastating. Please do not go down that dangerous path and cost jobs in our community.

"Per-gallon fuel charges work. Per-flight taxes destroy."

###

Click here for more information.

NATA President Asks DOT, FAA & EPA To Support CA Avgas Coalition

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:30:00 GMT

September 7, 2011

The Honorable Ray LaHood

Secretary

U. S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable Randy Babbitt

Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

The Honorable Lisa Jackson

Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

RE: August 25, 2011 letter from California Deputy Attorney General on Proposition 65 and Avgas

Dear Secretary LaHood, Administrator Babbitt and Administrator Jackson:

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress, federal agencies and state governments. NATA's over 2,000 member companies own, operate and service aircraft and provide for the needs of the traveling public by offering services and products to aircraft operators and others such as fuel sales, aircraft maintenance, parts sales, storage, rental, airline servicing, flight training, Part 135 on-demand air charter, fractional aircraft program management and scheduled commuter operations in smaller aircraft. NATA members are a vital link in the aviation industry, providing services to the general public, airlines, general aviation and the military.

I am writing in response to the August 25, 2011 letter from the California Attorney General’s office. In that letter, Deputy Attorney General Susan Fiering purports to clarify several issues relating to the threat of suit by the Center for Environmental Health (CEH) under California’s Proposition 65, by which CEH seeks to regulate the sale, use and distribution of leaded aviation gasoline (avgas) in California. She states that her office has no plans to file a suit against our members based upon CEH’s allegations that our members have violated Proposition 65. She then points out that CEH has since withdrawn the allegation in its original Notices of Violation (NOVs) that the use of avgas violates the Prop 65 discharge prohibition, and claims that the amended NOVs are now focused on the Prop 65 warning requirement. According to the letter, even if its lawsuit is eventually successful, “avgas could continue to be sold in California.”

For several reasons, I take strong exception to Ms. Fiering’s characterization of the issues here.

First, the state attorney general is hardly a neutral observer. Ms. Fiering fails to disclose that her office has vigorously opposed our effort to obtain a federal court ruling even on whether the Prop 65 warning requirement is preempted by federal law. Just last week, the state attorney general filed a brief seeking dismissal of our entire complaint – including our claim for declaratory relief that federal law does not allow California to regulate the sale of avgas by requiring warnings to persons traveling through public use airports. Ms. Fiering also fails to disclose that her office will receive 75% of any penalties imposed on our members should CEH prevail in its threatened Proposition 65 lawsuit. It is obviously in Ms. Fiering’s interest, therefore, to forestall the United States government from expressing its independent position in this litigation.

Second, while CEH deleted the discharge claim from its amended NOV, a cover letter to the California fixed base operators, avgas producers and distributers named in the NOV reserves the right to reassert these allegations at a later date. The withdrawal of the discharge claim represents little more than legal maneuvering to prevent the court from reviewing our request for declaratory relief. With CEH able to reassert those claims at any moment (presumably as soon as the federal court accepts their arguments and CEH files in state court), the continued availability of avgas in California still remains in grave doubt.

Third, CEH still seeks to curtail the sale of avgas in California. Its proposed “resolution” of the impending lawsuit against our members provides a Hobson’s choice: pay millions in back penalties for “failure to warn” of the supposed danger of lead emissions and either stop selling fuel to piston aircraft operators (which requires relief from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-required minimum standards for airport fuel sellers) or warn millions of passengers who pass through and residents who live nearby California airports. Given the litigation climate in California, mass warnings will inevitably prompt spurious tort claims by persons claiming exposure to lead. Our members are small businesses that can’t afford to defend state court litigation over conduct that is perfectly lawful under prevailing federal regulation.

Our national airspace system is one of this nation’s great achievements. Our utilization of aircraft for economic growth is unmatched anywhere in the world. A key reason for this success is that the regulations and laws governing aviation are set by national policy, and individual states and localities are not permitted to impose additional rules and regulations that interfere with that policy. Despite Ms. Fiering’s opinion, the bottom line is this: The availability of an FAA-approved aviation fuel is under serious threat in California. For that reason, and the others expressed by several members of Congress and in our formal complaint filed in federal court, I respectfully request the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to weigh in on this issue by means of an amicus brief or statement of interest that supports our request for declaratory relief.

Sincerely,

James K. Coyne

President and CEO

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA's Safety 1st Updates De/Anti-Icing Training In Time For The Season

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:50:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA’S SAFETY 1ST UPDATES DE/ANTI-ICING TRAINING IN TIME FOR THE SEASON

Alexandria, VA, September 8, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA’s) Safety 1st is pleased to announce the release of its updated De/Anti-icing training module. Winter weather training programs like NATA’s Safety 1st De/Anti-Icing module are designed to familiarize line service specialists with the responsibilities of their job and give an overview of the skills necessary to ensure safe aircraft departures. The De/Anti-icing training module was first released in 2010 and viewed by many FBOs in preparation for the icy season.

What’s New, Updated and Expanded?

Supplementary documentation on different types of contamination
Holdover table (HOT) graphics
2011-2012 HOTs are now linked in the training
Communication section between crews and deicing technician
Anti-icing and deicing sections to clarify sequence of procedures
Quizzes and exams

As with all of NATA’s online training, the De/Anti-Icing module is systematically reviewed by panels of industry experts to glean suggestions for continuous improvements and updates. NATA Director of Safety and Training Amy Koranda said, “Members from NATA’s Safety & Security Committee, representing FBO and charter operators, volunteered to review the De/Anti-Icing Module. Those who reviewed the module had great input for refreshing and expanding the training to make it better for all trainees deicing on the line.”

The updated De/Anti-icing training module has been reviewed by several prominent operators and here is what some have had to say:

Steve McNeely, manager, safety management systems, Jet Solutions LLC, commented, “Our chief pilot, a maintenance supervisor and I reviewed the De/Anti-Icing training module. We were pleased that the training repeatedly showed where not to spray fluid, and that teaching de-icing the tail first is very important and needs to be communicated. Also, the ability to look up the actual FAA-published holdover times was viewed as significantly important. Our consensus is that this is important training and very well done.”

“It is a great product for FBOs that provide deicing. The De/Anti-Icing module provides the right amount of training for our industry,” said Troy Meryhew, director of franchise operations, Million Air.

Visit www.nata.aero/plst to learn more about this and other training modules and to register today!

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

FAA Issues Rule On Hiring Of Former FAA Personnel

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:54:00 GMT

FAA ISSUES RULE ON HIRING OF FORMER FAA PERSONNEL

August 29, 2011

What’s at Issue
On August 12, 2011, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a final rule regarding the hiring of former FAA personnel by certificated entities.

Why It’s Important
This final rule affects whom a certificated entity may hire to represent its interests before the FAA.

Major Provisions
This final rule prohibits entities performing operations under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 121, 125, 133, 135, 137, 141, 142, 145, 147 and subpart k of Part 91 from employing former FAA personnel, who had oversight responsibility of the operator, to represent that operator before the FAA for a period of two years. Specifically, a certificated operator may not:

“Knowingly employ or make a contractual arrangement which permits an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the Federal Aviation Administration if the individual, in the preceding 2 years—
(1) Served as, or was directly responsible for the oversight of a Flight Standards Service aviation safety inspector; and
(2) Had direct responsibility to inspect, or oversee the inspection of, the operations of the certificate holder.”

This final rule does not prohibit a certificate holder from employing former FAA personnel in a position that does not involve representing the certificate holder before the FAA.

NATA Position
NATA encourages all members impacted by this new limitation to review the regulations to ensure compliance.

Status
This Final Rule is effective on October 21, 2011.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

FAA Issues Final Rule Affecting Flight Training

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:37:00 GMT

August 31, 2011

What’s at Issue
Today the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a final rule titled Pilot in CommandProficiency Check and Other Changes to the Pilot and Pilot School Certification Rules.

Why It’s Important
This final rule makes significant changes to the regulations affecting flight training, and completes the rulemaking begun with the issuance of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in August 2009.

Major Provisions
This final rule makes the following changes to Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 61 and Part 141:

Recurrent Proficiency Check for a Pilot-in-Command of a Single-Piloted Turbojet-Powered Aircraft - § 61.58(a)(1) & (2) and (d)(1)–(4) — This rule extends the requirement for recurrent proficiency checks to pilots operating single-piloted turbojet-powered aircraft. In response to comments from the industry, the FAA made changes from the proposed rule that are meant to accommodate the unique needs of operators of experimental jets.

Application for and Issuance of an Instrument Rating Concurrently With a Private Pilot Certificate - § 61.65(a)(1), Part 141, Appx. M — This rule allows the application for and issuance of an instrument rating concurrently with a Private Pilot Certificate. This new rule allows flight training providers operating under Part 61 or Part 141 to utilize a combined Private Pilot/Instrument rating course. In response to industry comments, the FAA modified the proposed rule by allowing 45 of the 50 hours of cross-country flight experience needed as a prerequisite for an instrument rating to be completed with an instructor in the aircraft. The reasoning for this change is that if a student is pursuing a combined private pilot/instrument rating, all cross-country flight would necessarily be completed under a student pilot certificate requiring each flight to be endorsed by a certified flight instructor. The FAA and industry commenters felt that this would result in a reduction in safety.

Conversion of a Foreign Pilot License to a U.S. Pilot Certificate - § 61.71(c) — This rule allows the conversion of a foreign pilot license to a U.S. certificate under the provisions of a Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA) and Implementing Procedures for Licensing (IPL).

Revision to the definition of ‘‘complex airplane’’ - § 61.1(b)(3) — This rule revises the definition of a “complex airplane” to include those aircraft equipped with Full Authority Digital Engine Controls (FADEC).

Expanded Use of Airplane With a Single Functioning Throwover Control Wheel for Certain Kinds of Flight Training- § 91.109(a) and (b)(3) — This change permits the use of a functioning throwover control wheel for certain flight training that includes the flight review required by § 61.56, and the recent flight experience and instrument proficiency check required by § 61.57.

Exception to Requirement for Ground Training Facility When Training Is an Online Computer-Based Training Program - § 141.45 and § 141.55(c)(1) — This rule change excepts Part 141 pilot schools and provisional pilot schools from the requirement to describe each room used for ground training when the training course is an online computer-based training program.

The NPRM that preceded this final rule had also proposed a rule change that would have exchanged the requirement for 10 hours of training in a “complex airplane” for 10 hours of advanced instrument training for the issuance of a commercial pilot certificate. The FAA decided not to implement this proposal in this final rule but indicated that further consideration of commercial pilot training rules is likely in the future.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased with the majority of this rulemaking. However, the association is disappointed that the FAA has decided not to adopt the changes that had been proposed to commercial pilot training. As stated in NATA’s comments to the NPRM that preceded this final rule: “Today’s fleet of single-engine complex aircraft that are suitable for flight training are quickly approaching 30 years in service. After decades in use as flight training aircraft, many of these complex aircraft are quickly becoming unsuitable for flight training, either through increased maintenance costs or safety issues. Since aircraft manufacturers have moved away from producing single-engine complex aircraft that would be suitable for flight training, flight schools and student pilots are left little option.” NATA will continue to work with the FAA to address this issue.

Status
This final rule is effective on October 31, 2011. A full version of the final rule is available here.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero
Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Contact Governor Brown Today In Support of SB 619

Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:55:00 GMT

ACTION CALL
August 31, 2011

CONTACT GOVERNOR BROWN TODAY
IN SUPPORT OF SB 619

NATA’s sponsored bill SB 619 (Fuller) is heading to the Governor. NATA, on behalf of its members, has worked diligently to obtain long-term relief from the regulations issued by the Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education (pursuant to AB 48, Chapter 310, Statutes of 2009) that are crippling to the flight training community. SB 619 contains an exemption from the regulations for any flight instructor or flight training facility that:

Does not require upfront payment of tuition of fees in exchange for training, and
Does not require students to sign a contract of indebtedness in exchange for training

Students will still be able to purchase “block time” in amounts up $2500.

NATA is calling on members for one last push and call to action. Now is the time to contact the Governor’s Office and urge a signature on SB 619. NATA requests that members and other interested individuals fax a letter to the Governor and call his office today.

California Governor’s Office Contact Information:
Phone – (916) 445-2841
Fax – (916) 558-3160

Click here for a sample letter to fax to Governor Brown.

Click here for talking points in support of SB 619.

Please contact Governor Brown today and ask him to sign SB 619 without delay.

NATA’s legislative and grassroots efforts in California, to find relief for flight training business, are close to success. However, your support is still needed. Consider making a donation to NATA’s California Flight Training Fund to help offset some of the costs of this battle.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director of Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Bill Providing Relief To Flight Training Passed By California Assembly

Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:21:00 GMT

MEMBER UPDATE
August 26, 2011

Bill Providing Relief To Flight Training Passed By California Assembly

Yesterday, Senate Bill 619 (SB 619) was passed by the California Assembly by unanimous consent. The bill provides relief to many of the flight training facilities that were facing burdensome regulation from the California Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education. SB 619 was introduced by State Senator Jean Fuller, sponsored by the National Air Transportation Association and supported by many in the industry, including the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.

SB 619 simply provides an exemption from the current law for any flight instruction provider or flight training program that meets the following two conditions:

The provider or program does not require the student to enter into a contract of indebtedness, and
The provider or program does not require the prepayment of instruction-related costs in excess of $2,500.

SB 619 was also amended in the California Assembly to insert an urgency provision. This urgency provision will cause SB 619 to become effective immediately upon signature of the California governor but also requires a two-thirds vote from each house of the legislature.

SB 619 must now go back to the California Senate for a concurrence vote, which is expected to occur by next Friday. In its original consideration, the Senate passed SB 619 unanimously. If passed again by the Senate, SB 619 will head to Governor Brown for his signature.

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

TSA Issues Final Cargo Screening Rule

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:15:00 GMT

TSA ISSUES FINAL CARGO SCREENING RULE

August 19, 2011

What’s at Issue
On August 18, 2011, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued a final rule, Air Cargo Screening, which modifies the interim final rule (IFR) regarding air cargo screening that was issued in 2009.

Why It’s Important
With this final rule, the TSA addresses the comments provided by industry regarding the 2009 IFR by making several changes to the Certified Cargo Screening Program (CCSP).

Major Provisions
This final rule makes two substantive and several clarifying and typographical changes to the rule governing the CCSP.

Substantive changes to the CCSP

The TSA has eliminated all provisions for the use of third-party validation firms within the CCSP. The TSA explained this change by noting that “there were fewer CCSP applicants than expected and TSA is capable of processing applications itself.” Under this final rule, all oversight and inspections will be provided by the TSA.

The TSA has removed the requirement that air carriers screening cargo at off-airport locations be certified under the CCSP. The TSA notes, “The security programs for aircraft operators have been and will continue to be amended to ensure that the same level of security involving screened cargo is equivalent to that for [facilities certified under the CCSP].”

Clarifying changes to the CCSP

The TSA indicated in the rule preamble that security threat assessments (STA) performed for the issuance of airport Security Identification Display Area (SIDA) media would be acceptable for use by facilities certified under the CCSP

The TSA clarified the language in Title 49 CFR 1549.7(b)(1) to make it clear that facilities certified under the CCSP must apply for renewal of their security programs and their certification every 36 months.

In addition to the substantive and clarifying changes, the TSA has reevaluated the fee structure for STAs contained within 49 CFR 1540.209. Due to changes in the size of the pool needing STAs, the

TSA estimates that the cost for an STA will increase from previous levels to a $31 to $51 level. The TSA provides significant amounts of data supporting the proposed increase in fees and has asked for industry comment on the proposed increase. The final fee will be published as a notice in the Federal Register.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased that the TSA addressed the comments the association submitted in response to the 2009 interim final rule. In those comments, NATA expressly questioned the use of a third-party, “for-profit” entity in performing the governmental role of oversight of the CCSP program. While the TSA’s rational for eliminating third-party validators is based upon different rationale, the association is pleased to see the TSA retain all oversight authority for the CCSP. In addition, NATA is particularly pleased to see the agency recognize the burden imposed by duplicative security requirements such as requirements for multiple STAs.

NATA will evaluate the data the TSA is using to justify its proposed increased in STA fees and will submit comments to the agency on behalf of its members.

Status
This final rule is effective on September 19, 2011. The TSA will also accept public comments on the proposed increase in STA fees until September 19, 2011. A full version of the final rule is available here.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

Click here to view in PDF format

Click here for more information.

House Lawmakers Call For Federal Intervention On Avgas Claim in CA

Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:24:00 GMT

HOUSE LAWMAKERS CALL FOR FEDERAL INTERVENTION ON AVGAS CLAIM IN CALIFORNIA

Alexandria, VA, August 10, 2011 – The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) applauds the efforts of U.S. Representative Brian Bilbray (R-CA) in signing a letter to Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Randy Babbitt, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson requesting federal intervention on an intended lawsuit against fixed base operators (FBOs) and fuel distributors for supplying and using leaded aviation gasoline (avgas) in the state of California. The allegation, by the Center for Environmental Health (CEH), is that FBOs and fuel distributors failed to warn the public that avgas contains lead, violating the California Safe Drinking Water & Toxic Enforcement Act (Prop 65).

"The Prop 65 lawsuit will disrupt ongoing efforts by the FAA and EPA, who are working with industry groups to identify an alternative to leaded fuel that can be safely and reliably used by piston-powered airplanes,” the congressional letter states. The letter further points out that “the Prop 65 action would, if allowed to move forward, interfere with the national interest in ensuring uniform and workable regulation of aircraft engine emissions for the sake of aviation safety and our environment.”

“NATA and a coalition of small business owners consisting of FBOs and fuel distributors have engaged common counsel and filed a lawsuit against the CEH asking a federal court in Fresno, California, to enjoin the misuse of Prop 65 to regulate the supply and use of leaded avgas,” stated NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne. "The coalition believes that federal law preempts the state of California from regulating in this area.”

“Any lawsuit under Prop 65 initiates state enforcement proceedings in California and can lead to imposition of huge civil penalties, which would cripple the small businesses that sell avgas,” Coyne explained. “Aircraft have used leaded aviation gasoline under FAA and EPA regulations for decades.”

The letter was also signed by House General Aviation Caucus Co-Chairman Sam Graves (R-MO), Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA), Tom McClintock (R-CA), Don Young (R-AK), Leonard Boswell (D-IA), Richard Hanna (R-NY), Aaron Schock (R-IL), Tom Petri (R-WI), Randy Hultgren (R-IL), Chip Cravaack (R-MN), Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), Billy Long (R-MO), Lynn Jenkins (R-KS) and Bill Flores (R-TX).

####

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Congress Reaches Agreement on FAA Extension; Federal Excise Taxes to be Reinstated

Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:56:00 GMT

Congress Reaches Agreement on FAA Extension; Federal Excise Taxes to be Reinstated

Today, the U.S. Senate approved legislation ending the two-week partial shutdown of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. President Obama promptly signed the bill into law to resume federal excise taxes.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has provided general information on the collection of aviation-related taxes and intends to provide further guidance. Importantly, the collection of taxes must resume no later than 12:01 a.m. on Monday, August 8, 2011.

NATA encourages operators and FBOs to review this information at the IRS Web site and to continue to monitor that site for further updates. Click here to view the IRS information page on aviation taxes.

Click here for more information.

Federal Excise Tax Update

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:20:00 GMT

Federal Excise Tax Update

Congress has not yet acted to reauthorize the FAA. As a result, the excise taxes remain expired. The IRS has posted several questions and answers related to the expired taxes on their Web site. NATA encourages operators and FBOs to review this information. Click here to view the IRS information.

NATA offers the following additional guidance for air charter operators and FBOs.

Charter Operators
For any transportation that occurs between July 23 and the eventual reauthorization of the FAA’s taxing authority, charter operators may not charge their customers for the following items:

• 7.5% passenger tax
• Segment fees
• International Facilities Fees
• Alaska/Hawaii Fees
• 6.25% cargo tax

Some operators have expressed concern that the taxes could be retroactively imposed. Based upon historical precedent (from when aviation excise taxes have previously expired) it is highly unlikely that the taxes could be applied retroactively. NATA cautions operators that they may not charge a tax that doesn’t exist.

When quoting trips for future dates, operators may wish to consider a statement that the quote does not include federal excises taxes, which may or may not be imposed on the trip depending on when it occurs and when it is paid.

Charter operators should inquire with FBOs as to whether fuel that they purchase is taxed and retain records so they may be able to document potential future refund requests for fuel used in commercial operations. Operators should also note when/if they are purchasing untaxed fuel.

FBOs
Most fuel currently in FBO tanks has already been taxed. FBOs need not alter their pricing for fuel they currently hold. Noncommercial operators and FBOs would not be entitled to refunds on fuel that was properly taxed prior to July 23, 2011.¹

Not all components of the federal taxes on fuel have expired. According to IRS information, the deficit reduction tax as well as the Leaking Underground Storage Tank fund tax are still in effect. The tax rates on aviation gasoline and kerosene used in noncommercial aviation, during the FAA authorization lapse, are 4.4 cents per gallon.

Going Forward

The IRS is expected to provide additional specific guidance on how the industry should handle specific circumstances; however that guidance is not yet available.

As soon as further information becomes available, NATA will alert the membership.

Please contact Jacqueline Rosser at jrosser@nata.aero with any questions.

¹Due to the so-called fuel fraud tax, FBOs holding an ultimate vendor registration from the IRS would still be eligible for the 2.5 cent per gallon refund that they currently obtain on any jet fuel taxed at the highway rate.

Click here for more information.

FAA Authorization Ends Tonight - Federal Excise Taxes Set To Expire

Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:21:00 GMT

FAA Authorization Ends Tonight - Federal Excise Taxes Set To Expire

Because Congress did not approve an extension today, the FAA's authorization will expire at midnight. This will impact both availability of certain FAA services and the collection of taxes that are deposited in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. Those funds are used to pay some FAA operating expenses as well as airport improvement programs.

The taxes will not be reinstated until Congress acts to reauthorize the FAA in either a short-term extension or a long-term reauthorization bill.

Essential FAA services, such as Air Traffic Control, will continue uninterrupted. The FAA will inform employees whether their job requires them to continue working during the lapse in funding authorization. Employees whose salary is funded by trust fund revenues will be furloughed. NATA expects the FAA to announce the status of various offices and employees soon. FAA announcements should be posted to www.faa.gov.

The Senate has adjourned for the weekend so it will be at least Monday afternoon before any action to reauthorize the FAA can occur.

Transportation Taxes
Beginning at 12:01 a.m. on Saturday, July 23, 2011, the following taxes should not be collected for transportation that occurs during the lapse in FAA authorization:

• 7.5% excise tax
• Segment fees
• International Facilities Fee
• Alaska/Hawaii Fees
• 6.25% cargo tax

Fuel Taxes
Fuel currently in FBO tanks or in aircraft has already been taxed. FBOs need not alter their pricing for fuel they currently hold. FBOs receiving new fuel deliveries should remain aware of whether the fuel has been taxed, especially if the expiration of taxes continues for a longer period of time.
Commercial operators eligible for a refund or credit for fuel used for commercial purposes will remain eligible for those refunds when they purchase fuel that was taxed.

NATA has reached out to the Internal Revenue Service for more information on how FBOs and operators should handle specific tax situations and will update the membership as more details become available.

Click here for more information.

General Aviation Industry United in Opposition to Renewed User Fee Proposal

Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:26:00 GMT

General Aviation Industry United in Opposition to Renewed User Fee Proposal

Alexandria, VA – The nation’s leading general aviation organizations on Tuesday, July 19, 2011, sent a joint letter to all members of the U.S. House and Senate, urging them to abandon a proposal to charge a $25 “departure fee” on both airline and general aviation flights.

In the letter, the presidents of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), the Helicopter Association International (HAI), the National Air Transportation Association (NATA), and the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) tell the legislators, “Our community is deeply concerned about reports suggesting that current negotiations to raise the debt ceiling are giving rise to a resoundingly discredited approach to raising revenues from our industry—user fees.”

The entire general aviation industry believes that the current fuel excise tax system is the most efficient and effective way for general aviation to contribute to the aviation trust fund. Experience elsewhere in the world, on the other hand, demonstrate that user fees cripple general aviation, doing irreparable harm to a vital economic driver.

"Bad ideas, like bad pennies, have a habit of turning up again and again in Washington,” said AOPA President and CEO Craig L. Fuller. “User fees are a bad idea that hurts an entire industry, the economy, and the nation. They simply make no sense. Time and again we've seen that they stifle aviation and compromise safety."

“GA already pays its fair share and then some for the small segment of the national airspace system that it uses,” said Rod Hightower, EAA President/CEO. “A user fee system will not only create an expensive and unnecessary federal bureaucracy, but also instantly hinder the growth of general aviation and drive more job losses in our country.”

“Now is not the time to revisit the bad idea of user fees,” said Matthew S. Zucaro, president of HAI. “Such a detrimental initiative will only result in a debilitating effect on the helicopter community. Helicopters perform missions on a daily basis for the greater good of society—such as emergency medical transport, aerial firefighting, law enforcement, search and rescue, disaster relief, national security, and counterterrorism. Helicopter operators already pay more than their fair share when one considers their minimal impact on the ATC infrastructure. Enough is enough.”

“It is time for everyone to take a collective deep breath and make certain that changes are not made on the fly that hurt general aviation’s economic recovery,” said GAMA’s President and CEO Pete Bunce. “User fees have crippled general aviation in Europe and the last thing we want to see in the U.S. is user fees growing the federal bureaucracy.”

“Instead of embracing the economic growth and jobs this great industry provides to the U.S., the President continues to vilify our community,” stated NATA President & CEO James K. Coyne. “It’s time for this Administration to cease any and all consideration of a user fee system for a general aviation community that is still recovering from the recession.”

“As policymakers have thoroughly reviewed the idea of user fees in recent years, the general aviation community has consistently said that we should not try to adopt foreign-style user fees, but should instead build upon the time-tested and proven fuel-tax system,” said NBAA President and CEO Ed Bolen. “This pay-at-the-pump mechanism is the best – and should remain the exclusive – means for the industry to meet its tax obligations.”

In their letter, the leaders conclude, “We urge you not to create an expensive new federal collection bureaucracy that will need to be funded on the backs of general aviation operators in the name of deficit reduction. It is a nonsensical and self-defeating approach.

“For general aviation, fuel taxes work – user fees do not. There has to be a way for our industry to pay at the pump rather than creating a new federal collection bureaucracy. Please do not destroy a great national asset and critical industry.

Click here for more information.

NATA’s Safety 1st Safety And Health Training – Now Online

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:57:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA’S SAFETY 1ST SAFETY AND HEALTH TRAINING – NOW ONLINE

Alexandria, VA, July 13, 2011 — Today, the National Air Transportation Association’s (NATA) Safety 1st launched 18 new online safety and health training modules. These modules were developed using the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) standards and regulations and are specifically designed to train employees at aviation businesses.

NATA’s 18 modules include back safety, bloodborne pathogens, cold stress, ergonomics, fall protection, fire extinguishers, forklift safety, hazard communication, hearing conservation, heat stress, ladder safety, lockout tagout, machine guarding, office safety, personal protective equipment and respiratory protection. Companies can buy only those modules applicable to their job. From office workers to maintenance technicians, line service personnel, pilots and more, the modules allow the user to create a curriculum that best meets their job requirements. Each module averages 30 to 45 minutes in length and all 18 modules can be completed in approximately 10 hours.

“The best news about this online training is that it is available any time your employees want to train and it can be accessed using existing Safety 1st online training credentials, said NATA Director of Safety and Training Amy Koranda. “With 18 modules to choose from, employees can take their time going through training concepts and, once complete, run through a quick exam to confirm their training.”

NATA’s Safety 1st Safety and Health Training for Aviation Facilities Online Training Features…

Anytime, anywhere availability
The latest best practices and industry standards
Lessons illustrated with high-quality photos and diagrams
Electronic reporting of student progress
Universal login for PLST Online participants

Online Training Allows You To…

Put safety first
Instruct to one standard
Improve operational efficiency and effectiveness
Ensure safe employees and service
Track student progress automatically; eliminate tedious training paperwork
Stay current with the latest regulations
Minimize time away from work

Additional information can be found at http://nata.aero/plst/osha_curriculum.html.

“With the range of NATA Safety 1st online educational modules now available, NATA members are realizing the convenience and financial benefits of adding Web-based training to their safety programs,” said NATA President and CEO James K. Coyne.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

GAO Reports On GA Airport Security

Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:19:00 GMT

June 30, 2011

What’s at Issue

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has published a study, "General Aviation: Security Assessments at Selected Airports", that reports on the adoption of security measures, and their effectiveness, at 13 general aviation (GA) airports.

Why It’s Important

The report could lead some readers to believe that GA airports pose security vulnerability for the United States, due to the fact that the GAO restricted their review to implementation of a limited number of security measures without incorporating a complementary assessment of security risks as part of their review.

Major Provisions

GAO evaluated security measures at 13 GA airports. The GAO staff evaluated whether airports had, for example, perimeter fencing and lighting, access controls, on-site law enforcement and cameras monitoring the airport, among other provisions.

The review included 10 airports that serve only GA and 3 airports that also support some scheduled commercial air service. All airports had lighting around the hangars, and 12 airports had full or partial fencing in place.

The adoption of other security measures varied at the airports reviewed. The majority of the airports, however, had implemented most of the measures evaluated.Because the airports reviewed by GAO were not statistically representative, the agency acknowledges that there is no ability to extrapolate the results of their study to GA airports in general.

NATA Position

NATA is disappointed with the GAO study. The GAO made no attempt to quantify how the so-called vulnerabilities it identified actually relate to known threats. Further, the GAO report did not take into consideration security measures implemented by FBOs, aircraft owners and air charter operators that would also mitigate the ability for unauthorized access to occur. It is impossible to determine whether security at any given airport is sufficient unless the review includes defined risks and an evaluation of how specific security measures mitigate those risks. The GAO appears to have concluded, in somewhat of a vacuum, that because the TSA recommends certain security measures (or requires them at airline-served airports) that these directly correlate to substantive risks at the GA airports evaluated. But to the contrary, the Transportation Security Administration has consistently stated that there are no known threats posed by general aviation that would justify any further regulatory or legislative mandates. The only logical conclusion, which was missed by the GAO, is that the security measures voluntarily adopted by airports are appropriate to the relatively low known risks.

Status

The GAO report, "General Aviation: Security Assessments at Selected Airports," is available for download.

Staff Contact
Jacqueline Rosser
Director, Regulatory Affairs
jrosser@nata.aero

Click here for more information.

Coalition Seeks Injunction to Block Efforts In California to Ban Sales of Aviation Gasoline

Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:35:00 GMT

Coalition Seeks Injunction to Block Efforts In California to Ban Sales of Aviation Gasoline

Alexandria, VA, July 1, 2011 – A coalition of small business fixed-based operators (FBOs) and fuel distributors who sell leaded aviation gasoline (avgas) in California have sued the Center for Environmental Health (CEH) and the Attorney General of the State of California in response to a notice of an intended lawsuit against coalition members for supplying and using leaded aviation gasoline, allegedly in violation of the California Safe Drinking Water & Toxic Enforcement Act (Prop 65). The National Air Transportation Association (NATA), which has engaged common counsel with the coalition to protect the interests of all NATA members, is supporting this group with facilitation and administrative services.

Today, the coalition asked a U.S. judge to issue an injunction to stop Prop 65 enforcement actions from proceeding. According to the complaint, the Prop 65 lawsuits will disrupt ongoing efforts by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), who are working with industry groups to identify an alternative to leaded fuel that can be safely and reliably used by piston-powered airplanes. Because any lawsuit under Prop 65 initiates state enforcement proceedings in California and can lead to imposition of huge civil penalties, which would cripple the small businesses who sell avgas, the complaint seeks immediate relief to protect the rights of coalition members to sell avgas under federal law and the U.S. Constitution. Aircraft have used leaded aviation gasoline, under FAA and EPA regulations, for decades.

The legal actions come on the heels of the May 9, 2011 “notices of violation” issued to a large number of California aviation fuel suppliers and airport FBOs, claiming they failed to warn residents near airports that aircraft emissions contain lead and "discharged" lead through engine emissions on take-off and landing. In the Notices CEH proposes as “remedies” a complete bar on the sale of leaded avgas, clean up of allegedly contaminated drinking water sources, and the payment of substantial civil penalties -- plus CEH’s attorneys’ fees.

“The CEH litigation under California Proposition 65 threatens to interfere with obvious federal interests in aviation safety and aircraft engine emissions policy,” stated NATA President & CEO James K. Coyne. “It is imperative that the issues involving the safe and effective transition to an unleaded aviation gasoline be addressed in a coordinated way at the federal level, and that the FAA and EPA play their role as the agencies whose expertise will be applied through activities that are already well underway.”

In addition to NATA’s efforts, the group has received significant support from the General Aviation Manufactures Association (GAMA), the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), all of whom share a common interest with the coalition in protecting the GA community from efforts to utilize state laws to block the sale of avgas in California.

Additional Supplemental Information

The remedies sought in the Prop 65 enforcement suit would shut down the entire piston-engine aircraft fleet in California and end all flight training at the named airports, with a detrimental impact on related economic activity. CEH has claimed that aircraft operators can freely substitute unleaded automobile gas for leaded avgas – suggesting a course of action that could put tens of thousands of aircraft operators and pilots in jeopardy if they were to use unapproved fuel.
California alone has 254 public-use airports, 219 of which are general aviation airports. These airports are home to 99,594 pilots and 37,128 general aviation aircraft that rely upon aviation gasoline. General aviation is an important economic engine that accounts for 1.7 million jobs in your state.
The coalition complaint points out that federal law completely preempts the use of local law such as Proposition 65 to block or limit the sale of aviation gasoline in California or elsewhere. According to the complaint, the Federal Aviation Act bars state law from being used to regulate the routes and services offered by air taxi and charter airlines, while the federal Clean Air Act bars states from applying local emission standards to aircraft or engines. The complaint explains how a state prohibition on the sale and use of aviation gasoline would undermine the FAA’s authority over safety certification of aircraft and aircraft engines. Only the FAA may specify what type of fuel may and may not be used by aircraft.
Currently, no safe alternative exists to replace leaded aviation gas for the entire piston-powered aircraft fleet. Indeed, the FAA has observed, “Over 160,000 piston-engine aircraft rely on this fuel for safe operation. The lead additive in avgas protects piston engines against damaging detonation (or engine knock) at the higher power levels required by aircraft. Operation with inadequate fuel performance can result in engine failure and aircraft accidents.”
Fortunately, significant federal and private resources are being expended to facilitate a transition away from the necessary use of lead in aviation gasoline. The FAA, with exclusive oversight for aviation safety, and the EPA, which oversees environmental regulation of aircraft emissions, are hard at work with the general aviation industry – including fuel producers, developers and distributors, aircraft and engine manufacturers, and consumers – on the safe transition to an unleaded aviation gasoline for piston-powered aircraft. This collaboration is being accomplished through the FAA’s Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee, which is tasked to address a host of factors including safety certification, fuel production and distribution, and environmental and economic concerns. The industry has also filed comments in an ongoing EPA rulemaking.
Additionally, Congress has expressed a significant interest in prioritizing federal activities by the FAA and NASA qualifying unleaded aviation fuel and safe transition to this fuel for the fleet of piston engine aircraft. The House FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011 (H.R. 658) includes a provision directing the FAA to develop a plan, within 120-days of enactment, containing the specific research and development objectives for a transition to an unleaded aviation gas, including consideration of aviation safety, technical feasibility, and other relevant factors, and the anticipated timetable for achieving the objectives. The general aviation community is asking Congress to authorize $2 million annually over four years in the FAA’s research and development budget for Alternative Fuels for General Aviation, as requested in the President’s budget. This research program will help develop FAA performance and certification methodologies necessary for qualification and certification of alternative unleaded aviation fuels.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Responds to Obama’s Disparaging Comments On GA

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:51:00 GMT

NATA Responds to Obama’s Disparaging Comments About General Aviation

Alexandria, VA, June 29, 2011 — National Air Transportation Association (NATA) President and Chief Executive Officer James K. Coyne, on behalf of NATA’s 2,000 member companies, is appalled by President Barack Obama’s attacks on general aviation during a press conference today. The president stated that the White House is going to push to eliminate or scale back a series of tax deductions, including tax depreciation schedules for general aviation airplanes, in hopes of raising as much as $400 billion in new revenue over ten years.

“President Obama has repeatedly degraded the value of general aviation to our nation’s economy. This time, he does so a day after appearing at an American aircraft manufacturing facility to promote job growth,” Coyne stated.

Coyne added “it is perplexing why the President continues to bash an industry that is responsible for thousands of manufacturing, maintenance and service jobs.”

“The President's comments before a national audience could weaken consumer confidence in general aviation utilization at a time when economic indicators are demonstrating that the community is finally starting to recover from the recession. The President should instead promote the many vital contributions of the general aviation industry to the U.S. economy,” Coyne concluded.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Contact CA Assembly Committee Members in Support of SB 619 Today!

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:39:00 GMT

Action Call

Contact CA Assembly Committee Members in Support of SB 619 Today!

In 2009, the California State Legislature passed a bill that included the flight training industry under the regulatory oversight of the California Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE). Because this bill was passed without any input from the industry, it was structured in a way that imposed a nearly impossible to meet burden on California flight schools.

In 2010, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA), in partnership with the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), mounted a legislative effort to delay compliance with the new rules affecting flight training. This effort was successful, giving flight schools until July 1, 2011, to find a long-term solution.

NATA and AOPA arranged a second legislative effort in order to obtain long-term relief from the regulations issued by the BPPE. Currently, Senate Bill 619 contains language that would provide an exemption from the rules issued by the BPPE for any flight training facility or flight instructor that:

Does not require upfront payment of fees in exchange for training, and
Does not require students to sign a contract of indebtedness in exchange for training

Students will still be able to purchase “block time” in amounts up $2500.

SB 619 will be heard in the California Assembly Committee on Higher Education and the Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection in the next two weeks. Now is the time to contact the members of these committees and let them know the importance of passing this bill. Without passage of SB 619, all California flight schools will be subject to the BPPE’s regulation and fees.

Click here for a listing of California Committee on Higher Education and California Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection members.

Click here for talking points in support of SB 619.

Click here for a sample letter in support of SB 619.

Contact the members of these committees and fax an SB 619 support letter today to ensure the continued viability of flight training in California!

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director of Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Congressional Committee Reports On TSA Screening Models

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:27:00 GMT

CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE REPORTS ON TSA SCREENING MODELS

June 9, 2011

What’s at Issue
The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure released a report on the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) airport passenger security screening models. The report demonstrates that the private-federal screening option known as the Screening Partnership Program (SPP) is the most cost-effective screening model. The report further illustrates that the all-federal screening model is more costly and less efficient.

Why It’s Important
The Aviation Transportation Security Act of 2001 (ATSA), which created the SPP, was signed into law following the September 11, 2001terrorist attacks. The SPP was established to allow TSA-certified contractors, under federal supervision and regulation, to conduct passenger and baggage screening at airports. The law provided that airports could “opt-out” of all-federal screening and utilize private screening contractors. However, in January, TSA Administrator John Pistole made the decision not to allow airports to utilize the SPP, and denied the applications of Glacier Park International Airport (GPI), Yellowstone Airport (WYS), Missoula International Airport (MSO), Bert Mooney Airport (BTM) and Springfield Branson National Airport (SGF) to opt out of the federal screening model.

Major Finding
The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure staff thoroughly investigated both the federal and SPP screening models by reviewing two of the largest airports in the country, San Francisco International Airport (SFO) and Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). SFO utilizes the SPP model and is the largest U.S. airport in the program while LAX operates with all federal TSA screeners. The following are the major findings in the report:

The federal government could save $1 billion over five years if our nation’s top 35 airports operated as efficiently as SFO under the SPP model.

If LAX joined the SPP, the federal government would save $38.6 million a year on federal salaries, recruitment and training costs. Total savings would exceed this amount because overtime and injury rates were not considered due to TSA officials not releasing this information to committee staff.

SPP screeners are 65% more efficient than federal security screeners.

According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the TSA did not consider cost savings that would result from increased screener efficiencies when conducting a cost comparison of the SPP and federal models.

Since its inception, the TSA has hired 137,000 staff and spent $2 billion on recruiting and training costs. High attrition has resulted in the TSA spending too much time managing the federal screening program and has not provided enough resources to oversight and regulation of U.S. transportation security.

The TSA’s SPP application process needs to be evaluated. An airport operator is required to fill out an application for the SPP model and provide a one-sentence rationale for applying for the program.

The TSA claimed they did not communicate with unions regarding SPP. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and TSA officials met with the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the union urged the administration to review the SPP program and policies.

The United States is the only country in the world that allows a government agency to operate as security personnel, administrator, regulator, and auditor at airports. Many international governments contract the role of airport security personnel to private screening companies, which allows those governments to focus on security standards, oversight and enforcement regulations. Private models such as the SPP are said to drive innovation, increase performance and lower costs.

Committee Recommendations

The TSA Administrator should not have the discretion to deny any airport authority’s SPP application. As the law states, every airport authority is entitled to opt out of the federal security screening model.

The TSA should determine the criteria to pre-qualify private security companies to compete for SPP contracts.

The SPP application process needs to be revised to require more significant information from airport authorities.

The transition process from the federal screening model to the SPP model at airports should take less than one year instead of 24 months, as it does currently.

The TSA should develop performance criteria for federal screeners and, if federal screeners fail to meet the standards, the airport should be immediately transitioned to the SPP model.

NATA Position
NATA is pleased with the committee report, which highlights the importance of ensuring that the private-federal screening model is preserved for the airports for which they choose to apply it. Federal cost savings and increased efficiencies are vital components to maintain security standards and safety at our nation’s airports.

Staff Contact: Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NPRM Safety Management Systems For Certificated Airports

Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:35:00 GMT

June 5, 2011

Docket Operations, M-30
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket Number FAA-2010-0997, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Safety Management Systems for Certificated Airports

Submitted electronically via www.regulations.gov

With this rulemaking, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes changes to Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 139 (Part 139) that would require airports certificated under that part to develop and implement a safety management system (SMS). The proposed changes to Part 139 include required components and functional processes of the required SMS. NATA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on these proposed changes.

Multiple Rulemaking

Currently, the FAA has two separate and distinct SMS rulemaking projects underway: this rulemaking that proposes to apply an SMS standard to airports certificated under Part 139, and rulemaking that would establish a new 14 CFR Part 5 and apply an SMS standard to 14 CFR Part 121 air carriers. Other certificated entities, such as 14 CFR Parts 135 and 145, will be included in the new Part 5 at some future date. The objectives and purposes of these separate rulemaking projects are nearly identical: to create an International Civil Aviation Organization-compliant SMS regulatory standard and apply that standard to a certificated entity. The only difference in the objectives and purposes of these two separate rulemaking projects is the certificated entities to which they are applied. The FAA acknowledges in both rulemakings that the SMS regulatory standard must be scalable and adaptable enough to account for the many differences in the certificated entities’ operations.

NATA agrees with this approach and believes that the very nature of SMS as an operational process supports this approach. Therefore, NATA questions the agency’s decision to pursue two distinctly separate regulatory SMS standards. If this approach is carried through to the conclusions envisioned in the rulemakings, all certificated entities will be subject to the Part 5 SMS standard except airports certificated under Part 139, which will be subject to the SMS standard found in 14 CFR Part 139. The interconnected nature of aviation operations does not support this approach, nor does the nature of SMS as an operational process support the idea of multiple standards.

NATA strongly recommends that these separate SMS rulemakings be suspended, combined and reissued as a new single SMS regulatory standard.

Tenant Oversight

Airport sponsors have always retained some level of oversight, regarding safety, to tenant operations; however, this rulemaking seeks to push airport sponsors to assume the primary role for safety, including tenant “employee safety, ground vehicle safety, and passenger safety to the extent they are related to aircraft operations”

This rulemaking proposes requiring airport sponsors at airports certificated under Part 139 to develop and implement an SMS that is applicable to “aircraft operations in the movement area, aircraft operations in the non-movement area, and other airport operations addressed in this part.” The FAA clearly intends for the SMS requirement to extend to areas leased to businesses such as fixed base operators (FBO), maintenance facilities and flight schools: the SMS requirement “would apply to the entire non-movement area regardless of lease arrangements. There is the potential for an airport to update its airport rules and regulations, revise clauses in lease agreements at their next renewal cycle, and renegotiate lease agreements where appropriate.”

NATA strongly disagrees with the FAA’s vision for SMS in regards to airport tenants. Under this proposal, the FAA firmly inserts the airport operator into a tenant’s business operations. Airport operators would be required to implement safety risk management (SRM) processes in business operations in which the airport operator has little or no experience. While the FAA repeatedly

refers to the ability of the airport operator to scale and adapt SMS to its particular situation, SRM processes require certain mandatory components, including:

Identify safety hazards
Ensure that mitigations are implemented where appropriate to maintain an acceptable level of safety
Provide for regular assessment of the safety level achieved
Aim to make continuous improvement to the airport’s overall level of safety
Establish and maintain a process for formally documenting identified hazards, their associated analyses, and management’s acceptance of the associated risks

Fulfillment of these basic requirements would require a significant change in the airport operator / tenant business relationship. The airport sponsor would need to become an integral participant in the business’s day-to-day activities, monitoring safety and evaluating risks. Any change in the business’s operational model, procedures or policies would need to be evaluated by the airport prior to being instituted. If, in the airport’s sole determination, a proposed change, such as staffing levels, is determined to present a risk, the airport could prohibit that change. In the SRM process conducted upon airport-owned and operated areas, such as the movement area, the determination of final risk for any given hazard, mitigation, or implementation of mitigation would be left to the discretion of the certificate holder. Tenant business would not receive the same discretion; rather, they would be required to submit to the airport operator’s decisions. Airport operators, since they would most likely pass on the cost of mitigation to the tenant business, would be far more likely to determine that a hazard represented a risk in need of mitigation, and then outline mitigation implementation for the tenant to ensure the airport did not take on additional liability. The purpose of an SMS is to elevate safety concerns to the equivalent of any other process a business must manage. This proposal will require airports to make ongoing executive level business decisions for airport tenant businesses. The businesses that operate our nation’s FBOs, maintenance facilities, and flight schools are the experts best placed to ensure, and incentivized to ensure, the safety of their own operations. Replacing that authority with that of the airport operator is likely to reduce safety and create excess burden on the airport tenant.

NATA recommends that this rulemaking be modified to exempt from the airport’s SMS oversight areas exclusively leased for use to tenant businesses.

Regulatory Authority of SMS Rule
The FAA has clearly stated that enforcement of this proposed rule will be limited to “an evaluation of whether a certificate holder’s SMS is functioning as it is intended to function rather than as a means to second guess a certificate holder’s decisions.” NATA applauds the FAA for this approach. Without that commitment, a regulatory SMS standard becomes little more than a new rulemaking process that allows the implementation of regulatory requirements that bypasses the protections contained in the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and numerous Executive Orders. While NATA is pleased to see the FAA’s commitment to a process-related enforcement scheme, we believe that that structure should be formalized in the regulatory changes made to Part 139.

NATA recommends that the text of the regulatory changes be modified to state specifically that a certificate holder is only required to implement risk mitigation if failure to do so would result in a violation of some other provision of Part 139 or other federal regulation. NATA believes that failure to do so could result in situations that violate existing federal law, procedure and policy.

Approval

With this rulemaking, the FAA has required that each Part 139 certificate holder “must develop and maintain an Airport Safety Management System that is approved by the Administrator.” The FAA has also stated that its enforcement mechanism will serve to ensure that “a certificate holder’s SMS is functioning as it is intended to function rather than as a means to second guess a certificate holder’s decisions.” In light of the FAA commitment to ensure that this proposed rule remains flexible and scalable, NATA questions the need for an approved document. The FAA’s concern is that a certificate holder has an SMS and that that SMS contains the required components.

NATA believes that the airport SMSs should be an accepted rather than an approved document.

Inspector Guidance and Training
Whether intended for airports or air carriers, one of the industry’s greatest concerns with SMS as a regulatory standard is the ability for the requirement to morph into a process by which new regulatory requirements are implemented. The FAA has stated that enforcement will be targeted at ensuring a certificate holders program is functioning, not at second guessing the certificate holders decisions. Key to implementing that policy will be the training and guidance provided to Airport Certification Safety Inspectors (ACSI). Without proper training and guidance to ACSI, the FAA’s policy on enforcement could quickly change into one of second guessing decisions made by airports.

NATA requests that industry be briefed on and allowed ample opportunity to comment on ACSI training programs and guidance relating to airports SMS.

Closing

NATA supports the FAA’s efforts to enhance aircraft and airport safety. While NATA fully supports SMS implementation as a voluntary measure, we do believe that regulatory implementation of SMS presents some serious challenges. NATA submits these comments to assist the FAA in overcoming these challenges and looks forward to working with the agency to advance aviation safety.

Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

2011 Air Charter Summit Highlights Key Issues Affecting Community

Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:17:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

2011 AIR CHARTER SUMMIT HIGHLIGHTS KEY ISSUES AFFECTING COMMUNITY

Alexandria, VA, June 8, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) concluded its popular Air Charter Summit this week. The Air Charter Summit is the Part 135 on-demand air charter industry's most popular event with its wide array of business, regulatory and legislative topics on issues affecting the aviation community at-large. This year's summit included a robust agenda with issues that touched on all facets of the Part 135 and fractional program management communities, including charter brokering, Transportation Security Administration updates, audit standards, combating drug trafficking, frequently issued Part 135 violations and the Twelve-Five Standard Security Program. Popular sessions featured advice on how to protect your business against clawbacks in bankruptcy proceedings and a forum with the FAA Part 135 Branch.

Other Summit Highlights:

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Assistant Special Agent Charge Patrick Arata opened the summit with an overview of DEA and recent activities. Arata discussed possible indicators of drug trafficking, including modified tail numbers, blocked-out windows and recent paint jobs, as well as sound methods for operators to follow such as checking the no fly list, employing best practices for using brokers, being suspicious of one-way flights and being cautious of cash payments.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Director of Flight Standards Service John Allen’s FAA regulatory report included an update on flight, duty and rest regulations. Allen said that the FAA is working through public comments on the Part 121 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in order to publish a final rule by the July 31 deadline. He also said that it is likely that future rulemaking efforts will propose extending the Part 121 rule to Part 135. NATA President James K. Coyne emphasized the inconsistency in flight, duty and rest time for pilots vs. air traffic controllers. He said that Part 121 is vastly different from Part 135 and thus on-demand air charter flights should be regulated differently. Allen mentioned that the pilot certificate and qualifications aviation rulemaking committee completed its work in November and that there will be issues of interest to the Part 135 industry on which they strongly urge NATA members to comment.
In the Most Frequently Issued FAA Part 135 Violations session, Joseph Conte of the FAA’s Office of the Chief Counsel—Enforcement and Paul Lange of The Law Offices of Paul A. Lange outlined common mistakes made by operators, including improper drug and alcohol testing procedures, making excuses that make the enforcement issues worse, poor recordkeeping and reading safety rules out of context. They also gave advice on how to avoid problems such as paying close attention to detail, implementing proper drug and alcohol testing procedures, instituting voluntary disclosure reporting programs, auditing/testing systems and always questioning if there is anything else that the operator can do to ensure compliance.
The forum with the FAA Part 135 Operations Branch featured a lively question and answer period regarding topics such as pilot training/checking credits, the use of technology such as iPads, and flight, duty and rest rulemaking. Many questions were raised regarding pilot training credit and what qualifies a pilot as trained on an operator’s specific program. (Watch for an article addressing this topic in an upcoming issue of the Aviation Business Journal.)
The 2011 Air Charter Summit also helped NATA and McFarren Aviation Consulting highlight their support of the Veteran’s Airlift Command (VAC). NATA and McFarren Aviation Consulting pledged $10 each per attendee with a combined minimum of $5,000 in addition to money and other contributions by NATA members and summit attendees. The VAC is a charitable organization that provides free air transportation to wounded warriors, veterans and their families for medical and other compassionate purposes. Thousands of dollars were raised through this effort, but much more can be done to help support wounded warriors. Visit www.nata.aero/acs to find out how you can contribute funds, donate unused card member or fractional share flight hours or give a corporate gift of flight hours.
Key players within the audit community assembled to discuss the continuing confusion with the various audits and its impact on Part 135 on-demand air charter operators. During the session, operators continued to express clear concern with the large number of audits that still exist and the importance of coalescing around one audit standard.
Transportation Security Administration Deputy Assistant Administrator for Transportation Sector Network Management Douglas Hofsass provided a detailed overview of the latest security developments affecting the Part 135 community, including the supplemental Large Aircraft Security Program (LASP) rulemaking, Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) and airport badging. Hofsass indicated that the supplemental LASP rule has moved out of the TSA and is now being reviewed by the leadership of the Department of Homeland Security.
U.S. Department of Transportation Principal Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Office of Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings, Dayton Lehman and Kent Jackson of Jackson & Wade, LLC highlighted the latest activity on charter brokering oversight, some recent enforcement actions and pending rulemaking related to brokering.

NATA’s Coyne said, "The solid turnout at this year’s Air Charter Summit illustrates an engaged and active Part 135 community. There is no shortage of issues facing Part 135 and NATA’s Air Charter Summit is the premier event to increase awareness of the existence of these issues and where they stand, provide a forum for discussion and present resources to address questions and challenges.”

“I am especially pleased that a portion of the proceeds of this year’s summit will help support the work of the Veteran’s Airlift Command. I encourage everyone to visit www.nata.aero/acs to find out how they can continue to contribute to this noble and worthy cause,” concluded Coyne.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

"Coyne's Video Briefings" Highlights Important Issues Confronting NATA Member Companies

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:54:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282

“COYNE’S VIDEO BRIEFINGS” HIGHLIGHTS IMPORTANT ISSUES CONFRONTING NATA MEMBER COMPANIES

Alexandria, VA, November 9, 2009 — Today, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) unveiled the first video in an ongoing series featuring NATA President James K. Coyne called “Coyne’s Video Briefings.” A new video will be released every few weeks and will focus on “hot topics” and important current events affecting the association’s membership and the general aviation industry at-large.

The first briefing, titled “Fiscal Crisis,” focuses on the current economic climate facing the general aviation industry and contains a brief cameo appearance by U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).

“These video briefings allow me to speak directly to our members on current political and financial issues affecting their companies,” Coyne stated. “I will also be able to provide some candid perspective as to how these issues impact the bottom line of aviation businesses and what actions our members can take to ensure that their companies are protected from new taxes and unnecessary regulations.”

“In recent weeks, NATA has become aggressive in creating a number of different resources for our members to learn more about what NATA is doing for them,” Coyne said. “We believe that these new video briefings will complement our efforts in creating the NATA President’s Capitol View Blog and the Inside Washington Blog along with joining Twitter, Facebook and other social media networks.

To view “Fiscal Crisis,” please click here.

To view the catalog of Coyne’s Video Briefings, please click here.

Click here to view this release in PDF format.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Coyne Praises New Hampshire Proclamation

Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:43:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer

Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs

800-808-6282

ebyer@nata.aero

COYNE PRAISES NEW HAMPSHIRE PROCLAMATION

Alexandria, VA, March 17, 2011 — Yesterday, the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) joined the Alliance for Aviation Across America in Concord, New Hampshire, where Governor John Lynch announced a statewide proclamation recognizing March as General Aviation Month.

The proclamation highlights the economic value of general aviation by stating that the industry supports 8,000 jobs and contributes $639 million to the state. New Hampshire is home to 11 charter flight companies, 23 repair stations, 17 fixed-base operators and numerous flight schools.

“NATA applauds Governor Lynch for recognizing the value of aviation business in the state of New Hampshire,” said NATA President James K. Coyne.

“We commend Governor Lynch for his proclamation highlighting the importance of general aviation to New Hampshire," stated Alliance for Aviation Across America Executive Director Selena Shilad. "General aviation is a critical lifeline for businesses, law enforcement, charities, medical organizations, and farmers across Hew Hampshire and the entire United States." To view the Alliance press release, please click here.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Legislation Introduced To Reduce Unfair Government Competition

Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:42:00 GMT

ACTION CALL

LEGISLATION INTRODUCED TO REDUCE UNFAIR GOVERNMENT COMPETITION

April 15, 2011

What’s at Issue
U.S. Representative John Duncan (R-TN) and U.S. Senator John Thune (R-SD) introduced legislation, the Freedom from Government Competition Act (and H.R. 1474 and S. 785, respectively) to reduce unfair government competition with the private sector, including small business. NATA members are being asked to contact their Members of Congress to request they co-sponsor this legislation. The more co-sponsors the bill has, the more likely it will be taken up by Congress.

Why It’s Important
H.R. 1474/S.785 seeks to end government monopolies and benefit taxpayers by subjecting commercial activities being performed by federal employees within government agencies to market competition. Not only do federal agencies duplicate the services of private business, but many engage in unfair competition with the private sector. Eliminating this duplicative effort could save the federal government as much as $27 billion annually, and help job creation in the private sector.

What to Do
Contact your Members of Congress in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate today and request they support H.R. 1474/S.785 by becoming a co-sponsor. NATA’s Legislative Action Center provides association members a quick, easy way to email letters directly to their Member of Congress.

NATA Position
NATA members have continuously experienced government competition in the form of airport operators competing with private business. Congress must recognize the right of private businesses to have the first option in providing services at airports, and should ensure that airport authorities seeking to provide these same services are not granted an unfair advantage due to their government status.

Status
H.R. 1474 has been referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Joining Congressman Duncan as original cosponsors were Reps. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), House Small Business Committee Chairman Sam Graves (R-MO), Richard Hanna (R-NY), Vicky Hartzler (R-MO), Steven LaTourette (R-OH), Donald Manzullo (R-IL), David McKinley (R-WV), Dennis Ross (R-FL), Pete Sessions (R-TX), Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA), and Don Young (R-AK).

S. 785 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Sens. John Barrasso (R-WY), James Inhofe (R-OK), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), and Pat Roberts (R-KS) are original cosponsors on S. 785.

Staff Contact:
Kristen Moore
Director, Legislative Affairs
kmoore@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA Joins In Letter to Administrator Pistole Concerning TFRs

Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:22:00 GMT

June 2, 2011

The Honorable John S. Pistole
Administrator
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
East Building, 601 South Street
Arlington, VA 20598

Dear Administrator Pistole:

We appreciate your leadership at TSA and your willingness to work with industry to meet needed security requirements while finding ways to address the legitimate operational and economic needs of industry. With this strong record in mind, we write to ask that TSA work with industry to minimize the impact of temporary flight restrictions (TFR) created to support presidential travel on general aviation businesses. This has been a continuing issue and we believe that we now are at a stage where practical and pragmatic steps can be identified to improve TFR design and implementation without in any way compromising the security of the President.

As you know, TFRs, which are one of the tools used to protect the President, create a direct economic impact through loss of revenue for aviation businesses including fixed based operators (FBO), corporate flight departments, on-demand air charter operators, maintenance facilities, flight schools, helicopter and heliport operators. For instance, an FBO at Chicago Midway Airport loses an average of $60,000 in revenue daily when the President visits the Chicago area due to a TFR. Also helicopter air tour operators in Hawaii and Las Vegas experience losses in excess of $ 150,000 during each Presidential visit. However, there are ways to mitigate this impact and TSA worked successfully with our industry last summer to facilitate flight operations around Martha’s Vineyard. We applaud these steps taken by the TSA in cooperation with industry and other agencies.

Given this precedent, we request that the Department of Homeland Security develop procedures, with industry consultation, that would allow aviation businesses and operators to continue operating near normal levels but address the security needs necessary to protect the President during travel. As an example, aircraft operators that comply with the DCA Access Standard Security Program (DASSP) provide a unique opportunity to improve operational access while maintaining the required level of security for the President. Already today, the DASSP allows qualified operators to conduct flights to and from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

Craig Fuller
President & CEO
AOPA

Rod Hightower
President & CEO
EAA

Pete Bunce
President & CEO
GAMA

Matthew S. Zuccaro
President
HAI

James K. Coyne
President & CEO
NATA

Ed Bolen
President & CEO
NBAA

Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Lawsuit Over Avgas Ignores Efforts Underway Or Already Completed

Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:52:00 GMT

GA Avgas Coalition: Threatened Lawsuit Over Avgas Ignores Extensive Efforts Underway or Already Completed

A threatened lawsuit by the environmental group Friends of the Earth against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would pit the as-yet unquantified hazards of lead from aviation gasoline (avgas) against the known safety risk to pilots and passengers of removing lead used in piston-powered (non-turbine) aircraft fuel. The threatened suit, alleging inaction on the part of the agency, would ignore extensive work underway or done by the EPA, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the general aviation industry, and the fuels industry.

The General Aviation Avgas Coalition, made up of aviation and petroleum industry organizations, anticipated this development even while hoping to avoid it. The threatened lawsuit would ask a court to compel EPA to respond to a 2006 petition submitted by Friends of the Earth. That petition asks EPA to make a so-called "endangerment" finding for leaded avgas. Such a finding would trigger a multi-step regulatory process that could reduce or eliminate tetraethyl lead from aviation gasoline – a regulatory process that will take years and must consider aircraft safety. In any event, EPA is already an active participant in regulatory efforts aimed at developing a safe alternative to leaded avgas.

Simply put, lead remains in avgas to keep the people aboard piston-engine aircraft safe – it keeps those engines from ripping themselves apart in flight. Despite some 40 years of research since the passage of the Clean Air Act, no safe alternative has been identified. But the industry continues working toward an unleaded future.

Early this year, acting on a request from the GA Avgas Coalition, the FAA – the agency with responsibility for the certification and continued safety of general aviation aircraft –established the Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee (UAT ARC). The ARC is a joint government/industry committee tasked with identifying key issues relating to and providing recommendations for the development and deployment of an unleaded avgas. The Friends of the Earth were invited to participate on the ARC to be a part of the effort to work towards an unleaded future, but chose not to participate.

The EPA, in addition to being an active participant in the ARC, has taken a number of actions. Last year, the agency issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR), acknowledging the need for more information about the issue and asking a series of pertinent questions, to which the industry filed substantial comments. In 2008, the EPA also lowered the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for lead by a factor of 10. In a subsequent notice, the EPA also established a new criteria for lead monitoring and added a requirement for specific monitoring at 15 airports. EPA also has recently begun a process to review the recently-revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards for lead.

Shortly after the passage of the Clean Air Act in 1970, the industry as a whole took a significant step, reducing lead emissions by 50% by moving to a low-lead fuel. Now, as an interim step toward an unleaded fuel, the industry is developing a very-low-lead standard that would further reduce the already small amount of lead remaining in the fuel by an additional 20%. Meanwhile, at least two companies – both of which are members of and participating in the UAT ARC – are continuing to make progress testing and evaluating unleaded fuels that may work as a replacement.

The Friends of the Earth filing notes that some argue in favor of using unleaded automotive gasoline instead of avgas. Automotive gasoline is approved for use in only a portion of the general aviation fleet and faces a number of significant issues. These issues include, but are not limited to, the economic challenge of developing a second fuel infrastructure to serve a limited market, and the growing difficulty of finding fuel not blended with ethanol. Congress has mandated the blending of renewable fuels such as ethanol into automotive gasoline. Given the mandated volume of renewable fuels that must be used and the amount of automotive gasoline American drivers consumed last year, virtually all automotive gasoline produced must be blended. And Congress has shown no interest in creating a niche for unblended automotive gas.

While the notice by the Friends of the Earth asks the EPA to begin a process that may result in establish lead emission standards for avgas, GA pilots should rest assured that any new standards are years away from implementation and do not affect current or near-term availability of avgas. Further, the GA Avgas Coalition continues to support the efforts of the FAA’s Unleaded Avgas Transition ARC. With the participation of the FAA, EPA, petroleum industry, engine and airframe manufacturers, fuel developers, and consumer representatives, this remains the right path to finding an unleaded solution that is technically and economically feasible while maintaining the safety and utility of the general aviation fleet.

Click here for more information.

Mississippi House Declares May 'GA Appreciation Month'

Tue, 24 May 2011 14:20:00 GMT

Mississippi House Declares May 'GA Appreciation Month'
May 24, 2011

National Aviation Organizations Welcome Proclamation

National aviation organizations on Monday welcomed Mississippi House of Representatives' declaration of May as "General Aviation Appreciation Month." General aviation in Mississippi alone generates about $860 million in economic impact annually, supporting over 1,563 jobs.

"We commend the Mississippi House of Representatives for recognizing the vital economic impact general aviation has across Mississippi," Selena Shilad, Executive Director of the Alliance for Aviation Across America, commented. "The General aviation industry provides essential services to local businesses, charities, medical organizations, law enforcement, and farmers throughout Mississippi and the entire country.

"In Mississippi and across the United States, the business aviation community is a driving force of local businesses, communities and economies. We thank the Mississippi House of Representatives for its recognition of all general aviation, including business aviation, and the impact that this industry has on their communities," said National Business Aviation Association President and CEO Ed Bolen. "Across the United States, the industry provides 1.2 million jobs and $150 billion in economic impact. As a valuable economic tool, this proclamation emphasizes the immense role of this industry and other issues important to business aviation."

Henry Ogrodzinski, President of the National Association of State Aviation Officials said, "Local airports are the lifeblood of our communities all across the country. They provide good jobs to millions of hard-working people, and make it possible for local business to expand and access essential services while remaining a part of the community. This proclamation signifies the pivotal value of general aviation in the state of Mississippi. We welcome the signing of this proclamation and look forward in continuing to work with the Mississippi State Legislature, Aeronautics Division Director Thomas M. Booth Jr. and in the future with Governor Barbour.

James K. Coyne, President and CEO of the National Air Transportation Association (NATA), stated "We applaud the Mississippi House of Representatives for this proclamation recognizing 'General Aviation Appreciation Month.' The proclamation from the Mississippi State Legislature is yet another positive step in highlighting the critical importance of the general aviation industry for our economy and our nation as a whole."

"Across the United States, helicopters are utilized to provide lifesaving services to our communities, along with many other vital missions conducted on behalf of the greater good," said Matthew Zuccaro, President of Helicopter Association International (HAI). "We welcome the proclamation by the Mississippi House of Representatives, and look forward to working with them to further highlight the tremendous economic and operational benefits of helicopters and general aviation throughout their state."

"Mississippi is home to more than 6,830 pilots and 3,178 general aviation aircraft. With 79 airports across the state, general aviation is a significant engine of economic growth for local communities throughout the state," said AOPA President and CEO Craig L. Fuller. "We appreciate the Mississippi House of Representatives' recognition of the importance of general aviation and the economic benefits it provides their communities, and look forward to working with state and local officials to continue to raise awareness of general aviation."

http://aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=bf99f9c4-ae04-43b4-abba-60807b5e8fcd&

Click here for more information.

NATA Welcomes Selection of Thune As Ranking Member On Senate Subcommittee On Aviation Operations, Safety & Security

Thu, 19 May 2011 12:46:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA WELCOMES SELECTION OF THUNE AS RANKING MEMBER ON
SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AVIATION OPERATIONS, SAFETY & SECURITY

Alexandria, VA, May 19, 2011 — Yesterday, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, announced new minority subcommittee ranking member assignments for the 112th Congress. Included in this announcement was the selection of Senator John Thune (R-SD) as the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety and Security.

“Senator Thune has long been a supporter of the general aviation industry,” stated NATA President James K. Coyne. “Starting during his time as a Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, NATA has worked closely with the Senator on a variety of issues affecting our membership and the industry at-large.”

Recently, Senator Thune introduced S. 785, the Freedom from Government Competition Act, to reduce unfair government competition with the private sector, including small businesses. NATA members have continuously experienced government competition in the form of airport operators competing with private business.

“Congress must recognize the right of private businesses to have the first option in providing services at airports, and should ensure that airport authorities seeking to provide these same services are not granted an unfair advantage due to their government status,” stated Coyne.

“NATA congratulates Senator Thune on his selection as Ranking Member and looks forward to continuing its long-standing relationship with the Senator in addressing issues important to America’s aviation businesses,” concluded Coyne.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Comments To DOT On: Docket No. FAA–2010–0247, Safety Enhancements Part 139, Certification of Airports

Fri, 13 May 2011 12:15:00 GMT

May 13, 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket No. FAA–2010–0247, Safety Enhancements Part 139,
Certification of Airports

NATA appreciates the opportunity to comment on these proposed regulations. Of the three distinct components of this proposed rule, NATA’s comments are limited to the proposal to require airports certificated under 14 CFR 139 to provide training for individuals with authorized access to the airport non-movement area.

NATA agrees with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) assessment that “non-movement area safety can be improved with increased training.” NATA has long been a proponent of training for line service personnel and others working in the airport non-movement area. NATA’s Safety 1st Professional Line Service Training Program (PLST) is currently utilized by over 300 on-airport businesses to train more than 3,000 employees working in airport movement and non-movement areas. It is our belief that this proposed rule will continue to build upon industry and government efforts to increase airport safety.

Comments

FAA proposes to exempt “Airmen exercising the privileges of an applicable airman certificate” from the requirements to have received non-movement area safety training. NATA concurs with this exemption and believes that the FAA’s intent is to allow an airman to have unescorted access throughout the course of exercising applicable airman privileges and associated tasks. However a strict reading of the regulatory language could lead to interpretations such as: a pilot who has not received safety training may not walk, unescorted, through the non-movement area to get to his or her aircraft, since walking through the non-movement area is not a privilege associated with an airman certificate. NATA believes a simple statement of clarification in the final rule preamble will help to clarify the FAA’s intent.

The FAA proposes to require annual retraining of all individuals with unescorted access to the non-movement area. NATA believes that the costs associated with annual retraining do not justify the small additional benefits from such frequent retraining. NATA, through its own research and development process, has adopted a two-year recertification process for our Safety 1st PLST. Our experience has taught that too frequent retraining on basic tasks not only provides little benefit for the additional cost, it also can lead to a negative attitude towards the training by trainees as they feel forced to repeat “unneeded” training constantly. NATA requests that the FAA adopt a two-year retraining cycle for non-movement training.

The FAA has asked for comments on the Regulatory Flexibility Determination contained within the NPRM. NATA believes that the mitigations provided by the FAA will offset a portion of the cost of this rulemaking. However, NATA also proposes that airports be permitted to accept training meeting the requirements of §139.303 (g)(3) that is provided by tenants to their own employees as sufficient to allow unescorted access to the non-movement area. Many airport tenant businesses already provide training to their own employees that either exceeds, meets or can be easily modified to meet the proposed regulatory requirements. Adopting this proposal will allow airports to take advantage of existing training programs, such as NATA’s Safety 1st PLST, without incurring the cost of providing duplicative training themselves.

NATA appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments and looks forward to continuing to work with the FAA to increase the level of safety and efficiency at our nation’s airports.

Sincerely,

Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs

Click here to view in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA Concerned With Environmental Group's Actions On Avgas

Thu, 12 May 2011 10:48:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA CONCERNED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP'S ACTIONS ON AVGAS

Alexandria, VA, May 12, 2011 — This week, the Center for Environmental Health (CEH), an environmental group located in San Francisco, CA, has charged numerous aviation businesses in California, including aviation fuel suppliers and fixed base operators, with violating California state law for selling aviation gasoline, which contains lead. The notices indicate CEH’s intention to file a lawsuit under state law, and also include a proposed settlement to stop the lawsuit that includes halting the sale of aviation gasoline and payment, to CEH, of 25% of any “civil penalty,” of up to $ 2.7 million, assessed. When asked in a recent AvWeb interview about the revenue received from Proposition 65 lawsuits, CEH Research Director Caroline Cox responded, “We try to recover our legal fees and then perhaps make some money for [our] organization.”

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) is very concerned about this attempt to use California state law to shut down the entire piston-engine general aviation industry in California through a suit that involves a private organization seeking monetary damages. General aviation is a national resource that provides economic growth and jobs in thousands of California communities. This growth and these jobs are now endangered by one organization’s threat of a lawsuit and demands for monetary damages and an end to the sale of leaded aviation gasoline.

Any environmental concerns arising from the sale and use of aviation gasoline belong under the purview of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Currently, both of these agencies, along with numerous industry stakeholders, are engaged in a collaborative process to address the issues arising from the use of leaded aviation gasoline.

“NATA takes environmental concerns very seriously,” said NATA President James K. Coyne, “but a single organization suing for monetary damages cannot be allowed to threaten an entire industry. NATA will continue its cooperative work with the EPA and FAA on addressing the long-term future of aviation gasoline in the United States and will support the general aviation industry in California against this attack.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Avgas Coalition Responds To Threat Of Lawsuit Against California Avgas Suppliers And Retailers

Wed, 11 May 2011 17:38:00 GMT

The Oakland, Calif.-based Center for Environmental Health (CEH) provided notice early this week that it intends to sue 50 fuel retailers and suppliers (including subsidiaries and affiliates) for violating California’s drinking water and toxic enforcement law, based on the suppliers’ distribution of aviation gasoline, which contains a lead additive. The aviation members of the General Aviation Avgas Coalition are exploring all options for supporting the named fuel retailers and suppliers.

Because the National Airspace System belongs to the people of the United States and benefits the entire country, Congress has reserved to the Federal government, through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the right and responsibility to regulate all aviation activities in the U.S. The threatened CEH lawsuit in California raises the specter of a patchwork of state regulations governing fuels pilots may or may not use in their piston-powered aircraft.

Equally important, at the heart of the federal aviation gasoline fuel standard is safety of flight – ensuring that the engine of an aircraft in flight does not suffer a catastrophic failure.

The FAA, the federal agency with oversight for general aviation, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the federal agency with oversight for environmental concerns including aircraft emissions, are working with the general aviation industry – including aircraft and engine manufacturers, fuel producers and developers, and representatives of fuel suppliers and consumers – through the FAA’s Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) to address the transition to an unleaded fuel. The ARC is working through a host of factors, with safety paramount, for transitioning to an unleaded fuel. These include certification, production, and distribution, as well as environmental and economic concerns.

It is imperative that the issues surrounding the safe and effective transition to an unleaded fuel be addressed at the Federal level, and that the FAA and EPA be the agencies that address those concerns.

The potential for this type of legal action at the state level highlights the necessity of FAA leadership, EPA involvement, and industry input to continue the safe transition to a new fuel.

The lead content of aviation gasoline has already been reduced by 50% since the federal Clean Air Act was passed. But even as the general aviation industry works toward an unleaded solution, the Avgas Coalition has taken steps to further reduce the lead content as an interim improvement, developing a Very Low Lead fuel standard that will allow for a further 20 percent reduction in the maximum amount of lead in the fuel without adversely affecting air safety.

Because several of their members are named as potential litigants, petroleum industry representatives to the GA Avgas Coalition did not join aviation industry representatives in issuing this statement.

Click here for more information.

Contact Your State Senator Today In Support Of SB619

Wed, 11 May 2011 12:27:00 GMT

CONTACT YOUR STATE SENATOR TODAY
IN SUPPORT OF SB619

California’s attempts to regulate flight training as private postsecondary education have led to the issuance of rules that threaten to harm flight training providers irreparably. A National Air Transportation Association (NATA) member survey indicated that up to 90% of flight training facilities could be forced to close their doors when these rules take effect for our industry on July 1. But you can prevent that from happening.

NATA, in partnership with the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, has worked to obtain long-term relief from the regulations issued by the California Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education. Currently, California Senate Bill 619 (SB619) contains an exemption from the rules issued by the state for any flight training facility or flight instructor who:

Does not require upfront payment of tuition or fees in exchange for training, and
Does not require students to sign a contract of indebtedness in exchange for training

Students will still be able to purchase “block time” in amounts up to $2500.

SB 619 is expected to be voted on by the full California State Senate this week. Your support is vital to its passage. Without SB 619, all California flight training facilities and flight instructors will become subject to the new regulations on July 1. NATA urges its membership and other interested individuals to contact their State Senator TODAY in support of SB 619.

Click here for contact information for your Senator.

Click here for talking points in support of SB 619.

Please contact your state Senator today and ask them to vote for SB 619.

NATA’s legislative and grassroots efforts in California to find relief for flight training business will continue! You can also help in this fight. Consider making a donation to NATA’s California Flight Training Fund to help offset some of the costs of this ongoing battle.

Staff Contact: Michael France
Director of Regulatory Affairs
mfrance@nata.aero

View in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

NATA And McFarren Aviation Consulting Pledge Funds For Wounded Warriors

Wed, 11 May 2011 09:05:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA AND MCFARREN AVIATION CONSULTING PLEDGE FUNDS FOR WOUNDED WARRIORS

Alexandria, VA, May 10, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) and McFarren Aviation Consulting (MAC) have each pledged to donate to the Veterans Airlift Command (VAC) $10 per attendee of the upcoming NATA Air Charter Summit, to be held June 6-8 at the Westfields Marriott in Virginia. The VAC is a charitable organization that provides free air transportation to wounded warriors, veterans, and their families for medical and other compassionate purposes. NATA and MAC have established a special fund, NATA Wings for Warriors, for NATA members and friends to contribute to the organization.

“We are honored to pledge $10 per Air Charter Summit attendee to VAC. We encourage our members not only to consider making financial donations, but also to offer aircraft and pilots for VAC flights; even a few hours a year would be a gracious contribution to VAC,” said NATA President James K. Coyne.

McFarren Aviation Consulting President Lindsey McFarren said, “Our soldiers and their families are heroes. Supporting VAC is a wonderful way to make a difference in a hero’s life. Make a financial contribution. Donate an aircraft and pilots for a couple of hours a year. Help us provide comfort and peace to our wounded servicemen and women.”

VAC will have a booth at the upcoming NATA Air Charter Summit. Stop by to learn more about this important program!

Visit http://www.veteransairlift.org/m/donate.aspx?campaign=NATAWFW2011 to make a donation!

Visit www.nata.aero/acs for more information on NATA’s Air Charter Summit.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

VIPR Inspections At Part 1542 Commercial Airports Ongoing

Tue, 10 May 2011 11:41:00 GMT

VIPR Inspections At Part 1542 Commercial Airports Ongoing
May 10, 2011

Over the last week, NATA has received reports of a number of visits by Visual Intermodal Prevention and Response (VIPR) teams at Part 1542 commercial airports. These inspections come as a result of enhanced security measures that have taken place around the country in response to the death of Osama Bin Laden.

Recently, NATA crafted a white paper outlining the makeup of these VIPR teams. To view NATA's white paper, please click here.

The purpose of VIPR teams is to "operate throughout the airport environment as an additional layer of security to enhance TSA's ability to prepare for, protect against, or respond to acts of terrorism and to protect persons, facilities, and critical infrastructure in all modes of transportation. VIPR teams are to consult with all transportation entities directly affected by the deployment of VIPR teams, as appropriate, including air carriers, airport operators, local security and law enforcement officials and fixed-base operators."

NATA members who encounter VIPR inspections should contact Eric R. Byer, NATA's vice president of government and industry affairs, at ebyer@nata.aero.

Click here for more information.

Docket No.FAA-2002-11301, Antidrug and Alcohol Misuse Prevention Programs for Personnel Engaged in Specified Aviation Activities; Supplemental Regulatory Flexibility Determination

Tue, 10 May 2011 10:56:00 GMT

May 9, 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.
Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket No.FAA-2002-11301, Antidrug and Alcohol Misuse Prevention Programs for Personnel Engaged in Specified Aviation Activities; Supplemental Regulatory Flexibility Determination

NATA appreciates the opportunity to provide comment on this supplemental regulatory flexibility determination. NATA believes that this proposed regulatory flexibility determination lacks serious analytical rigor, fails to understand fully the diversity and depth of regulated parties and underestimates the costs imposed upon those parties. For those reasons, NATA posits that this proposed determination is materially insufficient to support its finding and should, therefore, be withdrawn until the administration is able to submit a serious analytical document for comment.

Analytical Rigor
NATA asserts that this proposed regulatory flexibility determination is flawed due to its lack of documented and supportable assumptions and conclusions. NATA points to the following issues within the proposed determination:

Over reliance on an unscientific survey – In describing the universe of regulated parties, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has relied heavily upon a member survey conducted by the Aeronautical Repair Station Association (ARSA). The FAA provides no evidence (or even an assertion) that this survey was conducted with the appropriate level of analytical rigor to ensure that the resultant data is representative or even correct. NATA believes that treating an anecdotal survey as a primary source for describing and quantifying regulated parties is unacceptable and may very well represent a violation of the Regulatory Flexibility Act as well as other federal data quality standards and statutes.

General cost and salary assumptions – In determining impact, the FAA utilizes completely unsubstantiated assumptions relating to employee salaries, and supervisor-to-employee and instructor-to-employee ratios. The use of completely unsubstantiated assumptions alone makes the findings of this determination utterly unreliable.

Training and education assumptions – Again, the FAA makes assumptions without providing even an attempt at justification. The FAA has estimated training time required to meet the training standard contained within the rule as well as estimating the cost of establishing an educational program without any support.

Program development and maintenance – In this section, the FAA proposes that the establishment of a testing program will require 16 hours at an employee cost of $21 per hour. The FAA’s analysis of the impact of establishing a drug and alcohol testing program is a mere four sentences long and includes new unsupported assumptions and calculations.

Annual documentation – Again, in this section the FAA submits numerous unsupported cost and time assumptions.

NATA is very concerned with the near flippant approach the FAA has taken in regards to analytical rigor in completing this proposed regulatory flexibility analysis. The FAA’s failure to provide supporting and justifying data has led to the conclusions made in this determination being completely unreliable and useless in determining impact.

Regulated Parties
As outlined in the previous section, the FAA’s description of regulated parties is completely unreliable on data quality concerns alone. However, the FAA further demonstrates that its description of regulated parties is faulty by misclassifying a number of businesses as not ever needing a drug and alcohol program. The classification of the following NAICS codes as never requiring a drug and alcohol program is incorrect:

334511 - Rebuild electro-mechanical switches for aviation use

While the term “rebuild” under FAA definitions is a manufacturer-performed operation and, therefore, not subject to the requirements of the rules under consideration, many non-certified maintenance companies performing “maintenance” of aircraft parts consider their work to be classified as “rebuilding” (general meaning of the term) and, therefore, fall under this NAICS code and the FAA’s requirement to establish a drug and alcohol testing program.

541380 - Hydrostatic testing

A drug and alcohol testing program is required if operations performed under this NAICS code are performed as “maintenance” of an aircraft.

541380 – Inspection

A drug and alcohol testing program is required if operations performed under this NAICS code are performed as “maintenance” of an aircraft.

541380 - Non-destructive testing

A drug and alcohol testing program is required if operations performed under this NAICS code are performed as “maintenance” of an aircraft.

811310 - Precision grinding and testing of various fuel & hydraulic/pneumatic valve assemblies

A drug and alcohol testing program is required if operations performed under this NAICS code are performed as “maintenance” of an aircraft.

In addition to misclassifying a number of the NAICS codes, the FAA’s reliance upon the ARSA survey and the agency’s failure to conduct its own analysis of affected parties has led to other non-certified maintenance providers not being included as subcontractors. NATA members have pointed out that cabin entertainment repair facilities are not listed as a regulated party despite the fact that they are required to have a drug and alcohol testing program if they are performing maintenance.¹

Impact Analysis
In one calculation relating to impact, the FAA attempts to quantify cost on an employer when employees are taken from their jobs to perform the required testing and training under this rule. The FAA simply multiplies the employees’ computed (and unsupported) salary costs by the amount of estimated time for completing the task to find cost. This method fails to account for the majority of cost to the business. Employee maintenance labor is a fixed asset, every minute that an employee is required by regulation to be away from their assigned duties is lost labor revenue for their employer. Regulations that require maintenance personnel to spend time on other non-maintenance duties, such as testing and related training, reduces the number of billable labor hours that employees may perform in a given year and thus reduces the employer’s revenue. To monetize the impact upon a regulated party accurately, the FAA must account for the reduced revenue experienced by the employer rather than just the costs of employing an individual while he or she is undergoing testing and training.

Additionally the FAA completely fails to account for the costs associated with reduced availability of contractors and subcontractors due to the testing requirements.

Real world experience between the implementation of this rule and the FAA’s release of this supplemental regulatory flexibility analysis has shown that one of the greatest costs borne by regulated entities is the reduction of availability of contractor and subcontractor services. As local facilities choose not to perform aircraft and aircraft parts maintenance due to the drug and alcohol testing and training requirements, regulated parties are forced to ship work to non-local facilities, thus incurring shipping and delay costs. The FAA’s delay in releasing this determination puts the agency in the rare position of having actual impact data available to it for development of an accurate impact analysis. However, the FAA chose to rely on purely hypothetical calculations. NATA believes that federal requirements on data quality require the FAA to use the highest quality data that is reasonably available when making regulatory flexibility determinations. In this case, actual compliance data is available but the FAA made no effort to obtain that data.

Conclusion
NATA is concerned that the FAA has not given this regulatory flexibility determination the scrutiny and analytical rigor it deserves. NATA concurs with the FAA that the safety benefits of a drug and alcohol training and testing program are important but also believes that a comprehensive regulatory flexibility determination and analysis is vital. This determination falls well short of all established federal standards for data quality and is, therefore, an inadequate certification that the examined rules do not have a significant economic impact. NATA asks that the FAA withdraw this proposed determination and republish, as soon as practical, a comprehensive analysis that meets basic data quality and analytical rigor requirements. NATA further requests that the FAA use, as a basis for its determination, actual compliance cost data, since that will provide the best measure of economic cost.

Respectfully,

Michael France
Director, Regulatory Affairs

¹ It should be noted the FAA’s failure to grasp fully those regulated by the rule under consideration in this determination extends to the promulgation of the rule itself, whereby the FAA stated that it did not believe that cabin entertainment repair facilities would be required to maintain a drug and alcohol testing program. In actual practice, the FAA is requiring just that.

Click here to view comments in PDF format.

Click here for more information.

Association Issues New, Comprehensive Fact Book

Thu, 05 May 2011 13:11:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

Association Issues New, Comprehensive Fact Book

Alexandria, VA, May 5, 2011 — NATA has released its new fact book entitled, General Aviation in the United States. The new and improved fact book features member testimonials on a wide array of NATA’s products and services and serves as a fantastic educational tool for the association’s Day on the Hill event today.

General Aviation in the United States provides an in-depth review of the NATA membership segments as well as other important components of the general aviation and airline services industry. This handy reference also contains information on a number of U.S. government agencies that affect the day-to-day operation of aviation businesses, and features several charts containing vital general aviation and business aviation statistics on fuel consumption, fractional ownership companies, active pilots, airports, and much more.

This new fact book is free-of-charge and can be downloaded by clicking here.

“Our new fact book really serves as a great foundation to learn about General Aviation and the aviation service business that help it take flight,” stated NATA president James K. Coyne. “I encourage all of our members to utilize this document when educating local, state and federal political leaders as well as local airport boards on the importance and value of aviation businesses.”

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

Federal Government Shutdown: Key Facts

Thu, 05 May 2011 13:11:00 GMT

As Congressional leaders and the White House continue to negotiate in order to avoid a shutdown of the federal government at midnight tonight, NATA has compiled some general facts about what a shutdown of the federal government would mean to its member companies. Should you have questions, please contact Eric Byer.

Federal Government Shutdown: Key Facts

Federal employees deemed non-essential, in other words those whose jobs don’t involve keeping the nation safe and operational, will be furloughed until Congress reaches an agreement on funding the federal government.

“Essential” federal employees who work through the shutdown will not be paid until the government is up and running again. Each agency decides who these essential employees are, such as border patrol agents, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees, and Air Traffic Controllers, who will continue working.

Military operations do not cease. However, troops will not get paid until the government reopens.

Veterans will receive benefits, as the money to fund Veterans Affairs services is set aside a year in advance.

Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security beneficiaries would continue to receive payments.

The Internal Revenue Service would have to suspend tax audits, but the April tax deadline will remain unchanged. The paper processing of tax refunds will be halted during the shutdown.

Government Web sites would stop updating information, and many White House staff members would be sent home.

Federal small-business loans would cease.

Click here for more information.

NATA Hill Event Draws Large Audience And Attention To Legislative Agenda

Thu, 05 May 2011 13:10:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government & Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA Hill Event Draws Large Audience And Attention To Legislative Agenda

Alexandria, VA, May 5, 2011 — This morning, NATA members blanketed Capitol Hill to push the association’s legislative agenda. Nearly 100 NATA member company representatives met with more than 150 Members of Congress and staff to discuss a wide array of federal, state and local issues, including FAA Reauthorization and the Freedom from Government Competition Act.

NATA’s talking point papers can be reviewed at the links below:

Day on the Hill participants began the day’s events with a preparatory breakfast that included feature speaker Senator Mike Johanns (R-NE), Co-Chair of the Senate General Aviation Caucus, and then dispersed for meetings with their congressional representatives. Those meetings enabled the association’s members to discuss with their Members of Congress issues critical to the future success of their businesses and, ultimately, to the economy of the country.

"Participation in the Day on the Hill has been rewarding personally and professionally, and is an easy way to get in front of your Congressional representatives and Senators. The NATA staff gives you the tools and sets up the appointments - you just need to deliver the message and let your representative put a face on General Aviation," said NATA member Ted Hamilton of Landmark Aviation.

"These meetings are simply invaluable when it comes to the message our members can make with their Congressional representatives on important issues facing our industry,” said NATA President James K. Coyne. “As I do every year, I challenge our members to continue communications throughout the year to develop a firm relationship with their representative and thus a solid foundation for our industry.”

Last evening, attendees toasted the industry's finest at NATA's annual Industry Excellence Awards dinner and presentation. Click here to view a press release of the winners, including top honors recipients Pat Epps, President of Epps Aviation and James C. Christiansen, Vice President, Sales, Central U.S., Hawker Beechcraft Corporation.

The Day on the Hill event included NATA's spring committee meetings as well as the annual member meeting in which three new members of the NATA Board of Directors were elected. Click here to view the press release of the appointment of Michael Scheeringa, President of Signature Flight Support, Marian Epps, Chief Financial Officer of Epps Aviation and Ed Kilkeary, CEO and President of L.J. Aviation.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before Congress and the federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Appoints New Board Of Directors Members

Wed, 04 May 2011 20:37:00 GMT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Eric R. Byer
Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs
800-808-6282
ebyer@nata.aero

NATA APPOINTS THREE NEW BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERS

Alexandria, VA, May 4, 2011 — The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) elected three new members to its board of directors today at its annual membership meeting. The new members are S. Michael Scheeringa, president, Signature Flight Support, Marian Epps, chief financial officer, Epps Aviation, and Ed Kilkeary, Sr., founder and CEO, L.J. Aviation.

Michael Scheeringa is the president of Signature Flight Support and is responsible for Signature Flight Support’s more than 100 fixed base operations. Michael’s background includes commercial and general aviation. Before joining Signature, Michael was chief executive officer of Flight Options, which was the world's second largest operator of business jets. Prior to that, he spent 13 years at US Airways, held officer-level positions, and had the oversight of several of the company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. Michael earned a degree in transportation and logistics management from Arizona State University.

Click here to read Michael Scheeringa’s full bio.

Marian Epps is CFO of Epps Aviation, an FBO based at Dekalb Peachtree Airport in Atlanta, GA. A graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology, Marian earned a B.S. Industrial Management degree with a certificate in Technical and Business Communications.

At the age of 14, Marian soloed a glider; at 16, she soloed a “real” plane; and obtained her pilot’s license at 17. After graduation from Georgia Tech, Marian spent 10 years working in the securities industry for such leading financial services firms as Merrill Lynch and Smith Barney and earning her Series 7, Series 63 and Certified Financial Planner designation from 1994-1999.

After gaining experience outside the family business, she returned to Atlanta in 1993 to join Epps Aviation in a marketing role. In 1995, she was promoted to the position of CFO and elected to the board of directors in 2007. She manages accounting operations and information technology, and oversees charter, aircraft management, and Pilatus aircraft sales while building relationships with key customers, vendors and suppliers.

Click here to read Marian Epps’ full bio.

A career in aviation began for L.J. Aviation CEO and President Ed Kilkeary, Sr. in the most dramatic way possible -- as a helicopter crewmember in Vietnam. Returning to Latrobe, PA, after combat, Ed Sr. parlayed his skill of flying and love of aeronautics into L.J. Aviation, named, appropriately enough, for the plane that launched his civilian career – the Lear Jet. With the same precision, tenacity and focus that made him an exceptional pilot, Ed Sr. founded the company in 1980 and built L.J. Aviation into one of the top charter and aircraft management companies in the country.

L.J Aviation is truly a family-owned and operated business. Ed Sr., his wife, five children and an extended family of more than 125 employees manage a fleet of 31 multi-purpose aircraft (including large, medium and light jets, turbo-props and helicopters), as well as service clients throughout the Mid-Atlantic region with base operations in nine locations nation-wide, including Latrobe and Pittsburgh. Ed Sr. personally holds 11 type ratings and an ATP in both helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft, and has logged over 24,000 flight hours to date.

This year, L.J. Aviation proudly celebrates its 30th anniversary and the passionate vision of Ed, Sr. After three decades of service to its customers and community, L.J. Aviation remains synonymous with high quality and dedicated to an enduring tradition of excellence in all the company does.

Click here to read Ed Kilkeary’s full bio.

“NATA’s Board of Directors comprises the finest leaders representing all areas of general aviation,” said NATA President James K. Coyne. “The association will benefit tremendously from the vast experience of Michael, Marian and Ed. We appreciate their support and commitment in joining the NATA Board of Directors.”

Click here to view the full list of the NATA Board of Directors.

# # #

NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.

Click here for more information.

NATA Press Release RSS Feed

Pompeo Introduces Legislation To Help Revitalize General Aviation

NATA Holds Breakthrough Meeting with IRS on Federal Excise Tax Issue

Contract Towers to Stay Open

Action Call - Save the Contract Tower Program

Membership Update - Congress Approves Bill To End FAA Furloughs of Air Traffic Controllers

NATF Announces Scholarship Recipients

NATA Applauds Senate On Sequestration Fix

NATA Holds Inaugural Aviation Business and Legislative Conference

NATA Names James P. Miller Distinguished Service Award Recipient

NATA Elects Three New Board of Directors Members and Announces Leadership

Letter to IRS

FCC Rulemaking on Emergency Locator Transmitters

APP Jet Center Hayward First to Complete NATA Safety 1st Ground Audit

NATA Continues Battling for Small Businesses Against User Fee Proposal

NATA Disappointed in President's Budget Proposal

FAA Delays Tower Closure Date

NATA Announces Recipients of the 2013 AMT Employer Recognition Awards

Bruce Whitman Recipient of NATA's Ong Memorial Award

NATA Wings for Warriors

NATA Announces Industry Excellence Awards Recipients

NATA Updates Member Committee Structure

FAA Releases Contract Tower Closure List

Federal Excise Tax Working Group Update

Moran Amendment Blocked: Contract Tower Closures Imminent

Membership Update - Contract Tower Program

Membership Update - Contract Tower Program

Letter to Senator Moran in Support of Amendment to Continuing Resolution

Support the Moran Amendment to the Continuing Resolution

Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program

Action Call Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program

Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program - Call Your Senators Today

Membership Update - Potential Cuts in FAA Programs

Membership Update - Sequestration

Potential Cuts in FAA Programs

NATA Commends Fuller's Contributions to Industry

FBO Success Seminar: Spring Training Event

NATA Releases 2013 Event Schedule

NATA Comments on OSHA Regulations For Aircraft Cabin Crewmembers

NATA Offers Online Training for Flight Coordinators

NATA Applauds Selection of Rep. LoBiondo as Chairman of Aviation Subcommittee

NATA Adds Line Service Supervisor Training To Its Online Offerings

NATA Congratulates Senate on the Confirmation of Huerta as FAA Administrator

NATF Announces Richard L. Taylor Flight Training Scholarship

NATA Strongly Urges the Confirmation of Huerta as FAA Administrator

Air Carrier Contract Maintenance Requirements

FAA Issues Final Rule Allowing Pilots to Update Naviational Databases

NATA Comments on Repair Stations NPRM

O'Keefe and Key Government Officials Featured at NATA Aviation Business Roundtable

NATA Announces Two Key Staff Changes

NATA Comments on FAA Portable Electronic Device Policy

Candidates Need to Focus on General Aviation Benefits

NATA Announces New Workers' Compensation Insurance Program to Start January 1, 2013

Epps Addresses Detrimental Impact of User Fees at Congressional Hearing

NATA Comments On FAA Through-the-Fence Policy

GA Avgas Coalition Applauds FAA's Creation of Avgas Fuels Program Office

New NATA Workers' Compensation Insurance Program

NATA Presents Its FBO Success Seminar: An MRI For Your FBO

NATF Announces Scholarship Recipient

NATA Selects New President

Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs

Regulatory Report

NATA Comments on Petition for Exemption from Federal Aviation Regulation Sections 61.3 and 61.23

Stakeholder Committee Recommends Collaborative Industry-Government Initiative to Facilitate Unleaded Avgas Transition

NATA and Conklin & de Decker to Hold Popular Tax Seminar

Letter to Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam in Opposition of Government Competition with Private Business

2012 Air Charter Summit Reaches New Heights

NATA Air Charter Summit Starts Today

FAA Proposes Changes to Repair Station Rules

NATA Summit to Raise Funds for Combat Wounded

NATA Releases 2012 Compensation Report

EPA Issues Final Rules on Deicing

Coyne Addresses Metropolitan Airport Commission

NATF Announces New Scholarship

NATA comments on FAA proposed 1500 Hour pilot training rule

Ask House And Senate Highway Bill Conference To Repeal Fuel Fraud Tax Today!

House Lawmakers Request Fuel Fraud Repeal

NATA Comments on EPA Underground Tank Rule

Request Your Member of Congress Sign a Support Letter to Repeal Fuel Fraud Provision in the Highway Bill

NATA Names Greenberg Business Management Committee Chair

Action Call
Sequestration and the Contract Tower Program